gvenables.bsky.social
Retired on Wadandi Noongar country. Formerly a lawyer, teacher (Law at University), and soldier. Now a writer. Foodie. Like a drop of red. Politically progressive. Don’t like misogynists, racists, hypocrites. Love Aussie Rules football.
193 posts
675 followers
701 following
Prolific Poster
Conversation Starter
comment in response to
post
Unbelievable!! Freedom of speech, freedom of the press?!? Is this footage from a dictatorship in Africa?
comment in response to
post
Freedom of speech? Fifth
comment in response to
post
Insane oxygen thief
comment in response to
post
I’m not sure the Government of the day actually has a say in who gets the gong. Anyone or any organisation can nominate a person and then I believe an independent body makes a recommendation to the Governor General. Correct me if I’m wrong
comment in response to
post
Devaluing the award is a good idea
comment in response to
post
Good. Devalue the award. It’s not an award for volunteering. People are given the award for doing a job they were paid to do
comment in response to
post
You’ve put me right off nachos!
comment in response to
post
Nah!
comment in response to
post
Who is to know if they are police officers? They do indeed look like highwaymen. Hoodlums actually. I’m free to say that because I live in Australia!
comment in response to
post
He’s a lowlife!
comment in response to
post
It was simply a political payoff
comment in response to
post
It’s not unreasonable to run from masked men
comment in response to
post
Lots
comment in response to
post
The truth is, nobody is safe in the USA. Just ask the survivors of gun massacres
comment in response to
post
and Peter Dutton
comment in response to
post
Whilst it was excellent investigative journalism that revealed the failure of Dutton to disclose his property and business interests, it was more significant that he refused to be interviewed by you, Louise, at any time during the election campaign. Transparency? Accountability?
comment in response to
post
Serious observation. Surely it would only be invalid if you could be identified as the voter?