Profile avatar
kentjones.bsky.social
509 posts 80 followers 30 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
comment in response to post
Dissenter #1 - Justice Clarence Thomas Trump now benefits from Thomas’s dissent in another controversial case—immigration under the Alien Enemies Act. This is what many legal ethicists and political historians would call the gray zone of influence.
comment in response to post
comment in response to post
comment in response to post
“Committed” and “massive” do a lot of heavy lifting here. Many plants predate him or rely on bipartisan incentives.
comment in response to post
That’s not how trade works. Not doing business doesn’t “save” money—it just means lost exports, higher prices, and supply chain headaches. A trade deficit isn’t a bill; it’s a measure of exchange. Trump’s math is campaign math, not economic math.
comment in response to post
You’re right—But some gave it without knowing. My parents never logged on, never scrolled. Fox still moved in. Influence doesn’t need permission—just presence. So yes, stop feeding it, but don’t forget who’s already been fed.
comment in response to post
Sure, personal responsibility matters—that’s obvious. But stopping there misses the point. We need to look at how the system profits off young people’s limited options and poor guidance. That’s the deeper issue worth critiquing.
comment in response to post
The bigger issue isn’t kids needing budgeting classes — and your right to point that out — but, it’s a rigged system that traps young people with inescapable debt while lenders and colleges profit. Critique the exploiters, not just the exploited.
comment in response to post
Restarting student loan payments will hit low-income Americans the hardest. Those earning under $25K could lose up to 90% of their spending money, while higher earners lose much less. This could hurt local economies and widen financial gaps.
comment in response to post
Columbus Day was never abolished. It’s a federal holiday. Some cities chose to add Indigenous Peoples’ Day alongside it. Trump’s “reinstatement” is pure theater—like throwing a parade for a ship that never sank.
comment in response to post
comment in response to post
comment in response to post
comment in response to post
Bill trying a bit too hard to stay edgy by giving Trump props. Let’s not pretend effectiveness erases the dumpster fire of consequences.
comment in response to post
Trump’s Playbook: Win, Then Ruin It.
comment in response to post
Yep—textbook Trump: big promise, no blueprint, all gamble, and a mess left for someone else to clean up.
comment in response to post
The IRS is flawed, but replacing it with a buzzword and no plan is fiscal chaos dressed as patriotism.
comment in response to post
Imagine being so fragile that Big Bird feels like a threat. Defunding NPR and PBS won’t fix your image, Don—it just proves you’re scared of facts read calmly and in full sentences.
comment in response to post
If a law firm folds under political pressure, how can clients trust it to stand firm for them? Willkie Farr didn’t just compromise its reputation—it broadcast its price.
comment in response to post
Influence isn’t destroyed by criticism— it’s revealed by how you handle it. Loud reactions don’t prove the world’s against you. They prove the weight of your ego.
comment in response to post
Influence isn’t destroyed by criticism— it’s revealed by how you handle it. Loud reactions don’t prove the world’s against you. They prove the weight of your ego.
comment in response to post
We’ll be left with a pile of broken laws and a cover-up so cartoonish it makes Wile E. Coyote look like a master tactician.
comment in response to post
Who doesn’t like to watch a political train wreck? Thanks for the perspective.
comment in response to post
Probably while riding a dinosaur and using a rotary phone, with instructions written on the back of his Blockbuster card.
comment in response to post
When you can't build a wall, just build a barrier of unaffordable cars.
comment in response to post
When allies start warning their citizens about visiting the U.S., maybe it’s time we look in the mirror. Guns, rights rollbacks, and border chaos aren’t just local problems—they’re global headlines. 28.3% of the US know it, 29.2% are the problem, and 41% are too fucking lazy.
comment in response to post
Oh, Randy, you wannabe patriot pretending insurrectional fantasist Second Amendment LARPer.
comment in response to post
Pam is so dumb, she would sue a sandwich 'cause it made her full.
comment in response to post
Guy's so clueless, probably thinks 'campaign' is a bubbly adult beverage"
comment in response to post
Your confidence outshines your intelligence.
comment in response to post
Judge: “Save those Signal chats!” Feds: delete messages like a 15-year-old slamming the laptop shut when mom walks in. Signal’s privacy is so tight, even mom couldn’t find the browser history. Unless someone screenshotted, it’s all just red faces and wiped evidence.
comment in response to post
Judge: “Save those Signal chats!” Feds: delete messages like a 15-year-old slamming the laptop shut when mom walks in. Signal’s privacy is so tight, even mom couldn’t find the browser history. Unless someone screenshotted, it’s all just red faces and wiped evidence.
comment in response to post
You’re likely right. Especially considering who he is—insecure and trying to impress.
comment in response to post
Could an AI have been used to polish or brainstorm parts of it? Possibly. But the voice and rhythm lean strongly human. So if AI touched it at all, its role was minor.
comment in response to post
This is likely a human-written strategic memo or internal note. If AI generated it, it was heavily edited or prompted to mimic terse, real-world military or diplomatic language. It’s more likely that it’s fully human-written or human-drafted with minimal AI assistance, rather than a true mix.
comment in response to post
Prioritization format (e.g., numbered lists with short phrases) is typical of human briefing notes or emails. Emotional tone is subtly embedded (“we look indecisive,” “we are prepared to execute”), which AIs typically soften or neutralize unless prompted.
comment in response to post
Contextual urgency and subjective framing (“Biden failed,” “we look indecisive,” “we don’t get to start this on our own terms”) sound like real-time strategic thinking, possibly in a policy or military setting.
comment in response to post
ChatGPT Response: This text appears human-written, not AI-generated. Here’s the analysis: Human-like traits: Fragmented thoughts and incomplete sentences (“Brut.” or the cutoff after “which Biden”) suggest natural human drafting or notes.
comment in response to post
Pete Hegseth posted a Call of Duty mission briefing like it was a lunch menu.
comment in response to post
Pete Hegseth posted a Call of Duty mission briefing like it was a lunch menu.
comment in response to post
Autism rates have risen due to better awareness, broader diagnostic criteria, and improved screening—not a mystery cause. The “1 in 20,000” stat is inaccurate; historical data was limited and underdiagnosed.
comment in response to post
Trump sounds like he’s describing a hostage negotiation with imaginary law firms. “Where do I sign?” Yo, Dipshit, this isn’t a timeshare pitch—it’s just another word salad with extra dressing and zero receipts.
comment in response to post
Donald D Cups out here talking like he’s launching a skincare line called “Fertilization by 45.”
comment in response to post
If true, that’s not just reckless—it’s a flashing red siren. Ordering DoD staff to bypass infosec protocols to install Signal reeks of backchannel ops, shadow comms, and potential criminal exposure. National security isn’t a group chat—it’s the firewall.
comment in response to post
If Elon were behind this Signal mess, he’d be holed up in a server room right now, frantically smashing delete buttons.
comment in response to post
This was relayed by Rep. Frederica Wilson, who was with the family. Trump denied saying it, but Sgt. Johnson’s widow later confirmed it, saying it upset her deeply.
comment in response to post
You’re referring to the 2017 ambush in Niger, where four U.S. soldiers were killed. Trump’s response sparked outrage when he reportedly told the widow of Sgt. La David Johnson: “He knew what he signed up for, but I guess it still hurts.”
comment in response to post
Suddenly vanishes from Fox like she said “climate change” three times in a row.