leifrt.bsky.social
653 posts
37 followers
22 following
Discussion Master
comment in response to
post
James Wiseman
comment in response to
post
I mixed that up, but the point works. That group is strong and needs to be on the air everywhere to get the message out.
comment in response to
post
Symone! Barack has the gravitas to make a difference, though. The other people are weak and feeble in comparison to the people you mentioned. Barack, Whitmer, Walz, Newsome, Beshear, Moore, Harris, Mayor Pete, Alexandria, Bernie, and those stronger types need to be out front. Invite to the show.
comment in response to
post
Oh my effing gawd; they were awful.
comment in response to
post
Fair.
comment in response to
post
What was this weird thing? What a goof.
comment in response to
post
Really, Bubby? Such a weak representation of a senator. Do better.
comment in response to
post
Especially in comparison to her opponent.
comment in response to
post
How can Sabalenka be so good, yet so...?
comment in response to
post
Hey Steven, what can you do to get Stephen Miller out of the government? Let's make this happen. Thanks. Seriously. Real investigations with real consequences.
comment in response to
post
How do we rid the country of him? Asking for a nation.
comment in response to
post
Why?
comment in response to
post
Thank you for calling out Stephen Miller today.
comment in response to
post
$800,000
comment in response to
post
What were JK's numbers before his ankle injury? Weren't those similar to his contribution after the All-Star game last year? Wait. You're going to say his numbers before his injury this year weren't winning, right? Was Brandin healthy then? Did Post exist at the time? Etc.. Hmm.. makes you wonder.
comment in response to
post
I think it means that he shouldn't go home, because he might not make it back? Crazy times.
comment in response to
post
Reece Beekman was an ideal guard for the Warriors' future. Defensive standout in college, 2 times ACC defensive player of the year. 14/3.6/6.2 as a senior. Wait. They sent him as an extra to the Nets. Why even have a draft?
comment in response to
post
Thank you for that segment. Now it's off to YouTube to hear more from that chat. That fella is kinda interesting.
comment in response to
post
Because I understand how aging works? Do better.
comment in response to
post
They were all broken or broken down by the end of the season.
comment in response to
post
James Wiseman is available and can handle that role, easily. Young big guys usually aren't useful. He's older now.
comment in response to
post
Their "prime"?
comment in response to
post
They hit the ball hard and easily could've had a couple of home runs with a little luck. They're good to go. That's why you play the game.
comment in response to
post
Great article that shows us the kids are alright. They've got this handled.
comment in response to
post
Does Spieth just screw around out there? 6 birdies AND 6 bogeys in one round! The guy is crazy. Does he lead the tour in the fewest pars per round? Hilarious.
comment in response to
post
Ya think?
comment in response to
post
We need desperately to win overwhelmingly in the midterms. This sucks.
comment in response to
post
Traded and then waived. Warriors ought to pick him up.
comment in response to
post
Um, that means they're eliminating Downs Syndrome kids.
comment in response to
post
The Nordic countries also invest in more prenatal screening leading to...the eradication of costly chromosomal abnormalities.
comment in response to
post
He hates top-end athletes... it's not difficult to understand. Something about any reminder of Michael Jordan and being athletic gets Kerr to park a guy on the bench.
comment in response to
post
Right? Has Mike met Steve? Coach Steve loves playing a group of guys who resemble himself as a player. He's not into playing athletes or big guys. The two of them might need to chat.
comment in response to
post
Accurate.
comment in response to
post
Absolutely!
comment in response to
post
It was confusing... anyway. It just depends on how much $$ Lacob wants to spend. He's always kept JK close regardless of all the trade talks.
comment in response to
post
I replied but you deleted???
comment in response to
post
.
comment in response to
post
Nice.
comment in response to
post
Yep, that huge Butler contract messed this up for everyone. Even though they offered a reported $30M last summer, he should sign for $20-30 for next year, and have it stepped up for 2-3 more years.
comment in response to
post
The reports were that they offered $30M per year last summer. Jonathan should sign anything from $25M and up. His agent screwed it up last year. Make it $25, then $30, then $35-40 in the 3rd year.
comment in response to
post
Your bud, Tim K. posted a picture of them.
comment in response to
post
And, Jonathan is sitting by Joe, the owner fella?
comment in response to
post
Did you see the latest post of JK sitting by the Lacobs at the WNBA game? Is that a direct or subtle message?
comment in response to
post
Remember, they had a winning record during the regular season without Steph. Yes, a healthy Minnesota team was too much, but the other guys really don't suck at the game. Add into the thought that 2-4 other players would fill the 3 H.O.F. guy's spots. That's a lot of salary coming off the books.
comment in response to
post
Did he not realize that Jimmy doesn't run the Steph-centric offense?
comment in response to
post
Who is that on Jonathan's other side?
comment in response to
post
...That's a terrific picture. Thanks for sharing.
comment in response to
post
Incorrect.
comment in response to
post
If they want a future identity, then they build that around JK, Moses, Podz, Gui, and Post. They're young and make the team intriguing and part of a winning team. Obviously, more parts will be needed...
comment in response to
post
It's difficult to trust a word from them concerning Jonathan after that season. Kerr's words never matched his coaching actions. Now, is Lacob just marketing and selling when he speaks about the kid? Or, can he see his team past Steph? That's what matters.