labdavalos.bsky.social
Principal Investigator ππ½ https://lmdavalos.github.io/ Editor-in-Chief ππ½ @qrb.bsky.social/ recent Fulbright Amazonia scholar (https://www.fulbrightprogram.org/amazonia/), news from lab and beyond
233 posts
330 followers
190 following
Prolific Poster
Conversation Starter
comment in response to
post
isn't it cool that we had a whole system for "sustaining funding for US agriculture while also preventing death by starvation among the world's poor." looks like this was coordinated through a USDA-USAID partnership, so it's gone, courtesy of a particular billionaire.
comment in response to
post
yes, not currently doing pre-proposals
comment in response to
post
I was under the impression that pre proposals at DEB (and maybe IOS) were scrapped after correlation between pre proposal and proposal scores or ranks was weak.
comment in response to
post
You can also stop by IKEA and get meatballs.
comment in response to
post
Existential threat, meet milquetoast request from years ago.
comment in response to
post
Eventual?
comment in response to
post
Yeah but 90% IOS, DEB and MCB. Mostly emerging frontiers remains.
comment in response to
post
Right?
comment in response to
post
Postdoc fellowships also specifically listed.
comment in response to
post
And now I see itβs *only* -71.5%. Where is the edit button?
comment in response to
post
Certainly scientists understand the significance of getting NIH or NSF funding, but the general public doesn't. Federal funding is the silent work horse of global science, usually only mentioned as a string of numbers in the acknowledgements section.
comment in response to
post
@qrb.bsky.social check it out!
comment in response to
post
Wrong! Itβs a functional dire wolf now πΊ
comment in response to
post
To explain what is great about America compared to other countries, the pavilion emphasized:
1) US universities and the Fulbright program
2) leadership in science, especially biotech and pharma, led by NSF and NIH
3) diversity and being welcoming to all
4) NASA/space exploration
2/
comment in response to
post
I was gobsmacked by this article, its revisionism, its multiple false equivalencies, the uncritical acceptance of disingenuous 'just asking questions' arguments...
comment in response to
post
π€£
comment in response to
post
Right? The artefacts are amazing as well.