jaegerx.bsky.social
97 posts
377 followers
204 following
Getting Started
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Kein Stess, es ist fertig ausgezählt und der Vorsprung ist deutlich.
comment in response to
post
Now look at BE:
There is close to NO buffer between nuclear and renewables.
So why should it be useful to bring them back? The can't really replace any FF, because the can't be run as flexible as gas. And shutting down wind/solar doesn't make sense at all.
energy-charts.info/charts/power...
2/2
comment in response to
post
And?
Nuclear is incompatible on a fundamental level with renewables.
For example, with every new KW of solar installed in FR the nuclear output gets lower. That will drive up the cost per kwh for nuclear. You can cleary see the dip in nuclear evey sunny day.
energy-charts.info/charts/power...
1/2
comment in response to
post
From predicted 2.5% to -0.3%....
www.philadelphiafed.org/surveys-and-...
comment in response to
post
Wie wirkt sich dass dann wohl im Sommer aus. Da ist die Stromnachfrage schon geringer als im Winter(-20GW in der Spitze) und durch PV müssen die AKWs dann noch mehr gedrosselt werden? Erkennt bei denen keiner das Problem mit den AKWs?
comment in response to
post
Das kann man schon planen, die Dunkelflauten sind ja Wetter abhängig und das kann man schon gut vorhersagen.
comment in response to
post
Bei Gas/H2 ist Standby extrem viel günstiger, da dann der teure Brennstoff gespaart wird. Standby bei einem AKW macht nicht viel Unterschied. AKWs sind wirtschaftlich gesehen einfach nicht kompatibel mit EE. Das sieht man an jedem stark sonnigen/windigen Tag.
2/2
comment in response to
post
Ein AKW ist aber noch extrem viel schlimmer als H2 für die Dunkelflauten. Lassen wir die Dunkelflauten mal 20%(eher weniger) der Zeit im Jahr sein. Dann reduziert sich schon die Laufzeit der AKWs auf 1/5 und erhäht somit den Preis um das 5fache.
1/2
comment in response to
post
They are between 37-42 years old. 40 years was the planned lifetime for most of the npp in the past. But the specific details obviously different between plants. The state and how much investment would be needed can only be known on plant to plant bases, and I don't think is public knowledge.
comment in response to
post
Only comparing the operational costs for a single plant over the years would give us the correct values. And that's my whole argument. As the npp gets older, the maintenance costs go up.
2/2
comment in response to
post
It doesn't make sense that the operational costs(excluding maintenance) would be dependend on the age of the reactor and going down with age. And I haven't seen anyone saying that. Comparing the old US fleet vs a newer one isn't productive in any way.
1/2
comment in response to
post
Thats missleading because they don't start with the same investment costs. It is well known that older npps need more maintenance and the maintenance gets more expensive. If you compare only the maintenance costs, newer plants are less expensive.
comment in response to
post
www.neimagazine.com/advanced-rea...
The availibility of replacement parts is only one problem.
comment in response to
post
Ofc there is a limit. The moment it is too expensiv too run it.
And it is normal that the amount of costs to keep the plants running will rise with age. 2/2
comment in response to
post
www.eia.gov/todayinenerg...
"U.S. utilities already make significant investments in maintaining and upgrading the current fleet of U.S. nuclear power plants to ensure safe, secure, and reliable operation throughout their 40- or 60-year lifetimes."
1/2
comment in response to
post
That's not how it works. NPPs are build to last a certain amount of time and need expensive work done to extend that. Most of them are not up to standard and have serious security issues.
Solar is already cheaper than LTO nuclear in some cases, especially in counties with a lot of sun.
comment in response to
post
That is saddly not an anwer to my question.
comment in response to
post
that's why we have batteries. They are already at 1,25c per kWh today in germany, with prices as low as 0,4c in the near future.
