jaineneira.bsky.social
Not sure if I’m fleeing Twitter or if I’m there for the chaos
Follow me for inane observations and sometime rants, I guess
Oh, and film stuff cos I write sometimes.
640 posts
90 followers
24 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
This was my first thought. It's not her clothes, people are judging *her body*. Simply being breastily endowed somehow makes us sluts.
comment in response to
post
How is this helpful? Do you want a congratulations?
comment in response to
post
...for reserved seating. Every single train thus far (plus replacement trains) have all been cancelled. We hold out little hope for our remaining 3 Deutsche Bahn bookings. We will be encouraging everyone we encounter to avoid Deutsche Bahn at all costs.
comment in response to
post
Very much too old to be a zoomer, but nice try
comment in response to
post
Guessing you've never been a woman in service
comment in response to
post
Whoops, someone feels called out for creeping on servers
comment in response to
post
Exactly
comment in response to
post
I think there's a reading comprehension issue here
comment in response to
post
As a teenager I had a grown man come close to assaulting me because he didn't like hearing me swear. Whose behaviour was more inappropriate?
comment in response to
post
This really says more about your sex life than it does about his
comment in response to
post
People message on socials and it's pretty common to add your partner's friends, but I would never message a friend's partner like that. And if my friend asked me to they'd cease to be my friend.
comment in response to
post
Shit humans for doing it
comment in response to
post
There's been a bunch like that on here.
comment in response to
post
I'll never understand these people messaging their friend's partners to say they went too far. Who does that?
comment in response to
post
I mean. If you can't follow a conversation in real time that's on you 🤷🏼
comment in response to
post
You can look back at your own comments. I don't need to screenshot them for you. I'm not going to comment twice to reply to you in two places. I'll trust you to figure out how to follow all threads.
comment in response to
post
So you don't realise you've replied in a thread to me more than once. Gotcha.
comment in response to
post
You're clearly not reading what I've actually written, given I specifically said a 2 year gap and you're talking about 17 year olds with 13 year olds...
comment in response to
post
Where I live R&J laws are capped at 2 years, so a 13 year old could only be with a 15 year old. With this allowance the only ones I find uncomfortable is 16-18. Where one is still quite young and the other can legally drink, vote, etc (where I live).
comment in response to
post
I'm gonna chalk this up to a language issue.
comment in response to
post
Again, I honestly don't know what you're trying to say. It's a drastic from the study I posted...
comment in response to
post
I honestly don't know what you're trying to say. That's where this QI fact comes from. Not an assumption. And definitely not 'common sense'...
comment in response to
post
Too young/gentile for bridge I fear.
comment in response to
post
For me that is a baker's dozen.
comment in response to
post
Even then, he can just make his own dinner.
I completely agree he's a cretin regardless.
comment in response to
post
Romeo and Juliet laws make the most sense, though I don't believe it should ever be illegal for young people to have sex with each other, only for adults to have sex with children. Like criminalising prostitution doesn't protect sex workers, it only makes things worse for them.
comment in response to
post
If they've been dating for two years and are born an hour apart it's rape just in that one hour? There's nuance.
comment in response to
post
Tennis metaphors won't get you anywhere with me
comment in response to
post
I'm also against getting married before 25, but kids are going to have sex, in large part due to that lack if impulse control! Criminalising sex/pro abstinence laws will only hurt them.
comment in response to
post
Those two things aren't reconcilable. If you want a strict age of consent you are advocating for abstinence - which is proven not to work. Criminalisation is proven not to work. All that would do is send consenting 16 year olds to prison for doing what all teenagers do. Consent laws protect kids.
comment in response to
post
I interpreted it as 'a minor'. Hence 17.
comment in response to
post
...inappropriate for that one month. Their relationship hasn't changed, there's no difference to the power imbalance, but he's reached a random age. That's the definition of arbitrary.
comment in response to
post
That is a ridiculous expectation. Say they've been dating and having sex for two years (where age of consent is 16 so perfectly legal) and their birthdays are a month apart. There's one month in the middle of their 2+ year relationship where they need to stop having sex because it's only...
comment in response to
post
Say they were both 17 and already sexually active, then he had a birthday. They should stop until her birthday? '18' is arbitrary, it's the age gap that matters, particularly under 25 when things are still developing.
comment in response to
post
He could have been 18 having sex with 17 year olds and not be a pedophile. He's phrased it badly for sure, and that still doesn't excuse a much older man being with underage girls.
comment in response to
post
There is literally no way to make this assumption like this from common sense. I'd like to know how you reached that conclusion.
It's a statistic, from a study performed at UCLA.
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
comment in response to
post
It's a statistic
comment in response to
post
Not the same thing though is it. A fair comparison would be if you were trying to learn how to not be misogynistic and transphobic and the feminists et al actively worked against you educating yourself.
comment in response to
post
Yeah I'm kinda anti-transphobes and people who befriend them personally.
comment in response to
post
My feelings were never hurt, but my ability to seek help was impeded. Insane behaviour.
comment in response to
post
If someone attacked you and anyone who tried to help you learn about trans people and pronouns but was friends with transphobes, wouldn't you question everything they said and believed in?
comment in response to
post
I was on the internet, asking for help from locals about sourcing stuff, and she attacked people trying to help me so I couldn't get answers.
What's wild is vegans who attack vegetarians actively working towards veganism while saying nothing to meat eaters.
comment in response to
post
Except that I was literally trying to change. It's a process and I was looking for help making changes. She jumped on me and anyone trying to assist me. So I gave up.
She was allowed to make incremental changes for the better (initially cutting out fish), why wasn't I allowed to learn and grow?
comment in response to
post
Apparently vegetarians are worse than meat eaters.
Even though they themselves started by cutting out fish.
comment in response to
post
In large part because a vegan friend who'd said nothing about me being a meat-eater went on the attack about my journey towards veganism and prevented me from getting any assistance.
comment in response to
post
Sure. But the person you're arguing with never claimed that?
comment in response to
post
I only heard his voice for the first time today. What on earth is going on there?
comment in response to
post
He looks like he's related to Mel Gibson.