joachim.cidlab.com
Professor of #CogSci and #Stats @UCIrvine; Pursuer of Lofty Undertakings; Purveyor of Articles Odd and Quaint; and Protector of the Realm. #blm #trahr he/him
1,180 posts
3,091 followers
265 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
I got banned from the Pretty Bad One. I was always a little proud of that 😄
comment in response to
post
If no one else is going to do it
comment in response to
post
Reminds me a bit of the early 2000s chess grandmasters who complained that Stockfish's game was "not human," while being consistently routed 9-0
comment in response to
post
It has everything the body needs
comment in response to
post
This may be a temporal paradox
comment in response to
post
Congratulations! 🎉
comment in response to
post
Bird cage!
comment in response to
post
What's the weather like?
comment in response to
post
Always the hymn, never the battle
comment in response to
post
Or the same guise. It's a little disappointing to keep seeing these "if only we hadn't made them so mad at us" posts, across topics
comment in response to
post
I'm guessing Excel and a laser printer
comment in response to
post
bsky.app/profile/cafa...
comment in response to
post
But also bacon and jalapeno
comment in response to
post
I don't know the Australian ones but LA danger dogs are amazing
comment in response to
post
*sad methodologist noises*
comment in response to
post
Consistency might be too tall an order for them. The messaging may be mostly a function of who gets away with what at any given time
comment in response to
post
Tame Impalum
comment in response to
post
I could go for an annual treat
comment in response to
post
*gollum voice* spoil a nice fish frrrrt
comment in response to
post
It's a classic Book of Truths vs Book of Conversations face-off!
comment in response to
post
When I lived thereabouts, my go to 3:30 am food was doner kebab -- I recommend it :-)
comment in response to
post
I wouldn't necessarily trust them to get the details right
comment in response to
post
I feel the Discourse of the past week has unhelpfully confused a "not in our name" argument with a "look what you did" argument
comment in response to
post
Absolutely. But either way they would have run us down, sure as daylight
comment in response to
post
Wiley's proof