jeffwhaley.bsky.social
He/him.
745 posts
260 followers
196 following
Discussion Master
comment in response to
post
Of the two, he was the one who pissed me off the most, so no.
comment in response to
post
Fuck both people in that tweet.
comment in response to
post
Like truly fuck this centrist "right way" to protest bullshit.
comment in response to
post
I'm sure I won't agree.
comment in response to
post
What message? That Dems don't do this same shit when they're in charge even though they objectively do?
comment in response to
post
The op didn't present a question. They made the objectively false statement that this type of militarized police action doesn't happen under Democrats when it absolutely does. That is the message you're defending.
comment in response to
post
You think the cops aren't going to follow you all? You understand what kettling is right? When the cops decide to attack people they're not going to let you "just leave".
comment in response to
post
So what happens when the guards are there 24/7? Just stop protesting altogether?
comment in response to
post
Except the message in the original post is an objective lie. It's not whataboutism to call it a lie.
comment in response to
post
BLM started in 2014 there champ.
comment in response to
post
So the problem had nothing to do with it being the 90s and everything to do with it being where you lived.
comment in response to
post
TNA and ROH helped me stay a wrestling fan as a teenager.
comment in response to
post
A whole bunch of showsI can't remember at the moment that just ran for 1 or 2 seasons. Fox kids, WB kids, and ABC kids all had saturday morning blocks.
comment in response to
post
As a nineties kid, what are you talking about?; There were tons of saturday morning cartoons. Batman: The Animated Series, Superman: The Animated Series, Power Rangers(not a cartoon but still counts), Gargoyles, X-Men, Reboot, Transformers: Beast Wars, Batman Beyond,...
comment in response to
post
You know who else who influenced people's thoughts and votes? Kamala Harris. You know who's to blame for Kamala Harris, not getting enough votes? Kamala Harris and her campaign. End of story. Her shitty campaign gave us Trump, period.
comment in response to
post
This is so fucking stupid and an objectively bad thing to do.
comment in response to
post
She is a regular contributor on a @coolzonemedia.bsky.social podcast It Could Happen Here that is a daily leftist podcast that is a must listen to.
comment in response to
post
If your accurate and credible information came from the police department, it is neither accurate or credible.
comment in response to
post
This is absolutely the perfect response.
comment in response to
post
Because they are.
comment in response to
post
Because Liz Cheney is a weird Republican. It would hurt the authenticity of labeling Republicans weird to then campaign with one of them. Liz Cheney is a garbage human that should not be rehabilitated.
comment in response to
post
Do you honestly think Joe would have won? Kamala lost because she's stuck with Joes election strategy and didn't distance herself from him enough.
comment in response to
post
So do you think Kamala Harris should have kept with Tim Walz's instincts of calling the republicans weird instead of campaigning with Liz Cheney?
comment in response to
post
How does punching left make you not like other democrats when that's what the majority of democrats always do?
comment in response to
post
Auntie Donna!
comment in response to
post
Dude, if i'm gonna pay $50 for a show, I want to get my money's worth.
comment in response to
post
He is concerned about it because he absolutely thinks his digital consciousness will still be around then. He is so disconnected from reality that his only fear is not being able to live for eternity.
comment in response to
post
No. It's the messaging that's the problem. Kamala's messaging it was horrible. It started out good when her and Tim Walz were calling republicans weird until Biden campaign managers and her billionaire brother in law told her to stop.
comment in response to
post
Because he doesn't capitulate to the conservative messaging like Kamala did. Going to those places is fine. Bragging about being endorsed by Dick Cheney is not. Saying, you want to the US to have the "most lethal fighting force in the world" is not okay.
comment in response to
post
No, but campaigning with Liz fucking Cheney for weeks before that was.
comment in response to
post
Yeah. And that fucking sucks. That's a huge fucking failing on his part.
comment in response to
post
Because she was a horrible candidate, that's campaigned to the right to try and get Republicans to vote for her, alienating a bunch of her base.
comment in response to
post
Ok. And that fucking sucks of Bernie. He shouldn't have voted for those 2.
comment in response to
post
You do ads explaining why
They/them = you. You counter the message by attacking it instead of ignoring it, which is what Kamala did.
comment in response to
post
To make sure the people in power actually represent us. Ideally by making their lives miserable if they fuck us over. Politicians who vote against the public interest should not be given a moment of peace in public.
comment in response to
post
It was a right wing persuasion tool long before it was infiltrated by Russia. That change happened in the 70s.
comment in response to
post
It does in that it shows that they're willing to disrupt and fight back. They need to be as annoying as the Republicans have been to them when Dems are in power. They keep trying to compromise with fascists, and it doesn't look good
comment in response to
post
I've been around for the last 8 years. They haven't been trying to sell it. They've been trying to placate the loudest voices and then completely ignore them when they're actually in power. Remember Biden's public health care option that never happened, even though he campaigned on it?
comment in response to
post
I absolutely think they should be doing those things. I used medicare, for all as an example of a a position they could have been making popular over the last eight years, and yet have actively chosen to undermine at every single step.
comment in response to
post
Yeah and while that's a lot better than most other Dem Senators, it still sucks that they voted for Rubio.
comment in response to
post
And why haven't the democrats been doing that for the last eight fucking years?
comment in response to
post
I'm very confused by everything you're saying. And I don't know how you get all of those assumptions from me.
comment in response to
post
Huh? When I said "go there" I meant go to the places you were suggesting and spread those popular ideas. Something they could have been doing for the last eight years and have actively chose to not do.
comment in response to
post
Huh?
comment in response to
post
I can be mad at how badly they use their minority powers. Adam schiff is still voting for trump nominees. Democrats aren't actually trying to stop things and be a nuisance.
comment in response to
post
Because talking about it now and making it very popular is how we get it to pass when we are in power.
comment in response to
post
It doesn't. But this whole thread is about the Democrats making ideas popular instead of capitulating to popular polls. Medicare for all is a very popular idea that you don't hear Democrats talk about. I am simply using that as an example.
comment in response to
post
I'm mad because they're not doing enough to fight it when they're not in power. And also, they don't fight for it when they're in power, they're just not actively trying to take it away, which is not good enough for me.
comment in response to
post
Why do you think it would be bad?
comment in response to
post
So go there and spread medicare for all in those places. They could have been doing that for the last eight years and constantly reject it because their corporate donors don't like it.