kangtc.bsky.social
FPL x Films
Letterboxd profile KangTC https://boxd.it/RPhT
1,233 posts
654 followers
1,086 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
I'm finding that if you search say three key words it will madlib a story about them rather than just say it can't find anything.
comment in response to
post
I think the problem is that the word Moneyball is used pejoratively by Proper Football Men. It just means buy low, sell high.
comment in response to
post
I definitely get the feeling that connections are recycled as red herrings and vice versa.
comment in response to
post
Is it common knowledge that purple is always a word puzzle? I only learned this from discussion on the Connections Companion page.
comment in response to
post
At least it was Euro centric today.
comment in response to
post
Whisper it but aren't Brighton a bit like this too?
comment in response to
post
Letterboxd has a thing for this. Independent of the star rating you can give it a 🧡.
comment in response to
post
When I say take a chance I mean as nailed on a bet as you can possibly get. I wouldn't even give Mark Kermode a veto over which films I see at the cinema.
comment in response to
post
If it was perfect for you then that that is 5*. Maybe it will only be 4* for us but that is still good.
comment in response to
post
Currently 93% on RT. Worth a gamble surely?
comment in response to
post
One where you need to think like an American (ugh!)
Connections
Puzzle #739
🟨🟨🟨🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟪🟪🟪🟪
🟦🟦🟦🟦
comment in response to
post
youtu.be/mJpNmYeooQE?...
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
Leaving aside the random stuff that they try and foist on us we probably follow more accounts than we can keep up with. They have to triage.
comment in response to
post
How many friends have you got? Less than fifty and you could do this with the Favourites feed.
comment in response to
post
You might be able to access it by clicking that you are not interested in a specific suggested post.
comment in response to
post
Newcastle seem to be planning ahead so perhaps not yet is good.
comment in response to
post
www.theguardian.com/film/2025/ju....
comment in response to
post
www.telegraph.co.uk/films/0/f1-t....
comment in response to
post
I engage with it via each individual journalist's page. For example:
observer.co.uk/contributor/...
comment in response to
post
If 22,000 is good why not play in a smaller stadium? These problems aren't a bolt from the blue.
comment in response to
post
Presumably they are at work. Peril of playing weekday games on European time.
comment in response to
post
This is the problem with football matches that no one cares about. The articles have to be about something else.
comment in response to
post
I've found I'm enjoying it more after abandoning the need to keep up the streak. I just play a few when it suits me.
comment in response to
post
I'm surprised that City for example haven't taken the chance to get some ringers in on short term deals in this transfer window.
comment in response to
post
They won't be under the same crushing pressure if no one has a computer playing for them. It might even help them.
comment in response to
post
This is Bluesky you know! I wouldn't count players with release clauses. They should try to do more business like that because they are institutionally incapable of negotiating well.
comment in response to
post
Occam's Razor suggests he chose the clown show in the Champions League. You'd think that United would have made a move for Gyokeres already if they had second thoughts about Delap.
comment in response to
post
More like this for me:
comment in response to
post
I hope that they have a striker lined up. If not it seems a bit self indulgent.
comment in response to
post
I don't think United are capable of signing a first team player for £30m.
comment in response to
post
United are where they are because they have been kidding themselves that they are signing elite players when all they need are good ones.
comment in response to
post
Fans of certain clubs are stuck in the era of having to make excuses for their lack of success by making it all about net spend. This is despite their clubs being successful now and having money to spend.
comment in response to
post
I felt seen when Rory said it was the "wanky wanky podcast for smug snobs".
comment in response to
post
Straight to streaming seems to mean obscene amount of money spent on actors these days.