gurney1974.bsky.social
45 posts
26 followers
21 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Of course. You literally invented the word.
comment in response to
post
I cannot love this item much enough but isn't this something the Canadian government should have done the instant Musk participated in the tariffs business against Canada?
comment in response to
post
Banana... err... Orange Republic, you mean...
comment in response to
post
I have to throw up at this...
comment in response to
post
One of Hitler's crucial mistakes was the racial theory, which he aimed to put into practice by any means, making Germans the hated invading enemy in parts of the conquered territories, such as Ukraine, where the Wermacht soldiers were hailed as liberators when they first entered the country...
comment in response to
post
Whoever wrote that piece did Trump a favour. A decent job.
comment in response to
post
Why I do not wonder... Let's just say: to each his/her own.
comment in response to
post
I'd very much like to think that it had very much to do with dignity.
comment in response to
post
It's up to you. Please see to it.
comment in response to
post
I've been calling the Tesla Tzar First LadyBoy...
comment in response to
post
It is they who should be impeached for their cowardice, for not telling First Ladyboy to deal with the task he was set to and leave federal budget to financial experts and lawmakers. As he is none of them, he should leave it alone, especially when he wouldn't consider more than 400 million citizens!
comment in response to
post
No, Dear God: I think, moreover, I am dead positive that you are wrong here.
The First Ladyboy may bark up any tree he wants, but where are your lawmakers, Democrats and Republicans alike, shouting their throats dry, sending this bloated niemand back where he belongs?!
comment in response to
post
You.
comment in response to
post
Countless researches and articles were published about the shrinking possibilities of the lower middle-class and the ever widening wealth gap. While at the beginning of the 1980s a CEO's earnings were about maximum 7-10 times higher than the average staff, this ratio rose to 35 by the 2000s...
comment in response to
post
How many signs do the progressives have to send to the present leadership? Bernie Sanders was swept aside twice if memory serves. Now, the younger generation would like to shape US politics and raise barriers to the dangerous MAGA cult. They may provide solution: Pelosi & Co. clearly couldn't.
comment in response to
post
They don't have to be women: strong characters rarely tolerate people of likewise quality in their midst.
comment in response to
post
Dear God: see to it! Please do!
comment in response to
post
True enough but he was instrumental in GOP victory even back in 2016 since he delivered and performed the campaign and rally format to which the average working Joe and Jane responded positively, that is, the reality show.
comment in response to
post
No one in their right mind would just simply give up the fight and step aside - very few examples prove the opposite though I wish it would be otherwise. Look at Netanyahu and you'll see some of the relevant points...
comment in response to
post
Trump as far as I am concerned has never been a Democrat. He was courting them in the '90s, trying to play the same game he managed with the GOP. The Dems then did not need him at the time, they were too strong themselves and did not need an already shady character even at that time.
comment in response to
post
Says the politician who has been complicit - albeit all her merits - in driving the Democratic Party to losing the White House, the Senate and the House. It's high time that such a candidate would run for leadership who cared to go out in her constituency to discover the failure of the election.
comment in response to
post
In Moscow. Let's hope he stays there.
comment in response to
post
We're all God's children - even if we do not take him granted and are sceptical about his existence.
comment in response to
post
She's not useful. She's dangerous.
comment in response to
post
Dear God: for your and everyone else's attention: healthcare is nowhere free in the world. The difference is that for example in Europe, the whole of the society pays for it in form of taxation and the state provides most of the medical services.
comment in response to
post
The U.S. doesn't necessarily want to engage into hostile economic rivalry or actual military conflict with the leading states of the BRICS but aims to secure her economic-political influence in Latin -, and South America.
comment in response to
post
The American process has taken a start under Obama: the establishment tried to normalise its relationship with Russia and China - meaning, gaining time. The Republicans' response was a so-called return to the old Monroe doctrine, choosing to rival with China and Russia if they have to.
comment in response to
post
Russia was expanding her fossils energy driven business into an empire, having been tried to subjugate the EU, China has been seeking to broaden her influence in the Far-East and Africa, the countries of South America also try to break away from US influence.
comment in response to
post
Please try to see that Trump is just the face of the reactionary movement within the GOP. As always throughout history, leading states or blocks have always given a certain response to the challenge(s) raised by their rivals. This is the growing nationalism and economic liberalism of the BRICS.
comment in response to
post
What do you expect from a pathological liar?...
comment in response to
post
Another shining page in the long, great work of Creation. Awesome, God! 😁
comment in response to
post
I am thankful that You created Bluesky upon your likeness. Please don't break character. :-D
comment in response to
post
Have been doing it. For ages.
comment in response to
post
And the GOP.
comment in response to
post
It's not "Trump" himself but the business interests financing the GOP. Could you please be precise and do not make things unnecessarily foggy.
comment in response to
post
Dear God, do not overexaggerate. You're immortal. 😁
comment in response to
post
Who ever said that I want her to be president? Read and comprehend if you please!
comment in response to
post
But Trump and his loyalists (Steve Bannon for example) could hollow the Constitution or transform the President's office so that such an oath would signify an overall support for the President's Office. Frogs are being cooked slowly in the pot - they hardly notice that they are doomed.
comment in response to
post
Not exactly change the text of the military oath: this radical zed GOP still has not got to that point just yet: this would be a tremendous alteration with dire consequences. High ranking officers would oppose this in the first place and the entire Democratic Party with all their supporters.
comment in response to
post
No: until Hitler took over, German officers swore their oath to the Weimar Republic's Constitution. It was only after 1933 that they were obliged to profess their allegiance to the Furher. That was what I meant.
comment in response to
post
It depends how long Trump manages to hold out. But I think he's desperate to find a successor in his own family. He's tried to lure hus sons to no avail so far, Ivanka is thoroughly not interested - Lara Trump might be his stellar hope, but they have to build up her image.
comment in response to
post
For now... Wermacht officers also did.
comment in response to
post
Sorry to disappoint you but you're just at the very beginning of the long, dishonorable road.
comment in response to
post
Then why do you tolerate it to happen in the first place?... 🫤
comment in response to
post
Speakin' right from the Kremlin Wall... But You, Almighty, should know the best that banning billionaires just makes their status more desirable...