jack-a-dandy.bsky.social
Maidenless, seething. I only comment in messages for the most part. If I flamed you.
1: Sorry
2: We both should be doing better things.
2,642 posts
121 followers
82 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
Ooh, found a nesting doll. Y'all are getting slower.
comment in response to
post
The *hope* is that that stupid fucking podcast and what the NYT and WaPo and everything were doing was trying to build brownie points.
"The fuck do you mean he's a radical? He HAD BANNON ON A PODCAST AND DIDN'T PUSH BACK!"
I don't agree with the strategy. But I hope it's strategy.
comment in response to
post
Make Bill Kristol listen to Kill James Bond and Well, There's Your Problem.
comment in response to
post
Tell him if he does it Lucas will make a movie of his life.
comment in response to
post
Well, the alternative to rehabilitation and being able to snap people out of it is...
Something that instantly gets you banned or deleted. Or something people are afraid to say. So it's survivorship bias influencing opinion.
zombie rules. If you believe they're brain rotted beyond saving...
comment in response to
post
You got it on tape?
comment in response to
post
Good, now get the WaPo folks to quit watering down and both sidesing shit and we can stop making things worse.
comment in response to
post
If you watch the footage you can see the strike and wobble.
comment in response to
post
The teleprompter was struck.
comment in response to
post
No need to go that far. Shard of glass from the hit teleprompter. He used it to worsen the wound, then rubbed his bloodied hand on his face.
WWE stagecraft 101.
comment in response to
post
This doesn't sort out bots, right?
Like organic vs inorganic users? I've been noticing certain patterns of bot accounts where they like...go without posting for like 2 week intervals.
Like...these numbers are super fucking easy to inflate?
So...the drop off when usual astroturf fails is a +.
comment in response to
post
Understood, sorry to pester.
comment in response to
post
It would be okay, may I write it out @ you and if it is actually potentially useful, would you repost/share it?
If you don't wanna hear it I won't. If it isn't useful I will delete it.
But I think there's actually something that could be done here memetically of value.
comment in response to
post
So...there's a thing with the origin of the F word as a gay slur.
I am saying this as a pan/poly man with a background in linguistics. I've actually had a sort of explainer for how the term has been used incorrectly, and how it is part and parcel to the "sin of sodomy" rewrite. If 1/2
comment in response to
post
Grandpa doesn't know how to get his feeds working and would rather cry about it.
comment in response to
post
Cocksucker, LA has the national guard in it. We're kinda busy with important shit. Stop trying to bring shit takes in for the sake of pointless centrism, take your money and make Atlantic and WP and NYT piss off, and then we'll have more fun stuff. Or fix your feeds.
comment in response to
post
Maybe you can understand that the way to do that isn't through Bluesky, but by actually hitting the larger media outlets to better change normie opinions.
We haven't been fucking wrong.
And you already have ins that we don't.
comment in response to
post
If you say that name tag fast it sounds like dick him.
comment in response to
post
The Rhodesian Bareback knows exactly what he's quoting.
comment in response to
post
Chain and padlock what?
comment in response to
post
I remember KJB has a good bit about that with the film The Card Counter.
comment in response to
post
Nichols never learns. He still thinks Republicans used to be principled and he kept posting after that first and undying ratio.
He will never fucking learn. He is physically incapable of it.
Good RU POV and historical knowledge though.
comment in response to
post
Just be a little more careful with your words in the future, yeah? It's annoying but little things like that are how they normalize it.
comment in response to
post
Says the Russian.
comment in response to
post
Record every instance of property damage done by ICE.
comment in response to
post
Nah, you're a solo guy. Nesting dolls can at least get the occasional like and don't have nearly as many dead posts.
You're imitating the posting style of a bot though. And not even well.
Maybe this is why you can't make it as a writer.
comment in response to
post
Fash apologists fucking drench their panties over that kinda stuff. "Oh, if only the generals weren't constrained by Hitler they could have won".
They wanna be 40k freaks and armchair generals? Make them defend the tactical choices of how you kit up 30 dudes like that and get run off with sticks.
comment in response to
post
So, 35% may be solid support. But it may still flake. Further, it must be seen that that support is both a sin and also just logically/tactically unsound.
IE:NYT could switch to saying that ICE tactics are strategically bad and wasteful and letting yourself get surrounded is poor playcalling
comment in response to
post
Fuckup, every tactical failure, every botch job, what if on X...they're being told it's a purposeful fuckup from inside? "I mean, we have all three branches. Why the fuck aren't we winning? Obviously these have been traitors the whole time."