Profile avatar
kevinmitchell50.bsky.social
A writer not a fighter… except in good causes. Sadly, despite noble resistance, the Observer (a very good cause) has now been thrown to the dogs of the marketplace by the Guardian, who proved to be, “an unreliable ally”.
495 posts 626 followers 733 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
Thanks for that. A key stat though is 29% of those tactical voters switched from Labour. Also, it was Lib Dems who also benefited hugely. Labour won back huge slices of its northern votes. Not as simple as saying Labour was gifted an anti-Tory vote.
comment in response to post
It’s like, “blah blah and more blah” with TACOS. The man is a coward, a bully and a liar.
comment in response to post
What estimates? By whom?For whom? Give me the numbers, names and dates.
comment in response to post
You asked them all, did you, these millions? Funny. Never knocked on my door.
comment in response to post
Let’s hope so!
comment in response to post
Still no match for Jim Higgs, who went runless through an entire Ashes tour. Legend.
comment in response to post
In the Guardian two days ago - but welcome, nonetheless.
comment in response to post
I did, Gaby. Just making the obvious point, perhaps. Nothing personal.
comment in response to post
That’s partly on the media, Gaby.
comment in response to post
It’s your call, mate - but maybe overestimating the impact of your departure?
comment in response to post
#WIvAus And Green goes for 3, caught in the gully. How can the Aussie selectors possibly think he’s a top-order bat? At best, a belligerent No7 and second-change bowler.
comment in response to post
Trump doesn’t so much resemble Hitler as Mussolini, with that jutting jaw, stiff neck and preposterous macho posturing. Thinks he’s a Mafia Don. More like Donna.
comment in response to post
Think it will crack up early. V patchy.
comment in response to post
Daft question in the first place, mate. We had has much control as anyone wanted, over borders and laws that mattered. Don’t fall for the false argument.
comment in response to post
Not just expelled. Charged and convicted.
comment in response to post
Yep. Simply put, the unvarnished truth.
comment in response to post
If you don’t bother, they get away with it.
comment in response to post
Yep. Look the other way. That’ll show ‘em. Ffs…
comment in response to post
A few salient points: Bull is no longer a practising doctor. Nor is he a politician anymore. He is an unelected figurehead of a company, not a political party. To avoid confusion when he no doubt makes his many appearances on Question Time…
comment in response to post
Reform making big play of this guy being in the telly. So was David Icke.
comment in response to post
Oh dear…
comment in response to post
Looking forward to this
comment in response to post
We’ve just started.
comment in response to post
Or like George Osborne did, wrecking the economic base of the country that will take years to fix.
comment in response to post
Meanwhile, the best attacking bowler in the country, Adil Rashid, remains in short-form mode, where he shines. Surely the fitness issues that forced him away from Test cricket have now passed. Or maybe he just doesn’t fancy the grind.
comment in response to post
Not sure anyone will lose. In London, for instance, it’s universal.
comment in response to post
Masterful deconstruction. I’ve had similar “conversations” where the apology becomes surreal, pathetic and scary.
comment in response to post
Inevitable, whatever the cut-off point is. Seems fair to set an earnings limit and link it to a tax return - and leave open the option to donate the payment to the NHS. Damned if they do, damned if they don’t.
comment in response to post
kyivindependent.com/enemy-bomber...
comment in response to post
Five parties aren’t in contention. That’s the point. It’s Labour, 10-1 the field. Ask any bookie.
comment in response to post
This is statistical nonsense. To win the required 326 seats to put Labour out of power, Farage and his motley crew would need a swing of 31% across the board! In hundreds of seats they’d need way more than that. They have precious few credible candidates, a rag-bag of nutters and misfits. So, not on