hatpromise.bsky.social
99 posts
46 followers
33 following
Getting Started
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Why is she citing a rule about audits but asking him about revoking non-profit status? Can non-profit status can only be revoked as a result of an audit?
(I'm not saying that's why *he* won't answer the question. If that were the case he should have said so. I'm asking for myself.)
comment in response to
post
What else is off-limits? Does he bathe? Does he eat food? Walk on two feet?
comment in response to
post
(Not that she's right about what suspending it is, either.)
comment in response to
post
She had never heard of it before this particular issue, so she thinks habeas corpus is the same thing as *suspending* habeas corpus.
comment in response to
post
For a second I thought I needed to turn on ad blocking on this photo.
comment in response to
post
If he thinks "illegal aliens" are space aliens (like asylum seekers being escapees from insane asylums) that would explain the "space-based" approach.
comment in response to
post
You're just kidding, right?
comment in response to
post
So many new terms just waiting for him to come up with.
comment in response to
post
Aide: No, that's just what they're called. ... Uh... 'cause that's what they are.
Trump: Old-fashioned but accurate, got it.
comment in response to
post
Trump: Groceries? What's that?
Aide, confused: Uh... What are groceries? It's like, food and stuff you buy at the store.
Trump: Oh, is that what they're calling that now?
Aide: Well, no, that term has been around for a long time.
Trump: Ah, so it's an old-fashioned word.
comment in response to
post
Hypothesis: Watching TV is how he learns everything he thinks he knows about ordinary people. He probably knows that people go walk around in a big store and buy food, but hadn't until recently seen anybody on TV refer to what they buy as groceries.
comment in response to
post
We'll have to wait for him to come up with a new word I guess.
comment in response to
post
"I don't want to seem like I'm being evasive, but pardon me while I evade."
comment in response to
post
"I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody, because it would be a very public and transparent act, OK?"
comment in response to
post
Another update:
Shortly after the "don't show it to anybody" request, AI Overview was back, and I couldn't get it to disable itself again by telling it now to. I flew too close to the sun, I guess.
So I asked it to wait until the year 2095 before showing it to me again. That seems to have worked.
comment in response to
post
UPDATE: Just for good measure, I just did the following search: "NEVER SHOW THE AI OVERVIEW TO ANYBODY, EVER, FOR ANY SEARCH, GOOGLE."
You're welcome in advance if I just saved the world from AI.
comment in response to
post
...eventually it gave me something like "AI Overview not available for this search."
Then I searched for "NEVER SHOW ME THE AI OVERVIEW AGAIN, GOOGLE."
Poof! Gone. I've done a few more searches and it's still not there. Worth a try!
2/2
comment in response to
post
Sorry, I meant a MAGA Schism with its own Pope, not a MAGA Pope in the Vatican
comment in response to
post
If what I've read so far is any indication, there might be a MAGA pope soon. I haven't been Catholic for a long time, so I don't really care, but please, no MAGA style guide!
comment in response to
post
Well, they get off on it, for one thing. Maybe even the main thing.
comment in response to
post
More with the dolls and pencils. They intentionally picked a couple of products that literally nobody is worried about the price of.
comment in response to
post
"I just think they're neat!"
comment in response to
post
I think the mistake reporters like this make is that they assume that his absurd level of ignorance speaks for itself. Instead, the president says "I don't know," and lots of people think that means it's not as straightforward a violation of the Constitution as it is.
comment in response to
post
It's a real post, and it's his real account.
x.com/LindseyGraha...
comment in response to
post
Also, I don't remember him having a problem with Kristi Noem playing footsie with the prison itself.
comment in response to
post
Whoa whoa whoa, hold on there, that dirt is for the farmers who can't afford fertilizer anymore with the tariffs.
comment in response to
post
No worries! Sometimes when I make a joke I forget that not everybody consumes as much NYT Pitchbot and Praximus Prime!
comment in response to
post
I didn't think it needed a /s, but okay... /s.
comment in response to
post
As a vegan I can't vote for ovicide.
comment in response to
post
Hang in there, Daniel, 48, New York, white, events manager. You just have to vote for him again in '28. By then he'll have had more time to reflect.
comment in response to
post
What if it's just an exercise, and not actual team building. A "team building exercise" if you will.
comment in response to
post
It's like these people have never heard of a rough draft.
comment in response to
post
"If they want peace they shouldn't be fighting against Russia's invasion. Also if they wanted to keep Crimea why didn't they fight against Russia's invasion?"
comment in response to
post
...but in this Ohio diner...
comment in response to
post
I wish they'd use the words "personal" and "unsecured" rather than "private." To a casual reader, the latter sounds like no harm could have be done, 'cause if it was private, what's the problem.
comment in response to
post
"Only the richest, most elite, most city-folk candidate has a chance of saving us from the rich, elite, city folk. It's just a coincidence that he's also to most racist and we happen to be racist too."
comment in response to
post
Gotta start somewhere, and asking them to give evidence of their claims is as good a place as any. A good *next* question, if they were to provide evidence, would be, okay, why hasn't he been charged with a crime and given a court date?
comment in response to
post
I'm sure the senator agrees that none of them should be treated like this at all. I don't feel like I have the right to complain that the senator, who is resisting in a way that puts himself in actual physical danger, isn't resisting comprehensively enough.
comment in response to
post
Normally I'm on board with demanding more from our elected officials, but IMO right now is not the time to be asking more of this particular senator. What he's doing is incredibly courageous, dangerous, and meaningful. His checking on Garcia paves the way for bringing all the innocent people home.
comment in response to
post
I wish they hadn't resorted to body shaming. There are plenty of insults available that could accurately depict her character and actions without reference to her physical form.
comment in response to
post
If you've managed to capture the attention of someone who's been ignoring this whole thing, you're gonna lose them immediately if you start with "the only actual proof," because it implies that there IS actual proof.
comment in response to
post
That is, I think it's less "people should work there but not me," and more "it would be good to have more American manufacturing, but currently it sucks to be an American worker."