Profile avatar
mandymitchell.me
šŸ³ļøā€āš§ļøšŸ³ļøā€šŸŒˆSoftware engineer & raconteuse. Probably autistic? My dog thinks I write cool code. https://mandymusings.com/ for my tech blog
1,445 posts 2,406 followers 672 following
Getting Started
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
What a relief!
comment in response to post
I will not be the person who responds with a suggestion. I will not be the person who responds with a suggestion. I will not be the person who responds with a suggestion. That sounds rough! šŸ˜ž
comment in response to post
Are you able to share details about the magnitude of the budget needs?
comment in response to post
If you used a Windows computer prior to Windows 95, and if you used a modem to connect to the Internet, Trumpet is almost certainly what you used
comment in response to post
Or was it Trumpet WINsock? I cannot remember, and I feel like it would dishonor the memory of that era to effortlessly look it up
comment in response to post
In a couple of weeks, I’ll be starting my fourth post-university tech job (after ~21 years), and this was a timely reminder to trust my instincts as I go into it. Thanks!
comment in response to post
This!
comment in response to post
For what it’s worth, I think it’s pretty cool that someone would be wired that way.
comment in response to post
Excited for you!
comment in response to post
So something like ā€œreverse demisexualā€?
comment in response to post
When helping friends make hard decisions like which job offer / college admission to accept, I’ve sometimes had them flip a coin to get the result, then ask them about the feeling in the pit of their stomach when they ā€œdecideā€ that way. There might be something to this!
comment in response to post
Thanks for this recommendation! I particularly appreciated that you mentioned the proposed solutions in the book, as I’ve been looking for discussions that talk about *how* to move forward with genAI, rather than simply rejecting the options that are being pushed.
comment in response to post
DMs are open if you want to chat more privately about any of this
comment in response to post
Also, just in case it’s ambiguous: I don’t mean that it’s a lot to *share*: I’m glad you did! What I mean is that I can feel the weight of it across the Internet, and I can only imagine how oppressive it must be to experience it firsthand.
comment in response to post
Wow. That’s a lot to sit with. šŸ˜ž I know that we haven’t interacted a *ton* on here, so my voice may not have much wait, but I can tell that you’re a really special, thoughtful person, and you *deserve* to have that self discovery because it is *so* powerful.
comment in response to post
I guess for you, the ā€œaā€ in agender could stand for ā€œapatheticā€? šŸ¤·šŸ¼ā€ā™€ļø
comment in response to post
I have a week of funemployment coming up soon, and I may try to write my own take on this that’s grounded in a wider variety of engineering activities.
comment in response to post
I’m hopeful šŸ¤žšŸ¼ that there’s a new wave of AI tools around the corner that focus on helping humans be more reflective, thoughtful people, rather than doing work for them. And this provides some possible direction to how engineers can continue to find joy and growth post AI.
comment in response to post
I’ve been hearing this from a lot of folks, and it’s a big concern for me, too; thanks for sharing! Have you come across @hazelweakly.me’s excellent hazelweakly.me/blog/stop-bu...? Her examples are motivated by incident response but would easily apply to coding assistants.
comment in response to post
You know, it’s that implant that some people get in order to keep their heartbeat regular
comment in response to post
I wonder if the German language has invented a term to describe this phenomenon
comment in response to post
I mean, I probably *have* more, but that’s the first. Go Go Curry is pretty great Definitely try Abura Ramen … Oh wait, did you want recommendations other than food? šŸ˜…
comment in response to post
Thanks!
comment in response to post
Not sure if complimentary or… šŸ˜…
comment in response to post
Then I won’t repeat the recommendation! šŸ˜‚
comment in response to post
I can understand where you’re coming from, and I suspect that we’re coming from sufficiently different places that it would be difficult to gain much understanding from each other in this medium Thanks for engaging respectfully!
comment in response to post
I’m also not saying that you *do* believe this, but it seems to be the implication of your question. I’m happy to entertain clarifications!
comment in response to post
Any economic system will have self absorbed assholes, and they will often be very powerful.
comment in response to post
Note that I said, ā€œinsofar as it has oneā€. If you believe that there is no one engaged in capitalism that is trying to engage it with a thoughtful utilitarian approach, then we won’t have much to say to each other.
comment in response to post
I don’t quite know what I mean by this or if I quite believe it yet. It’s a loosely held hand wave towards a hypothesis
comment in response to post
Here’s my walk/shower thought: A big reason folks with deeply held views on the ethics of genAI use aren’t getting traction in industry is they are unable/unwilling to translate their thoughts into utilitarianism, which is the native ethical framework of capitalism, insofar as it has one
comment in response to post
Have you been to Japan before?
comment in response to post
The pacing is such that I haven’t been able to finish a full viewing in over a decade, but Nadesico has *so* much heart. Based on your online persona, I think you’d really love it
comment in response to post
I also think that the current AI tools have been built to appeal to folks who don’t necessarily want to think hard because those groups—and those markets—have historically been much larger. Which makes sense from a product perspective.
comment in response to post
I’m sure that there will still be jobs for both groups, but many folks will find that they’re not currently at the right *kind* of job for the future, resulting in displacement. And I think we’ll also eventually find tools appealing to Philosophers. We’re just in a ā€œchasm of suckā€ right now.
comment in response to post
Philosopher engineers find the current generation of tools repellent because they offer no way to understand the world better. While Pragmatic engineers are just happy to find their jobs made easier. This often results in the Philosophers feeling betrayed by the Pragmatists
comment in response to post
My hypothesis is that the nature of software engineering has tended to make the first two groups associate more than they have in the past without needing to care about the distinction. Gen AI is more starkly revealing who’s in each group, and it’s uncomfortable.
comment in response to post
I’ve been thinking about this, too, particularly from the perspective that in any generation, there are - folks who want to think hard (philosophers, &c) - folks *willing* to think hard for socioeconomic gain - folks who won’t think hard
comment in response to post
Torment Nexus, &c, &c
comment in response to post
I need to know more about these stellar bagels. Are they really made of stars?
comment in response to post
I think the ā€œshow badgeā€ option is specifically to show *you* the badges for others.
comment in response to post
Also: me when starting a new side project
comment in response to post
Oof