hamptonmakes.com
That computer nerd gay who invented some shit and drank some cocktails.
🏠New York 🏠New Orleans
181 posts
97 followers
119 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Oh man, so good! Is Michael R Jackson doing it?!?
comment in response to
post
“They were given authority to kill one-quarter of the world by war, by famine, by plagues and with the wild animals of the earth.”
comment in response to
post
Instantly transported!
comment in response to
post
Also, sometimes you DO need JavaScript, and frameworks like Stimulus make it easy to layer in more interactivity
comment in response to
post
Sorry for the slow response here-
You render HTML on the server. And most “event listeners” are sort of built into thinks like <a> and <form>
And some prefetching/rendering stuff goes a longgg ways.
It ends up so simple that it is shocking!
comment in response to
post
I was ready to die of jealousy
comment in response to
post
To me 2025 is not using react at all for anything. #webstandards
comment in response to
post
Is that yours?!
comment in response to
post
Very cool!
--- the thing I'm struggling with is that I want to see the font with my own text without having to install for a trial. Especially because I want to replace my website's "Hampton Lintorn-Catlin" and I need to make sure that looks cool.
Ya know? Like on DaFont?
comment in response to
post
It would be nice if liberals could point out that the trans ban violates the actual Second Amendment. The Supreme Court won't actually care, but the truth matters. The truth is this ban is blatantly unconstitutional.
comment in response to
post
If you wanna rant- I’m here!
comment in response to
post
YES!
comment in response to
post
Amy- thank you for sharing this.
It’s so helpful to others who might be suffering and not sure why they are going through something similar.
I’m so happy to hear that you are reacting well to this new approach and feeling better. ❤️
comment in response to
post
Hugs.
comment in response to
post
I don't need to agree with every SCOTUS decision to respect them– I'll happily listen to a well-reasoned opinion I disagree with.
But at least have some intellectual integrity!
comment in response to
post
Just wait for the next term though, when I bet all-of-the-sudden with Trump in office, they are gonna say "Oh yeah, agencies can do whatever the fuck they want" and reverse their reversal in deference.
SCOTUS no longer has my respect with these clown decisions.
comment in response to
post
Obviously, last term we had the bonkers Dobbs decision totally reversing the law of the land for the last 40+ years.
And one that was even more wild was throwing out Chevron, that gave presumptive wiggle room to agencies to interpret the law– limiting the ability of agencies to act without congress
comment in response to
post
There is a term in law called "stare decisis" which means basically, keep things as stable as possible from your decisions. And this court has little interest in that- they are ready and willing to just throw out precedent entirely.
comment in response to
post
If someone comes in with a case, they are supposed to sort of make as little fuss from a decision as possible. Just decide exactly what's needed to solve the issue, then go on your way.
This court does seem to really WANT to have an active decision making role in how the government works.
comment in response to
post
Like, the vibe is that they are sort of spitballing ideas or decisions they could pronounce during the arguments. A brainstorming session of what they could come up with maybe.
This is the opposite of the idea of the court which traditionally tries to make the smallest ruling possible.
comment in response to
post
Something that's been happening that is entirely new is that SCOTUS has agreed to hear several cases this term, where in arguments, the Justices clearly realize that the case doesn't actually present them with an opportunity to make a ruling they are hoping to make.
comment in response to
post
Definitely agree with the impeachment angle. That's not gonna happen, no matter how much Congress' powers are trampled by the executive.