Profile avatar
mackensiesworld.bsky.social
Analyst and avid researcher.
183 posts 11 followers 3 following
Discussion Master
comment in response to post
Takes my breath away too
comment in response to post
Takes my breath away
comment in response to post
Blah Blah Blah Boilerplate propaganda. πŸ’€πŸ’€πŸ’€πŸ’€πŸ’€
comment in response to post
Yup, she applied for the wrong visa. Work for food and accommodation? Is WORK, not tourism Maybe she won't lie on her visa application next time, eh? πŸ™‚
comment in response to post
Wer finanziert β€žKlimaskeptikerβ€œ-Tweets? πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ China πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Weise, Klug 🌎 World 🌎 DΓ€mlich, Idioten
comment in response to post
There's a reason no one believes climate scientists anymore - you believe your deliberately programmed results of gloom and doom are better and more accurate than anyone else's deliberately programmed results of doom and gloom. How about predict the weather Β±0.5Β°C one week in advance!
comment in response to post
She didn't validate the experiment by reversing the gases, switching thermometers, multiple tests etc Did she calibrate the thermometers and to what standard? What abnormalities were in the glass containers: weight, thicker / thinner glass? It was a faux experiment! #ClimateScam πŸ˜…
comment in response to post
The problem is that - YOU understand the quote but you're triggered. πŸ˜…
comment in response to post
Yup, the containers were pressurized when the gases were sealed inside, but no one knows the pressure!!! Foote was too stupid to understand the pressure - temperature relationship πŸ˜…
comment in response to post
You're extremely delusional. πŸ™‚
comment in response to post
You're the pathetic one πŸ™‚
comment in response to post
I gave you their explanation - word for word. I get it, climatards like you have to pretend to be dumb when y'all can't refute the science that refutes your cultish beliefs. πŸ™‚
comment in response to post
The hypothesis was falsified by NASA Climate decades ago. NOAA Climate also falsified the hypothesis several years later. You're in a cult of denial. πŸ™‚
comment in response to post
Pressure inside sealed glass containers will change with heating/cooling What pressure changes did she observe? If you don't know, just say that you have no idea. πŸ™‚
comment in response to post
NASAClimate "the major difficulty in accepting the theory has been the absence of observed warming coincident with the historic COβ‚‚ increase" "The time history of the warming obviously does not follow the course of the COβ‚‚ increase, indicating that other factors must affect global mean temperature"
comment in response to post
*same pressure* Please detail the internal pressure of each container in each phase of her faux experiment Starting pressures and variance in pressures throughout each phase in each container - up to the conclusion of each phase Date and exact time of day for each phase would be most helpful πŸ™‚
comment in response to post
We have no idea, it was so far from a tightly controlled experiment, it's laughable. Nice try, but I guess that's all you got Fail FAIL Fail
comment in response to post
Then it should be easy to warm up the surface (1 mΒ²) in the Arctic at -40Β°C, at night, with just adding a bit (or a lot) of COβ‚‚ I wanna see THAT! πŸ™‚
comment in response to post
Is the hypothesis of anthropogenic global warming based on glass containers? Y/N Is the hypothesis of anthropogenic global warming based on direct Sunlight? Y/N Is the hypothesisof anthropogenic global warming based on glass containers placed in direct Sunlight? Y/N πŸ™‚
comment in response to post
Yes, of course she did, she tested the warmth of sunlight vs shade in a ridiculously faux experiment that had nothing to do with anthropogenic global anything. Last I checked, there's no glass containers in the sky filled with COβ‚‚ If you have contrary evidence, then post the pics. πŸ˜…
comment in response to post
So you deny COβ‚‚ warms the arctic more than elsewhere and warms nights more than days? Okie doke, you're the science denier. #ClimateScam
comment in response to post
Since we agree that the glass traps heat in both, remove the glass to demonstrate this amazing heat from just COβ‚‚ You can't It's a #ClimateScam
comment in response to post
In Shade : In Sun <The End>
comment in response to post
The glass trapped ALL the heat in her faux experiment, the only thermometers were INSIDE the glass container. You're a DufusΒ³ πŸ˜…
comment in response to post
Then control the composition with the glass - AT NIGHT Be careful, the glass might catch on fire.... πŸ™‚
comment in response to post
If the glass is irrelevant to your *proof*, then remove the glass from the experiment and please demonstrate the warming from COβ‚‚. πŸ™‚
comment in response to post
