Profile avatar
madmcdan.bsky.social
I don't follow people without any posts or interactions. Please don't put me in a list. Not here to rack up followers. Here to scream in to the void, laugh and appreciate with like minded people. Areligious rather than atheist.
267 posts 1,090 followers 1,787 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
This is how I currently see the dream that was the USA...
comment in response to post
Silly thing, but I would like to thank everyone. I thought my comment was a flippant throwaway, and it's nice it inspired a respectful discussion. I have not seen such pleaseant back and forrh, even in disagreement online for a while. It's been pleasant to go through the comments.
comment in response to post
I believe that is a curse in China, "May you live in interesting times!"
comment in response to post
I suspect it depends on your leaning and income. Centre / left leaning and poor and you'll get it in both ends...
comment in response to post
The only constant in life is change.
comment in response to post
Change the submission. Get Cali to acknowledge payment. Cali collects and agrees to pass on conditionally. Many red states depend on this money, they should not argue with bigger more powerful states. They're no angels! (Not my opinion, rather a parody of something P01135809 said yesterday).
comment in response to post
You're not serious? Satire? Surely no man can want to promote ignorance?
comment in response to post
She was lying?!
comment in response to post
Once you accept they're hypocrits, you know you can't trust them. "What's good for me is not for thee!" Or something like that!
comment in response to post
Are they still eating the dogs and eating the cats, P01135809?
comment in response to post
The science is not yet... Yeah, cracking idea!
comment in response to post
I don't know, he claims he called there? (Which I believe is a crime, but let's not get hung up on a drop in the ocean). The 2 parties may have been prompted to rush through an agreement. Well would you want to be in a closed environment with a man who couldn't control his bowels in court?
comment in response to post
You really want to watch him squirm? Ask him which kid belongs with which mother!
comment in response to post
I would love to say that healthcare is a benevolent act by the rest of the world, but studies have shown it actually BENEFITS the economy overall. The issue for the GOP is that they can't tap the whole economy for money, but they can health insurers I assume?
comment in response to post
What?! Am in the UK so I don't watch Fox News (we have something else I will not name). At least one of those 2 is an idiot!
comment in response to post
Looking to claim all profits from trading after that + punitive damages! Couldn't happen to a nicer nazi!
comment in response to post
Perhaps a god got pissy with him taking his name in vain?
comment in response to post
You mean it was ANOTHER lie? Goodness me, colour me shocked!
comment in response to post
Is she accessorising with a burning cross?!?!
comment in response to post
They appear to have all the grace and dignity of a diarrhetic fart in a crowded elevator... At some point surepy they've had to ask themselves, "Are we being c*nts?" But decided to keep going!
comment in response to post
A slight correction but one well worth making!
comment in response to post
P01135809 says complete exoneration, we all know he means "I got away with it!"
comment in response to post
So really it's 34 time convicted + 1 he really should have been?
comment in response to post
I just.... Well clearly he's saying... Well if you consider... What!?!?!? Just no, how in the name of all that is holy did this cockwomble get back in!?!?!?
comment in response to post
Self-serving, scum sucking splitters! I do hope names are talen so when asked at the next election "What did you do whilst LA burned?" there is this evidence that they were brown nosing an adjudicated rapist!
comment in response to post
Lobotomised at birth? Clearly elementary school was too much for her!
comment in response to post
Not sure what that means? Are they punches coming at me? Fist bumps? I'll assume they're positive based on your profile!
comment in response to post
Quid pro quo, California tax contributions should also be halted. What's the phrase? "No taxation without representation?" (Yes I am English, but partially American educated, and well, but that was paid for!)
comment in response to post
Whether they wanted to or not!
comment in response to post
If a constitution can prevent help for the people, by the people, surely it's flawed!?
comment in response to post
America's greatest loss?
comment in response to post
I believe the word you're looking for is TWAT!
comment in response to post
There was a quote that I had thought was becoming obsolete due to everything you are fighting against, but I think it is still valid for you. "I may disagree with what you say, but I will fight to the death for your right to say it!" (May be mis-quoted, it's broadly there!).
comment in response to post
Ah, muskrat. The accidental fact checker. (Anything he endorses is pretty much proven BS).
comment in response to post
So over twice the diamter of earth?