hre.bsky.social
40 posts
6 followers
40 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Elon Musk’s turned into the global ‘Ketamine Karen’—flinging insults and abusing power while his rep crashes like a meteor. Who knew rockets could burn so fast?
comment in response to
post
A climate of fear-driven self-censorship, where political figures risk backlash from powerful voices for challenging ‘revisionist’ narratives. As beeing noted, this ‘disordered discourse’ is a strategic weapon: it undermines truth, punishes dissent, and ultimately erodes democratic foundations
comment in response to
post
Looking forward to listen the recording ✌️
comment in response to
post
Europe cannot rely on U.S. support, especially under Trump. Dependence breeds vulnerability. Instead of seeking risky compromises, Europe must strengthen its defense, expand alliances, and prepare to stand alone if needed. Realism demands action, not hope
comment in response to
post
This move aligns with the authoritarian mindset Trump admires—dismissing civilian casualties as collateral damage, just like Putin. Eliminating oversight on civilian harm paves the way for unchecked military force, a hallmark of dictatorial regimes. This isn’t strength; it’s a step toward impunity😶🌫️
comment in response to
post
Tyrants often rise by undermining institutions, but history shows their rule is fragile. Authoritarian regimes typically fall due to internal fractures or external pressures when the structures they rely on crumble. Despite temporary power, unchecked authority rarely lasts long
comment in response to
post
Defenseless under the night, yet ironic points of light still flicker—Trump’s trials, Elon’s chaos, Putin’s maneuvers. The world spirals, but defiance remains. As power bends truth, voices rise. In a month of shadows, will we, like Auden’s Just, exchange messages of light or be swallowed by despair?
comment in response to
post
They are in the upside-down
comment in response to
post
George Washington is dead.
Abe Lincoln is dead.
John F. Kennedy is dead.
Martin Luther King is dead.
But Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid live—
they shoot from the hip
in the middle of the White House....
comment in response to
post
You have killed your future, America.
All you have left
is a flock of mangy hawks
and a weather vane
comment in response to
post
George Washington is dead.
Abe Lincoln is dead.
John F. Kennedy is dead.
Martin Luther King is dead.
But Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid live—
they shoot from the hip
in the middle of the White House
comment in response to
post
Zelenskyy’s visit exposes how disordered discourse has captured U.S. politics. The GOP abandoned truth for conspiracy and grievance, and now performative outrage dictates foreign policy. A dangerous moment for America and its allies…it was sad to watch this evening
comment in response to
post
Lisa Franchetti is the real deal—solid through and through, the kind of leader who earns respect the hard way. Unlike the insecure TV clown who fired her, she’s not playing dress-up as a commander. The fact that millions thought it was a good idea to put that fraud in charge…no words needed
comment in response to
post
Just pray they all have courage to ignore, that would be interesting 🫣
comment in response to
post
The question now is whether the U.S. political system has the resilience to withstand this test or if it will follow the path of past republics that have succumbed to demagogues. The stakes could not be higher…
comment in response to
post
Big Tech is replacing governments in influence, shaping elections, speech, and even wars. Cambridge A showed how data manipulates voters, while Musk’s control of X and Starlink raises sovereignty concerns. As AI and automation grow, democracies risk becoming dependent on unelected tech oligarchs
comment in response to
post
When you cut oversight, you invite chaos. Infrastructure attacks aren’t ‘if’ but ‘when.’ Those who know where to look already see the cracks forming. Hope people are ready to go off-grid when it hits
comment in response to
post
Adorno’s warnings on fascist rhetoric ring true when we see President Trump’s open disdain for critics and democratic norms. Dismissing such language as mere show can lead to normalization, enabling authoritarian impulses to flourish, just as Adorno cautioned
comment in response to
post
Negotiating from a position of weakness won’t bring peace, only surrender #whatawonderfullworld
comment in response to
post
2. No evidence of “$175B missing.” U.S. aid is tracked, and audits disprove large-scale misuse.
3. “War never had to start” ignores Russia’s full-scale invasion. Appeasement doesn’t end wars—it enables aggressors.
comment in response to
post
Diplomatic history also shows that appeasement rarely ends wars favorably. Negotiating from weakness against Putin risks rewarding aggression, not ending conflict
comment in response to
post
Trump’s characterization of Zelensky as a “dictator” ignores key facts. Ukraine, despite wartime constraints, remains a democracy fighting an existential war. Delayed elections are not unusual in such circumstances—Lincoln did the same in 1864
comment in response to
post
it’s often about perceived geopolitical or economic advantage. The key is strengthening institutional resilience, not just diagnosing decay ;/
comment in response to
post
While corruption and self-interest play a role, the broader trend reflects historical patterns of power consolidation. Democracies weaken when institutions erode, media is manipulated, and state mechanisms serve personal or ideological aims. Aligning with autocracies isn’t always just greed…
comment in response to
post
Internationally, reassure allies of U.S. stability while preparing for potential realignment. Time is short—passivity is not an option.
comment in response to
post
Democrats must act decisively to counter institutional erosion. Priorities: mobilize state governments as bulwarks, strengthen independent judiciary and media, and forge coalitions with business and military leaders who reject authoritarian drift
comment in response to
post
The question is whether Europe can respond with strategic cohesion before the window to act closes. The alternative is drift and paralysis in the face of a crisis that may define the next era of global power
comment in response to
post
The U.S. isn’t increasing its power; it’s accelerating fragmentation. What was once unthinkable—Washington destabilizing the West—now unfolds in real time. Allies must recognize this shift, or risk being caught unprepared
comment in response to
post
This is not just political turbulence—it’s a fundamental stress test for the global order. The historical parallels to 1938 or 1962 reflect the stakes: a superpower led by ideologues dismantling its own institutions while undermining allies..
comment in response to
post
History shows that crises breed reactionary forces, but also resistance. Democracy survives when people refuse to surrender to fear and division. The challenge isn’t just stopping authoritarian drift—it’s building a future that serves the many, not the few.
comment in response to
post
History warns us: when leaders claim they can break laws to “save” a nation, democracy is at risk. From Rome to modern times, unchecked power erodes republics. In a democracy, no one—not even a leader—stands above the law. #RuleOfLaw #HistoryMatters
comment in response to
post
Solid advice! Nothing says ‘team player’ like sharing mystery malware with the office. Bonus points if you label it ‘CEO’s Secrets’ before plugging it in—really adds to the excitement!
comment in response to
post
While there are certainly cases where policies might appear exploitative or overly paternalistic, understanding the intent and context behind different approaches is crucial to fostering meaningful dialogue. Do you think there’s room for common ground in addressing vulnerabilities?
comment in response to
post
The deep pockets grow only deeper. The motivation for such inventions is not in the benefit for the consumers but for those owning the shares
comment in response to
post
However, such preemptive action might also reflect a calculated response to campaign rhetoric or anticipated policy shifts. It would represent a deviation from conventional diplomacy, highlighting the increasing integration of economic and political strategies on the global stage.
comment in response to
post
The idea of countries preemptively implementing tariffs before a U.S. administration takes office would indeed be an unprecedented move. It would raise significant questions about international norms and the long-standing practice of waiting to see the policies of a new administration