jpwkeeper.bsky.social
1,287 posts
218 followers
645 following
Getting Started
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
And that, in a nutshell, explains MAGA.
comment in response to
post
Tucker is good at what he does, despite the fact that most of the time we can't enjoy it because he does it for evil (and bears no small responsibility for today's mess).
When he, on this very rare occasion, does it for good we get that brief moment in time where we can appreciate it.
comment in response to
post
I'm not 100% clear what they're even for.
What can they do that the FBI, US Marshals, or local law enforcement can't?
comment in response to
post
Well, hopefully no literal fallout...
comment in response to
post
Over in the bad place, he's claiming he was 100% exonerated.
He does realize that if we're reading that we have access to the internet, right?
comment in response to
post
Oh man, imagine the music at such a parade.
comment in response to
post
And when they do, they are vilified by both sides for doing much less than that one political party does every day.
comment in response to
post
And yet I know dogs who will not only dive down but bark at it while underwater.
comment in response to
post
Over in the bad place, sock puppets are in overdrive:
1. Saying he was Dem
2. Saying his not being charged with 1st degree is because he's Dem
comment in response to
post
You need to get over that.
He won because Americans are oddly susceptible to disinformation.
We need to learn to fight that or we'll keep losing.
comment in response to
post
Yeah, let's see how those stairs feel in a day or two.
comment in response to
post
Generally speaking most people get that you don't say things in official mediums (or court) without evidence, unlike places like social media or Fox news where you know nobody will check the source.
I guess RFKJ didn't get that memo.
comment in response to
post
Tell me, had Donald Trump dropped out of the race at the same time, who would have run in his place? Would an other primary have been run to pick his successor?
comment in response to
post
And yet he testified in front of congress no less than 3 times, including in his opening statement, that Russia did indeed interfere int he 2016 election.
When pressed, he also admitted that Don Jr. and Paul Manafort met with Russian intelligence to get dirt on clinton, thus collusion.
comment in response to
post
The MAGAs start the video where they are dragging him out and he isn't cooperating to try to show that he was lunging at her.
Conveniently clipping the part of the video where he asked her a question.
comment in response to
post
Over in the bad place, the sock puppet farms are pushing the narrative hard that the Senator "Charged" at her.
They back it up by showing video from where they were trying to drag him out and he wasn't cooperating.
Disinformation is so much easier than the truth, it makes me afraid for the future.
comment in response to
post
He's counting on his side being the ones to write history.
comment in response to
post
A huge part of what is wrong with society right now stems from people wanting quick, easy answers to really complex problems.
And convicting Don is a really complex problem.
Durham told the truth about Trump/Russia and nobody listened.
comment in response to
post
That is a lie.
And it ended up here because Democrats have zero idea how to combat MAGA disinformation, not because Mueller didn't rush a case to trial that he probably would have lost if he had.
If we don't learn that lesson and instead look for simple scapegoats, things won't get better.
comment in response to
post
No, he didn't.
Garland knows that if you rush such a case to trial, you get an acquittal. Trump is really good about surrounding himself with fall guys and leaving himself plausible deniability.
comment in response to
post
My blood glucose just went up 20 points from reading that.
comment in response to
post
Never, ever, try to solve a political problem with the justice system.
The people who witnessed what they did and voted for Trump anyway are responsible.
comment in response to
post
I won't lie, I fully expected you to say that you wanted your consciousness to be transferred into a genetically engineered super soldier and THEN have your old body blown up.
comment in response to
post
I have legit never seen this before (East Coast).
comment in response to
post
Man leaves work after tragic death of wife, but returns to work after tragic death of dog.
comment in response to
post
Here is my issue with this:
All but 7 states use all human readable paper ballots.
Of the 7 that don't, 6 are deep red (plus NJ)
You can't hack paper, and even a cursory audit would show the discrepancy (and every precinct does batch audits every election).
comment in response to
post
You obviously don't have a dog.
I call the bunnies that hang out in my yard Potential Rotator Cuff Tears (my dog is REALLY strong).
comment in response to
post
That one in the middle be like:
comment in response to
post
It won't. Because she didn't.
All but 7 states use human readable paper ballots. Of the 7 that don't, 6 are deep red (plus NJ).
Any counting machine tampering would be caught in real-time or during batch audits, which every single precinct does every election.
comment in response to
post
The biggest issue with "The Other Place" isn't the people at all.
It's the fact that Musk monetized the sock puppet industry, and now like 80% of the traffic over there are people being paid to be cantankerous. You can't reason with someone like that.
comment in response to
post
I said in the bad place that at least 3 women had been prosecuted for miscarriages.
He challenged me to name them.
When I googled to get their names,I found out it was WAY more. Over 20 in Alabama alone.
comment in response to
post
I'd like to believe this is all made up and that wouldn't be anyone's actual response.
But, sadly, I fear I'd be wrong.
Men need to not suck. I don't get why it's so hard for so many.
comment in response to
post
Pad See Ew is one of the things I miss the most living the Low Carb Life.
comment in response to
post
Musk paid 44 billion dollars to turn Twitter into the largest single disinformation site in history.
He immediately weaponized sock puppet farms by offering their accounts blue checks for 8 dollars and no verification, giving them extended reach.
Need any more details?
comment in response to
post
I went through all of this in 2020.
If you want to cheat at an election, changing votes just isn't a viable strategy.
The strategy is use disinformation to sway voters and/or pass legislation suppressing voters statistically unlikely to vote for you.
comment in response to
post
Once again, you'd have to compromise every auditor in every precinct in an entire state. And then repeat that for every swing state.
Someone would get caught, or talk.
comment in response to
post
In order to do so you would have to involve hundreds of people spread across every precinct in a state and they'd have to pull it off while under the watch of vote observers from both parties as it would have to be by hand. You'd never pull it off without someone being caught.
comment in response to
post
Don't start with that. You cannot prove or disprove voter fraud with mathematics.
You do it with audits, which every precinct in every state does every election.
Even a batch audit will show tampering very clearly, and it didn't.
Recognize that it was disinformation that won this election
comment in response to
post
Boy he's smug little effer isn't he.
comment in response to
post
You can't rig paper ballots.
All but 7 states use all human readable paper ballots.
Of the 7 that don't, 6 are deep red (plus NJ)
If he tampered with vote counters or tally machines batch audits, which every precinct does, would have exposed it.
comment in response to
post
He's not wrong.
Without Musk buying twitter and mobilizing it into a disinformation machine that rivals even the Right Wing news by opening the floodgates to sock puppet farms Trump likely loses this election.
comment in response to
post
I wouldn't call it Random though...
comment in response to
post
What cracks me up is Rand Paul gets decked for being a jackass of a neighbor and you guys want to throw the book at the guy who did it.
This guy gets killed and you're all like "yeah, but he was being a dick".
comment in response to
post
As far as planned, you don't think him rolling up on them with a gun in broad daylight was something he planned, especially if it turns out that he's the one who posed their dog's skull for them to find?