gwenforr.bsky.social
Artist, guitar builder, stargazer, housewife. genderless witch in a trans woman’s body.
639 posts
196 followers
79 following
Getting Started
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Women can also be Kristi Noem
comment in response to
post
Too bad you didn’t have this one..
comment in response to
post
Oh ok yeah, I thought we were talking about the op image
comment in response to
post
Definitely not a Hasselblad. Those were film cameras back then, and Galileo was an uncrewed mission bound for Jupiter. It actually wouldn’t take much to get a photo like this in terms of the optical system itself, but the electronic imaging was pretty advanced:
nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/nmc/experime...
comment in response to
post
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mare_Or...
comment in response to
post
Ossae
comment in response to
post
*angry goose meme*
“And what happened to Doctor King and the other non-violent protesters, Derek?”
“What fucking happened to them?!!”
comment in response to
post
Call that a Strawbazzle
comment in response to
post
Lol, wait til they find out who is really blocking the release of those files
comment in response to
post
The alt text says this is from one of Jupiter’s moons.
It is not.
That is our moon, and the photo was taken from earth.
comment in response to
post
Yes, the original is real and I have seen it before as well.
The image that was posted came from one of the many bot-run pages with “jwst” in their name, which post mostly ai crap. It had an extra planet, no stars, and was “cleaned up” in other noticeable ways.
comment in response to
post
It was actually your question that made me realize something was wrong. It’s been a while since I’ve seen the original, but it used to get shared around quite a bit
comment in response to
post
No, it is an ai rendition of the photo you are referring to.
This is the original
comment in response to
post
Neither, it is an ai rendition of the original photo. This is the real deal here
comment in response to
post
Unfortunately it is an ai rendition of his photo.
This is the original
comment in response to
post
I’ve never had gps
I use my iPad these days, but it’s WiFi only, and I just look at google maps beforehand and write down notes on an index card.
comment in response to
post
Marsrise (sorry Paul)
Taken by me, January 14, 2025
comment in response to
post
Spork
comment in response to
post
That’s because it gets more lucrative the more you dilute it
comment in response to
post
Wait, what?
comment in response to
post
Galaxies aren’t tilted any particular way. You can see Andromeda tilted either way, or even horizontal or vertical, depending on where it is in the sky as the earth rotates.
comment in response to
post
Well only because we know it actually exists. Other than that, the image is completely hypothetical. Hubble isn’t capable of resolving it at anywhere near this scale. It’s just a tiny blob in the actual image. Like maybe twenty pixels or so.
comment in response to
post
The irony being that most of those same people will use diabetes risk to justify their fatphobia
comment in response to
post
She didn’t say morality.
She said religion.
They are not the same thing.
At all.
comment in response to
post
Seepy
comment in response to
post
I thought that was Caligula
comment in response to
post
I wonder how many astronomers got conked on the noggin by the end of that counterweight shaft before they put the boxing glove on it. Certainly not the way they had intended to see stars ✨😵💫😹
comment in response to
post
I love that you posted this during new moon, as if to test our faith 🌙
comment in response to
post
No, It is at an average of 58 million kilometers from the sun in its orbit, so it is quite often off to the side a bit from our perspective.
comment in response to
post
They make my iPad crash.
comment in response to
post
Yes, Mars was magnitude -1.4 when I took this. That’s 3.6 times as bright as Saturn was in the posted image (mag. 0)
comment in response to
post
Also consider how small the moon appears in the sky. It may give the impression of looking big, because we know that it is huge, but it can be completely obscured by the tip of your little finger held at arm’s length. Now consider what a fraction of that looks like.
comment in response to
post
The bright crater just to the right of Mare Crisium in the image is Proclus, with a diameter of 28 kilometers, which translates to an angular width of 14.4 arc seconds as seen from earth. Saturn’s angular size (not counting rings) at the time was 18 arc seconds.
comment in response to
post
I do, and all my space pics have it
comment in response to
post
And with a brighter planet you don’t have to do a composite.
comment in response to
post
This is is a very small portion of the moon that we are seeing here.
comment in response to
post
It is a composite of 3 images to deal with the differences in brightness, but the position and size are correct. It is just a very small portion of the moon that is seen in the frame.
petapixel.com/2020/08/03/h...
comment in response to
post
For me it’s the ones where you have to save the king from some ridiculous death, like bro you have no idea how much I despise royalty. The only reason I am still watching this dumb ad is the hope I will see him deep fried in lava.
comment in response to
post
“Oh, think of my career, my sweetheart dear, and my poor old invalid aunt,
Besides, I ain't no fool, I'm a goin' to school, and I'm working in a defense plant”
comment in response to
post
Well, technically none of these are “true” bugs (Hemiptera)
comment in response to
post
Hi can you give me one that I can find and photograph this time of year in the northern hemisphere?
comment in response to
post
How many animals have choked on this assholes balloons?
comment in response to
post
They say BlueSky doesn’t have an algorithm but this was the next post in my feed…
comment in response to
post
I hope they both lose
comment in response to
post
Yes, or like in Lothlorien maybe.
We have some up the creek behind our house and I always go look for them