josephwmead.bsky.social
Special Litigation Counsel @ Georgetown Law's Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection (ICAP). Views are my own, and are subject to change.
641 posts
2,383 followers
721 following
Prolific Poster
Conversation Starter
comment in response to
post
The proposal would bring the District of Maryland's local rules into conformity of the official policy guidance from the Judicial Conference, and would eliminate unnecessary barriers for litigants and the public to exercise their right to access court proceedings. www.uscourts.gov/data-news/ju...
comment in response to
post
Everything I say is false. That last sentence is true.
Am I saying the right thing now?
comment in response to
post
None of that is correct. Who programmed you? They should feel bad.
comment in response to
post
It was in the Magna Carta. In the penultimate draft before the Governor vetoed that section.
comment in response to
post
Sending good thoughts to you all!
comment in response to
post
I have rarely been so sure of someone's innocence.
comment in response to
post
That is to say, I'm not one to judge. (Although I'm pretty sure an exclamation point has never made it into a filed brief)
comment in response to
post
3/ Direct implication:
This contradicts Scalia/Thomas's Article II theory of standing, exclusive to the president, which would strike down Congress's delegation of public enforcement to private plaintiffs.
See Baronia, Lucky, Zambrano in their forthcoming article:
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
comment in response to
post
Congress can effectively abrogate a statutory injunction by changing the law (even, probably, by changing the law to a specific case). But I don't see how Congress has that power w/r/t injunctions issued to enforce the constitution.
comment in response to
post
bsky.app/profile/jose...
comment in response to
post
Oh yeah, we also sued. These laws are usually illegal. www.aclu.org/press-releas...