And seasonal storage is not needed. In spain much more wind energy gets produced in the winter months. Same as in germany.
comment in response to
post
I find this arument fascinating, becaus it is always comming without real hard numbers to back it up. How much is it for lto nuclear in spain, including storage?
comment in response to
post
reusing would mean more expensive. And solar could already be cheaper then lto nuclear, even without adding longterm storage costs.
comment in response to
post
And how many npp do we need for that? I'm sure not many...
comment in response to
post
But it is an econ question, not a physics question... just because it is possible doesn't mean it is economical.
comment in response to
post
I would encourage you to read this:
npolicy.org/wp-content/u...
comment in response to
post
www.belfercenter.org/publication/...
Done doesn't equal economical....
comment in response to
post
Spain has a huge amount of wind and solar potential. Why waste more money on nuclear?
comment in response to
post
why isn't it done by everyone? Maybe to expensive?
comment in response to
post
8kWp Süd und 10kWp Nord.
Zusammen mit Dämmung, Speicher, WP und Brauchwassernutzung wurden die jählichen Ausgaben für Strom, Wasser, Heizung von 5000€ auf 500€ gedrückt.
comment in response to
post
Except mining, recycling and storage.
It is clearly not clean energy.
comment in response to
post
Endlich ist der Durchbruch da. Jetzt wird es hoffentlich sehr schnell gehen, solange die Bürokratie da keine Probleme macht.
comment in response to
post
Du kannst auch nix anders als billigen Populismus betreiben?
comment in response to
post
Wenn man das so oberflächlich betrachtet wie du dann ja. Fakt ist, das China einfach alles baut weil der Bedarf stark steigt. Da aber der Anteil an EEs auch in China steigt und damit Kohle & Gas prozentual deutlich sinken, wird das Ergebniss das gleich werden wie bei uns, dass die Emissionen sinken.
comment in response to
post
Wir sollten eher danach geehen wie ökoöogisch Wertvoll der Wald ist. Selbst ein intakter Mischwald kann schlechter sein als diverse Alternativen.
comment in response to
post
And that is the standard building time for us or eu?
We need solutions now, not in 10 years or more.
comment in response to
post
Still only 3 years to build. Change the stupid regulatory roadblocks and it could be much faster:
youtu.be/hmeM0zxJqFI
Arguing with worst case szenarios isn't a good idea, especially if you like nuclear...
comment in response to
post
3 years is much shorter then 6-8 years for a npp...
comment in response to
post
Wenn du dich das fragst dann bist du wohl kaum mit dem gesamten Thema vertraut. Und ich warte immernoch auf eine Quelle für deine Behauptung.
comment in response to
post
Das ist genau 0 ein Beweis. Zeig mir klar, dass es am fehlenden Druck auf die Länder liegt. Es einfach abzuleiten und dabei diverse andere mögliche Faktoren zu ignorieren ist lächerlich.
comment in response to
post
Und das kannst du sicher belegen....
comment in response to
post
*Strohmann Argumente
comment in response to
post
Kriminelle Ausländer werden abgeschoben. Nur kann man keine Leute abschieben wenn die Länder die nicht zurücknehmen. Warum also solche trohmann Argumente?
comment in response to
post
The point is, you have a very large and messy book full of stories, rules and ideas, some of them even contradict each other.
Every christian chooses what they want to believe and what they don't, or what is literal and what is allegorical.
See how that does become a problem?
comment in response to
post
Do you wear mixed fabrics? I'm sure you do. Now you can argue "thats not the correct interpretation" and so on.
You yourself choose what you want to beleve, they do the same. Doesn't make it less valid because these are believes, not facts.
comment in response to
post
Da die CDU doch klar bis weit rechts geht ist das Problem nicht von der Hand zuweisen. Anbei eine Metaanalyse die das deutlich belegt:
journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1002/...
comment in response to
post
Regret rate is at 1%.
Children don't get body parts cut off.
Nobody is forcing or manipulating them.
Being Trans, same as bi or homosexual is perfectly normal for some people.
Thx for coming to my Ted talk.