Profile avatar
grahamyapp.bsky.social
Failed-to-retire headteacher, now teaching GCSE & A level physics & chemistry in Hertfordshire and lurking here. Groundhopper, Modus Hopper Random blog with #keepertopcolourstats. Born West Brom. Duolingoer.
64 posts 135 followers 183 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
I get that. I find myself in content races and exam technique coaching so much of the time these days. But like you not a fan of one-size-fits-all structures and strictures.
comment in response to post
Last time I had a KS3 class of my own was (I think) 1993-4 !! Just the odd bit of cover since then. I've lived exclusively in 14-18 niche since coming back in 2013. Pros and cons.
comment in response to post
Now I have THAT tune on replay in my head ...
comment in response to post
This backstory is all new to me. I did see something war-related in one of Richard Brock's IoP Stories pamphlets about Geiger and Marsden being on opposite sides in the 14-18 war. I wonder whether some of the interesting historical stuff will survive the next review of the specifications.
comment in response to post
I didn't know the war backstory till very recently. Might add "get good science grades and maybe avoid conscription" to the Y11 options recruitment booklet ;)
comment in response to post
"This used to be on the specs but no longer is" has become a kind of post-16 catchphrase for me. I've always included him and his graph. Can provoke phys v chem banter about whether Z is merely nuclear charge in arbitrary units (and also whether charge should be treated as a discrete variable ...)
comment in response to post
I'm putting a price list up tomorrow ...
comment in response to post
Relentlessly promote science teaching as a worthy career with immense job satisfaction and no negatives whatsoever whilst keeping a straight face.
comment in response to post
During my second headship (a school in special measures, late noughties) we stopped having n-u-ds because attendance counter-productively went down, we assumed for the kind of reasons you are suggesting in your thread. Several charities were in the habit of asking for them at that time.
comment in response to post
Try zodiac sign just for the LOLs
comment in response to post
Thank you so much for this. It helps put my life into perspective. I wonder how many Handys and villas he has got through in the last 28 years!
comment in response to post
What was Lothar up to, please, on the day that I officially became a groundhopper? It was 5 October 1996 and I had no justifiable reason for being at Brentford 4 Rotherham Utd 2 at Griffin Park, other than I'd never been before.
comment in response to post
Into the dark #FridayFive 1. When Evening Falls (Spyro Gyra) 2. Night Time (Superorganism) 3. Another Night (Camel) 4. Midnight Black Earth (Bohren & Der Club of Gore) 5. Power in the Darkness (Tom Robinson Band)
comment in response to post
Oh no... that is a double whammy. I try to let the little dears mark their own hwk if that happens (fortunately only about once every two years these days). But how typically professionally dedicated of you to schedule most of your post-viral recovery time in the school holidays!
comment in response to post
Yes x100%. School open evenings (in general) and elephant's pointless toothpaste wind me up considerably.
comment in response to post
The demise of shiny chrome bumpers (my 1972 Morris Minor and 1976 VW Beetle) in favour of crushable plastic (every functional characterless family hatchback since then).
comment in response to post
I've just been marking the AQA 2024 GCSE Paper 1Hs as mocks for both phys and chem this week and there have been a couple of places on each mark scheme where better candidates have been disadvantaged because they see unintended things in the Q. My first experience with the 9-1 spec.
comment in response to post
I think Ford at Dagenham are/were the biggest transport designers in Ethics and look, someone had to do that and I just happened to be in the right place at the right time, that's all.
comment in response to post
Marking a set of mock GCSE physics papers! Back hopping in the spring, I hope.
comment in response to post
Yes!! That last slide is so important, agree completely. Also love the general concept and for my first one I feel strongly that Strong Opinions About Relatively Unimportant Things needs more capital letters for emphasis. Going to embrace SOARUTs from now on.
comment in response to post
Plug 3 of 2 etc etc. Come and work as a science tech for this lovely team (includes me, ahem) in a spacious prep room in which you could hypothetically swing a cat. www.teachinherts.com/find-a-job/v...
comment in response to post
Plug 2 of 2 : also great people, supportive team etc etc and you would definitely bump into me from time to time. www.teachinherts.com/find-a-job/v...
comment in response to post
Utterly depressing.
comment in response to post
(2/2) I'm OK with s&p model as being on balance better than the "types of E" that I grew up with, but it does seem to be floundering a bit. It leaves chemistry to explain (or hope pupils don't ask) why spontaneous endothemics happen.
comment in response to post
Well, that was very interesting, but the same time somewhat depressing that humankind is making things so difficult for itself for reasons of political or financial gain. (Context: space debris.) It's increasingly difficult to separate science from politics, I feel.