jackchancer.bsky.social
2,062 posts
586 followers
34 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Courts can't stop someone "before they start". That's not
how a court works - they always function after the fact.
comment in response to
post
Which means if he DOES follow through the disaster will be unmitigated.
comment in response to
post
Most of them are poor people. They're scared and want daddy to tell them what to do, to make the world simple and safe. They're emotionally stunted into a permanent child state.
comment in response to
post
Hemogloblin is only present in people who have been attacked by globlin-goblins. Technically they're no longer human at that point - real humans have clear blood, free of hemogloblin.
Embrace the low quality facts.
comment in response to
post
I wasn't sure 3 years ago. Now I'm pretty sure they don't work.
And would they really use nukes just to protect, say, Yakutsk? The entire territory is barely 1 million people. It's population density is less than a person per square mile. Surely Putin wouldn't risk the end of the world, right?
comment in response to
post
Exactly where my head went. If they don't even look like cops and certainly don't act in a lawful manner then I can't blame a soul for defending themselves or others.
comment in response to
post
That's a long list.
comment in response to
post
He scares cowards. Hence why he has a strangle hold on conservatives.
comment in response to
post
And hitler...
Really, it's a fascist thing. Can't have the pawns forgetting who their enemies are, lest they see the strings attached to them.
comment in response to
post
...no shit? There's a reason those of us that cared about palestine begged people to vote against trump. It was obvious from the jump that he'd be fine with Gaza being reduced to a gravel pit.
comment in response to
post
Tons of natural resources, plenty of land, weak military, next door to Sarah Palin.. Honestly, if you're going to war monger then threatening to seize russian land isn't a bad way to go about it.
comment in response to
post
And in 3 weeks he'll be giving them -35% tariffs. That's right, he'll be subsidizing companies that import from russia with tax payer dollars.
Before jumping up to 800% tariffs the next day.
comment in response to
post
So trump is just openly admitting he's been providing cover for russia? Funny how cracks of truth are finally starting to spill through.
comment in response to
post
Remember, trump supporters also thought your grandma should die for the economy in 2020. I don't think this is going to shake the base at all.
comment in response to
post
Right, but how does that make "the right people" suffer? You can't ignore how important it is to the current regime that those without money be made to suffer as much as possible. I'm surprised they aren't livestreaming the food rotting and forcing starving people around the world to watch.
comment in response to
post
As a cis/het, gotta agree with you. My sexuality certainly wasn't a choice for me.
comment in response to
post
We used to do that. It was called "taxes" and is a much more efficient way to coordinate large scale operations than depending on the largess of individual contributors.
comment in response to
post
That'd be socialism. We can't even get school lunches to kids we force to attend schools everywhere here.
As always, the suffering is the point.
comment in response to
post
The best time to understand democracy was 2016. The second best time is right now.
comment in response to
post
Biden was smart enough to know that one person can't do literally everything, so he put trustworthy people in place and delegated appropriately. trump is stuck on the idea that no one but him can perform every single task, which is especially bad seeing as he spends most of his time ignoring work.
comment in response to
post
I think he's genuinely clueless on Putin. How? I have no clue. But unlike his lies, the shock and borderline admission of ignorance is very much off center from his usual reaction.
Considering literally everyone else the world over knows Putin is a genocidal megalomaniac with conquest aspirations..
comment in response to
post
Forgot the part where they were yelling at Zelenskyy for not saying "thank you" enough times..
What a fucking disgrace those two are.
comment in response to
post
What, didn't you see how he bravely tweeted "Putin stawwwwwhp" the other day? He's still super tough and has the world's respect...
comment in response to
post
Okay, but how many had been on TV? You really can't buy experience like that.
Seriously, sarcasm aside, I want off this slow motion plane wreck.
comment in response to
post
I literally don't care if he was senile. If he was then he surrounded himself with exellent regents before his faculties left. He could have been a drooling invalid and he'd still be doing better than the one man "best at everything" trump show.
comment in response to
post
Distinct from the similar "Archeologist funeral" where they must wait until burial before plundering.
comment in response to
post
...none of those things were in the tax bill they passed. They lied to you.
Democrats brought high tech jobs to American shores through the CHIPS act, and started renovating failing infrastructure through the Build Back Better bill. Democrats have actually delivered, despite repubs undermining.
comment in response to
post
This has always been the heart of conservatives. "I suffered and so too should our youth".
comment in response to
post
So the neo-confederates lost their holiday to the North, and now we're burning them on it? Fucking appropriate.
comment in response to
post
Hey, at least the nazi soldiers weren't Americans attacking America.
comment in response to
post
Paraphrasing the late, great lindsey graham - If you vote for him he will destroy you, and you will deserve it.
comment in response to
post
Being queer is something a person is born to. They don't have control over that. Being a cop is a decision with many steps between formation and conclusion. No one is born an asshole but decisions certainly can make someone that way.
comment in response to
post
Also.. all the ones they fired then immediately had to rehire because they were incredibly essential.
comment in response to
post
The sample size isn't nearly as big as it should be, but it's true in 100% of cases so far.
comment in response to
post
I have friends who are Satanists (TST, not LaVoy) and they're still more Christian than them.
comment in response to
post
@thedailyshow.com Wasn't Jon Stewart just talking about authenticity amongst Democrats? Maybe he should be doing an interview.
comment in response to
post
Eh.. more like if he was doing this in 1945.
comment in response to
post
No food in schools? You don't want food to be allowed in a place where minors are forced, by law, to attend ~7 hours a day? Tell me you've never set foot in a school before without telling me, amirite? Thankfully you're not in a position to make any rules.
comment in response to
post
Okay, so you're in favor of supporting people's bodily autonomy so they can have abortions if needed?
comment in response to
post
You don't even have to look so far from the church as our government. Just look within the church itself.
comment in response to
post
They just tried. We'll see if the Senate goes along with it, but the House has voted.
comment in response to
post
Damnedest thing, no one knows. It just shows up!
comment in response to
post
Hold up, we had a miscommunication. I misread your earlier comment to say that Israel ISN'T committing genocide.
But also, read your own links. You basically sent an explanation of mine while claiming it was some update which isn't true.
comment in response to
post
Even better, they link to the current definition in your link and guess what! It's literally what I posted earlier! Fuck off with your con game.
comment in response to
post
In fact, just did a search of your link to make sure I didn't miss anything. The phrase "deliberately kill" doesn't appear anywhere on there. Why? Because you made that shit up.
comment in response to
post
Did you even read your own link? Article II is literally word for word identical to mine. Also, your link isn't the "current definition", its an explanation of the current definition which.. is exactly what I posted.
Your "gotcha" amounts to you being unable to read.
comment in response to
post
www.un.org/en/genocidep...
You're literally lying buddy. Using half the definition leaves out a hell of a lot. If you have to lie to make your point then you're not making a point worth a damn.
comment in response to
post
I know it's a legal definition. I linked to it. Israel is running afoul of Article II section C for sure, and it can be easily argued that it's also violating parts A and B. There are complicating factors because of Hamas's violent actions towards civilians but Neta's words makes it clear.