Profile avatar
krysdolega.bsky.social
Philosopher hiding among psychologists on the ERC EXPERIENCE project (http://erc-xp.ulb.be) He\Him www.krysdolega.xyz
232 posts 1,712 followers 1,076 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
Woah, that sounds way overbuilt. Have you tried Cairn? I think 2e is very good.
comment in response to post
šŸ“Œ
comment in response to post
šŸ“Œ
comment in response to post
šŸ“Œ
comment in response to post
Sure, but should that be a reason not to admit information into our ontology?
comment in response to post
Yes, I merely used his affiliation to frame the post
comment in response to post
Exactly! Dan thought information is real. He was very fond of this quote from Wiener: ā€œInformation is information, not matter or energy. No materialism which does not admit this can survive at the present day.ā€
comment in response to post
šŸ“Œ
comment in response to post
Damn, I wish I had thought of this before!
comment in response to post
I think you're right, he's more of a mischievous twink than a murder twink
comment in response to post
surely its Alcibiades
comment in response to post
šŸ“Œ
comment in response to post
Snap! That’s what I did today. Hope the coffee and the dissertation are good (mine were!)
comment in response to post
We used to play the 1st edition of the fantasy RPG back in my school days and the majority of classes fell somewhere between tax-collector and rat-catcher. I’m still amused by the fact that they distinguished between grave (corpses) and tomb (valuables) robbers.
comment in response to post
What the fuck, so sorry that people can be so vicious and that you and your kids have to experience this
comment in response to post
it's social psychology done by people without the stats background
comment in response to post
which is surprising given he’s a Bayesian
comment in response to post
comment in response to post
they don’t call it ā€˜accelerationism’ without reason
comment in response to post
@axc.bsky.social this is relevant for us, but you will also enjoy the acronym
comment in response to post
I don’t know how fast you can push that stroller, but those are some serious racing seatbelts!
comment in response to post
comment in response to post
Don't worry, this will not happen in our lifetime* *and if it does then it will mean we have far bigger problems on our plate
comment in response to post
Strange claim about anesthesiology there too. Seems like he means that anesthesiology nurses (rather than doctors) will become redundant, which fits the weirdly gendered profile of the article.
comment in response to post
This passage about Shūzō Kuki's explication of the aesthetic concept of Iki is from @chaykak.bsky.social 's Filterworld, which I highly recommend!
comment in response to post
šŸ“Œ
comment in response to post
šŸ“Œ
comment in response to post
It exists, but as far as I know isn't online yet. I'll send it your way once it is made public.
comment in response to post
As the J.F.K. inauguration parade photos show, the differences in how both sides displayed their military prowess were mostly in set dressing and space constraints.
comment in response to post
I keep seeing these leaks and I think Apple is really scrambling here: they clearly have no fresh ideas for where to take the iPhone, but following the lessons of the m-series MacBook redesign (e.g. fit a much larger battery that lasts 2+ days) would def hurt long-term sales, so they just Ive it
comment in response to post
As a result, that is an *extremely* fringe view that you don't come across in the wild all that much. There's nothing illiberal about treating people with contempt when they express odious, discredited views. Empathy is good as a general principle but it needs limits.
comment in response to post
in that case don’t ever google ā€œslavic yogaā€
comment in response to post
woah, didn’t think anyone could take on Chet Hanks and win
comment in response to post
Oh, my issue is rather that it’s too melodic and accessible. I think I’m just too used to mumbling and bellowing šŸ˜…
comment in response to post
Ok, so I dig the instrumental parts a lot, but I’m not entirely sold on the vocals. I think I bounced off them for this reason before, but I will give a few more listens. On the up side, it made listen to No Means No again.