janetbufton.ca
Canadian mum, 3D liberal in Babylon
Writing collected at janetbufton.ca
diversity dynamism democracy Detroit Lions
Elbows up.
2,696 posts
2,898 followers
399 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
I got lectured on here recently for being an insufficiently deontological libertarian. The vibes are different, but you can find diversity on both. Otherwise, one skews right, tolerates Nazis, and preens over its diversity. The other skews left, has scolds you can block, and knows it skews left.
comment in response to
post
Friends did tell me this but I'm not sure you can believe it enough until it happens.
comment in response to
post
@oregonzoo.bsky.social @gettoknownature.bsky.social
@stevewaycott.bsky.social
@woodlandparkzoo.bsky.social
are a good start!
comment in response to
post
I wonder if there was a big fight about whether it's better with Miracle Whip.
comment in response to
post
*until
darnit
comment in response to
post
I actually believe this tastes ok you get to mayonnaise *on the side*.
comment in response to
post
And they say Bluesky doesn't have it all.
comment in response to
post
(And, of course, because it's so rare there is no evidence that it does either of those things.)
comment in response to
post
Libertarians also care about the magnitude of a problem and the costs of its proposed solution. In this case, even if gender-affirming surgery for kids had bad outcomes, it is vanishingly rare. The proposal is to interfere with the healthcare of millions of people to stop a handful of procedures.
comment in response to
post
That said, MPS has always been fusionist, and we know that not all the fusionist libertarians, let alone all the conservatives, ended up where I'd have liked.
comment in response to
post
I have to review this and talk to some people, but most of the examples QS gives are something like, "He was a member of MPS". At the time? Earlier? Later? Was his work tolerated?
I'm disappointed by connections but don't feel like I got enough information to know it was ever lousy with racists.
comment in response to
post
Please let me know what you think. More to come in this series. oll.libertyfund.org/publications...
comment in response to
post
Most on here are likely hostile to libertarians—with good reason, sadly—but when I was in that world, many of us believed in it for the right reasons. David wasn’t perfect, but as I mention in a follow-up essay, that proximity to David correlates strongly w/ vehement anti-Trumpism is not coincidence
comment in response to
post
Specifically, the ahistoricism diminishes—if not flat out erases—the conflicts that have made America a beacon of freedom around the world.
Indeed, MAGA’s identitarian Christian nationalism is anathema to any reasonable concept of freedom.
comment in response to
post
I was aware of it here but I didn't get buried in it until I was pregnant and postpartum so both perceived as a person wanting "wellness" advice for everything and someone for whom normal medicine doesn't have slam-dunk answers.
comment in response to
post
It would be more surprising if there weren't a pile of ✨wellness✨ folks in a place with the physical environment of Boulder, but it doesn't surprise me that it's possible to be unaware if you're not in the adjacent spaces.
comment in response to
post
I think about this breakdown of Russell Brand's cursed journey (which I expected not to be interested in at all) often.
comment in response to
post
Came here to say this.
comment in response to
post
We saw The Arkells open for a Calgary band called The Dudes, but The Arkells were called Charlemagne and had only played a few shows. The venue could hold like fifty people. Amazing show.
comment in response to
post
You found it: the single instance in which I wouldn't hate it.
comment in response to
post
Congrats!
comment in response to
post
In Detroit, for me, the answer was normally, "and then someone took pity on the poor, lost Canadian..."
comment in response to
post
Too often, the self-styled “liberty movement” ignores context—like imposed inequality (de facto segregation)—or, worse, refuses to jettison racism from its own ranks in some misguided free speech crusade.
You can protect someone’s right to be abhorrent without putting them on stage. And yet.
comment in response to
post
This part reminds me very much of @jacobtlevy.bsky.social's discussion in Political Libertarianism of particular public power, a force against which the hate-the-state libertarians have been, at *best*, useless.
comment in response to
post
This part reminds me very much of @jacobtlevy.bsky.social's discussion in Political Libertarianism of particular public power, a force against which the hate-the-state libertarians have been, at *best*, useless.
comment in response to
post
We both know how he'd be chuckling rn
comment in response to
post
Horowitz strikes him even posthumously!
comment in response to
post
Each Lee and Hume were noxious concessive to existing slavery, but were opposed to slavery. They stood at an important frontier in anti slavery thought. Held back from more extreme views by nothing but their racist beliefs.
comment in response to
post
The desire of sincerely believing you are better than the others is hard to satisfy, domineering manufactures ‘humbler company’ in a way that lets you believe you’re superior.
Esp if slavery purports to aim at sthng other than pride while delivering returns to it.
comment in response to
post
Thus they suppose the innovation is an unproductive innovation, motivated and discovered by ‘laziness’ service to which comes at the ‘expence of the master.’
No innovations discovered: mental inferiority
Discovered: moral inferiority, trivial mental capacity.
comment in response to
post
When they don’t innovate, but are free to, I suppose they have low mental capacity.
Slaves do have dis/incentives to work less, and less painfully.
Having this dominant incentive, the master takes any innovation slaves discover to be unproductive abridgements of labour.