There were ZERO controls: Time of day Solar irradiance Duration Atmospheric conditions Pressure in containers Moisture level in containers Air temperature away from containers but in same In Shade vs In Sun Surface temperature away from containers but in same In Shade vs In Sun Grade 7 "F"
comment in response to post
The glass container trapped ALL the heat 100% of the HEAT No glass, no trapped heat Prove otherwise. πŸ™‚
comment in response to post
No Glass Container = No πŸ₯΅ ICYMI, the glass container is the 'sleight of science' trick of the trade. Your cult relies on deception, illusion, delusion. πŸ™‚
comment in response to post
The glass container trapped ALL the heat. Remove the glass container ~ No Heat Trapped πŸ™‚
comment in response to post
COβ‚‚ + LWIR = ⭕️ COβ‚‚ + Glass Container + Sun = πŸ₯΅ COβ‚‚ + No glass container = ⭕️ COβ‚‚ + No Sun = ⭕️ COβ‚‚ + No Sun + No glass container = ⭕️ The "heat" is derived from the Sun + glass container. COβ‚‚ is innocent. You're welcome. #ClimateScamCult
comment in response to post
Show me that COβ‚‚ "traps heat" outside, in the Arctic night. In 2013,MetOffice stated that the Arctic is warming 8 TIMES faster than the rest of the world. Let's see COβ‚‚ + LWIR (at -40Β°C) = Warming How much? How fast? I'll wait.... πŸ™‚
comment in response to post
If COβ‚‚ traps heat, COβ‚‚ in a glass container should be warmer than a glass container with ambient air - both placed outside on a cold arctic night. Let's see this magical warming of COβ‚‚. πŸ™‚
comment in response to post
COβ‚‚ has no warming effect A glass container filled with COβ‚‚ will not trap heat at night, especially in the Arctic winter nights. It's a hoax based on deception, illusions and delusions. πŸ™‚
comment in response to post
This is pathetic. The glass container trapped heat. Full Stop.
comment in response to post
I'm glad you agree, the glass container placed in direct Sun - trapped the heat. No glass container, no Sun, no trapping of heat. Why not use the glass container with various gases at night? Just LWIR & the gases? Because it's a HOAX! πŸ™‚
comment in response to post
I wouldn't call Maurice Strong a scientist, but he started the UN on the pathway to promote the climate crisis hoax. πŸ™‚
comment in response to post
Foote showed that glass containers placed in direct Sun trapped heat. If COβ‚‚ trapped heat, she wouldn't need the glass container or the Sun. πŸ˜…
comment in response to post
Yeah, I read her "In SHADE" vs "In Sun" and laughed at her uncontrolled experiment. Not one parameter (ambient, concentratio, pressure, humidity was measured other than sketchy thermometers.
comment in response to post
Here's one hoaxer. πŸ™‚
comment in response to post
In order for the solitary, added "anthropogenic" COβ‚‚ to warm the surrounding 9,999 other molecules by 1Β°C That COβ‚‚ molecule needs to be hotter than the Sun. AGW is a hoax, a scam, and a fraud. #ClimateScamCult
comment in response to post
Foote would get an F in science class. No parameters shown: timing of experiment, ambient temperature, humidity levels, pressure in container, solar irradiance in w/mΒ², time of day Her In SHADE vs In Sun is laughable, only a moron would think it's AGW in a bottle. πŸ˜…
comment in response to post
The heat from the Sun was trapped in a sealed glass container the was placed in direct sunlight. Open the container, no more heat trapped. How to prove anthropogenic global warming - Place a COβ‚‚ filled glass container & set it out on a -40Β°C night Instant heat, right? πŸ˜… #ClimateScamCult
comment in response to post
*CO2 retains the sun's heat more than ordinary air* Sun's heat isn't trapped in COβ‚‚ in the atmosphere, if is was, COβ‚‚ could be measured to be warmer than the other gases in the atmosphere. Spoiler alert: COβ‚‚ is not warmer than the surrounding molecules - day or night. You're a moron.
comment in response to post
She merely showed that closed glass containers, retained heat when placed in direct sunlight - not exactly a shocking discovery bozo Open the containers - where does the heat go? Heat is trapped by the glass containers when placed in direct SUNLIGHT. OMG you're even dumber than I thought πŸ˜‚
comment in response to post
I have engaged many well known climate scientists in extended email dialogues on a variety of topics. I know a DEI puppet when I see one. πŸ™‚
comment in response to post
You're trying to convince me that the greenhouse hypothesis - is somehow proven by COβ‚‚ retaining heat - in a glass jar - that was placed in direct sunlight. That's hilarious πŸ˜‚
comment in response to post
If COβ‚‚ warms stuff, why did Foote need the Sun to prove the Sun is warmer than the shade? She coulda used just COβ‚‚ and made the ground - under a tree - warmer at night than the other trees in her yard. 🀭
comment in response to post
I'm very familiar with the DEI ret@rds. What year did you recently graduate from DEI kindergarten? πŸ™‚
comment in response to post
Your brain is the only thing that's sloppy. How long have you been a permanent resident in The Greta Thunberg Insane Asylum For Climatards? πŸ™‚