lockheeddarlin.bsky.social
haterade sommelier
149 posts
31 followers
275 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
greatest city is da world
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
YES! YES!!!!
comment in response to
post
can we get a “global intifada” version?
comment in response to
post
yo this goes hard as hell
comment in response to
post
yo this goes hard as hell
comment in response to
post
(Mark Whahlburg voice)
comment in response to
post
please primary Schumer sir, we are standing by to support you 🫡
comment in response to
post
Zhohran Mamdani, Marxist Jhihadi is this anything
comment in response to
post
credit to them they knew there’s an H in jihadi they just weren’t sure where
comment in response to
post
That’s my President 🫡
comment in response to
post
If they can bring with them knowledge of tobacco farming it’ll be good for trans-pacific trade. Selfishly it’ll also give LA a sovereign buffer from those barbarians and brutes in Northern California
comment in response to
post
I nominate the central coast of California
comment in response to
post
the death of Souplantation set us back years
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
Hello 50501 this is your lawer speaking. I am strongly advising you to please keep posting this shit
comment in response to
post
> Matt Yglesias follower
comment in response to
post
So where were you this weekend? bsky.app/profile/moll...
comment in response to
post
Eat my entire ass
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
Anyone watching TV has seen the kidnapping videos, if they’re still on the fence it’s only because they don’t want to admit they support it.
The job isn’t to win head on, it’s to slow them down make it too difficult costly and time consuming to do the job and get the most vulnerable to safety
comment in response to
post
Showing them how peaceful we are isn’t going to make them stop, it’s just going to make their job easier.
comment in response to
post
When will we be “there”? When the secret police are kidnapping people and renditioning them to offshore concentration camps? When they send in the military to quell dissent? All of that’s been on the news. Anyone who says they’re still undecided at this point just doesn’t want to say they support it
comment in response to
post
Liberals need to understand protesters are not there to be the grassroots arm of the Democratic Party. They’re out there driving back a violent, murderous invading army, not trying to look good on camera to help get your favorite guy elected.
comment in response to
post
Who gives a shit about “optics”? There isn’t anyone to be won over. People either know what’s happening is evil or they’re evil themselves and love this shit. This isn’t a marketing campaign, it’s survival.
comment in response to
post
the same thing happened with me and Colin Farrell. he had a bunch of crystals in his sweater pocket and I had a bag of Takis in my bag they wanted to inspect.
comment in response to
post
buddy have you ever met a troop
comment in response to
post
very much so, they love that shit
comment in response to
post
tell that coward Newsom to order the guard to stand down
comment in response to
post
tell that coward Newsom to order the guard to stand down or else shut the fuck up collaborator
comment in response to
post
Senator with all due respect, eat my entire ass
comment in response to
post
Does anybody know if we need to send in a new direct deposit form or will they just use the same info from last time?
comment in response to
post
This isn’t an optics game, there’s no one to “win over.” Protests aren’t the grassroots arm of the Democratic Party campaign apparatus. The goal isn’t to get your favorite politician elected, it’s to drive back a murderous, fascist invading army.
comment in response to
post
Liberals view protests as the grassroots arm of the Democratic Party and as such feel entitled to a say in strategy and optics
comment in response to
post
bulldozed government buildings, stormed Parliment, occupied government offices, and shut down roads and airports
comment in response to
post
The problem with using the color revolutions as a template is that the U.S. considers destruction of property or disruption of capital violence, and admonitions to keep protests “nonviolent” also means nondestructive and nondisruptive. The color revolutions may have been nonviolent but they
comment in response to
post
I don’t think the prosecutor made a compelling case, I’m not convinced, I still have doubts, whatever you want
comment in response to
post
the crew hanging out in the San Bernardino mountains
comment in response to
post
Name one thing that’s ever been won through “peaceful protests”
comment in response to
post
1. There’s no prize at the end for being the best rules follower
2. They’re going to claim the protests were violent either way
3. There is nothing to be won by asking nicely
comment in response to
post
then maybe do something about it you feckless coward collaborator
comment in response to
post
he dated the other one
comment in response to
post
lmao I had no idea I just think of that post every time a club in a college town is mentioned
comment in response to
post
Closed.
Most popular nightclub in Cleveland State University college town.
comment in response to
post
The only red flag/green flag thing I ever really look out for is if someone is kind to kids, animals and service workers. That’s like 90% of the ball game
comment in response to
post
Nathan Fielder? The Ecuadorian military pilot?
comment in response to
post
needs more digits of pie to close in on the answer