katyeiseman.bsky.social
53 posts
44 followers
39 following
Prolific Poster
Conversation Starter
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
I’ve been thinking we’ve got to stay focused on what they all agree on — that’s still the scariest part of this dystopia
comment in response to
post
I think you're right that the org is no longer involved; I noticed the withdrawal, too, but it was your post (as I obsessively search "Boasberg" & "Xinis" here) that made me look into what they are up to. Nearly impossible to keep track of all the fights as an observer, let alone litigating any!
comment in response to
post
Can you explain what is going on in the appeals court? This was two weeks ago; no motion to dismiss followed ...
comment in response to
post
I think that the current Military Appreciation Month doesn't count because it was proposed by John McCain, who was canceled by the MAGA GOP.
comment in response to
post
Can't speak to = Not allowed to speak to
comment in response to
post
And does inadvertently cc-ing a journalist negate privilege? Asking for a friend.
comment in response to
post
Judge, why not frame this as an Order To Show Cause?
comment in response to
post
As wrong as she is about the applicability of the law, even this Trump-appointed judge is saying that people need three-weeks' notice, not 12 hours or less.
comment in response to
post
Isn't that the version filed by Plaintiff's attorneys?
comment in response to
post
They got the memo— the problem is *critical* race theory, not wholesome, old-fashioned race theory
comment in response to
post
What we've missed is whatever was discussed in a closed court proceeding; today 14 news orgs filed a motion to get unsealed all the documents that were filed under seal - we'll see what happens! I imagine Xinis had a good reason (& plaintiffs attorneys agreed) for docs to be under seal; unclear why!
comment in response to
post
Discovery documents are not normally part of the public docket -- there could be reams of documents, transcripts of depositions, etc, for the lawyers to go through and chose what to put in as evidence
comment in response to
post
On the last day, the govt asked for more time; Xinis said no, and resumed the discovery process - written responses from gov't due Monday 5/5; depositions also to take place next week: storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
comment in response to
post
Is everyone keeping an eye on Bluebonnet? Outside the class covered by this ruling, so even more at risk than when the detainees there sent out the SOS yesterday