martinbishop.bsky.social
Systems Analyst, Writer, Stand-Down Comedian, Conflict Resolution Doulah, Peer Guru, Lifelong Un-Learner, Narrative Restoration Journeyman. Be the Jedi you want to see in the world.
120 posts
29 followers
16 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Thank you for the clip! It is always interesting to see people evolve, regardless of the direction, in my opinion. I liked his optimistic idea that altruism and libertarianism need not conflict even though I still disagree about vax benefits/harms.
comment in response to
post
Did Penn Jillette admit he was wrong?
comment in response to
post
You don't seem able to even imagine that someone like me could be so free from insecurities that your schoolyard taunts land as nothing more than a pathetic reflection of your larger-than-life inadequacies.
comment in response to
post
The Simpsons can be a springboard to a political career. Who knew??
comment in response to
post
Is that your go-to vintage? I recall you uncorked it 13 days ago too.
comment in response to
post
I'm sorry you feel so threatened by my superior intellect.
comment in response to
post
I'm reminded of nothing except your proclivity to lean into laughable attempts at personal insult when the facts aren't on your side.
comment in response to
post
In many of these graphs, "unvaccinated" includes people who had taken the vaccine less than two weeks before they died, so we don't really know how many of the dead were really unvaccinated. But I notice you're switching away from measles, finally conceding you lost that argument.
comment in response to
post
I understand completely. Everyone you disagree with is a lying clown. You can assume my algorithm will just compress out all ad hominem attacks in future and wait until you raise a substantive point to respond.
comment in response to
post
You're aware that your "argument" still rests on ad hominem fallacy-- attack the source instead of the information, right?
comment in response to
post
Ad Hominem attacks are logical fallacies, but I understand you have to go with what you've got if the facts aren't on your side.
comment in response to
post
Congrats, I knew you could transcend personal insults for a second and attempt to make a substantive post if you tried real hard.
Vaccines showing up afterwards to take all the credit:
comment in response to
post
But deaths due to measles dropped 95% BEFORE introduction of the vaccine.
x.com/i/grok/share...
comment in response to
post
You have my sympathy for having a job that requires you to believe shite whereas I am free to follow the truth wherever the evidence leads.
comment in response to
post
Matt, somehow I suspect you don't talk to people at work that way. There are many doctors, researchers, EMTs, ER room doctors and even Nobel prize winners who disagree with the CDC party line and for good reasons. Over four pages of very qualified people are listed in TRAF alone.
comment in response to
post
I listen to many more sources than you do.
I listen to the parents of vaccine-injured children.
I listen to Nobel laureates who dissent from v. orthodoxy.
I listen to researchers and doctors who aren't funded by the establishment.
99th percentile IQ, so no oxygen problem.
No mental issues.
comment in response to
post
I can present you with scientific evidence and already have here. I can't prevent you from deciding to ignore it if it disagrees with what you and the authorities you trust have determined a priori is unassailable truth.
comment in response to
post
lol, send me a million dollars and we'll test your hypothesis.
comment in response to
post
There are anecdotes both ways. You might check out my EMT friend's posts on X sometime.
comment in response to
post
I received a flu vaccine in 1998 and Guillan-Barre symptoms started about two weeks later. That was the last vaccine for me. I don't have my childhood vaccine records from pre-1986 era before manufacturer liability was waived.
comment in response to
post
Try reading "The Real Anthony Fauci" and learn about how corrupt business practices manipulate scientific literature.
comment in response to
post
You seem to really enjoy fantasizing about me playing quietly with myself a lot. This is the 4th or 5th time (you minx). Should I get an 800 number for you?
comment in response to
post
A huge body of well-funded bullshit.
comment in response to
post
To reject my contention you will believe whoever they tell you to believe is a crank instead of exercising critical thought and listening to your gut. I'm definitely going to enjoy these next few months a lot.
comment in response to
post
Fauci lied when he said the C19 shots were safe and effective. Who is "in" on the lies is not possible to say because there's no external evidence of internal state of mind or intent. Some at the pharma companies know and are "in" on it. Others are just in a state of cognitive dissonance.
comment in response to
post
Read Kennedy's books. Or Pierre Kory. Or just the Chapter with Tess Lawrie in The Real Anthony Fauci. Or even just Senior CDC Scientist William W. Thompson's account of CDC meeting to destroy evidence of increased autism in african american boys from early MMR shots (before age 3).
comment in response to
post
You might be intentionally obtuse, but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. We are talking about children and young adults having more chronic disease than previous generations at their ages.
comment in response to
post
Most just believe the lies for free like you.
comment in response to
post
Because he told the truth and got beat up for it by an abusive system that continues to abuse truth-tellers and autistic kids today. If your conclusions were actually beyond doubt you wouldn't have to come hide on bluesky, but would defend your views on a real platform.
comment in response to
post
In that case, I'm all ears. Tell me your best analysis. And try to say something that distinguishes you from the monoculture of "thought" here on Blue Sky.
comment in response to
post
The fact remains that chronic diseases are epidemic and growing rapidly and all official sources claim not to know why. All that is necessary for the forces of evil to prevail in the world is for enough good people to completely "trust the experts". Only a few need to be bribed/coerced.
comment in response to
post
Your previous assumption that 16 million scientists would have to be bribed is absurd and reason enough not to entertain further "analysis" from you, but go ahead, make your best argument... or don't. I'm okay with you continuing to wallow in freshman psychology (for which y'all have no credentials)
comment in response to
post
Your analyses would be based on biased and uninformed assumptions. The Milgram Experiment should be informative. It takes far less energy to maintain an abusive and corrupt system than most of us imagine.
comment in response to
post
Experts who dissent from vax orthodoxy include Nobel prize winners, doctors, PhDs, medical researchers. Yes, I think critically for myself, but I wouldn't say I do my own research. These are the people who do the research. "The science" is not settled. Far from it. There is legitimate dissent.
comment in response to
post
Sources are laid out in "Vax v Unvax" by Brian Hooker and RFK Jr.
comment in response to
post
Milgram experiment. Look it up.
comment in response to
post
I think I'm going to enjoy these next few months as the depth of corruption in big pharma is exposed to sunshine.
comment in response to
post
Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth. There are few carrots and many sticks in this system. Your estimates of costs will therefore be overestimates.
comment in response to
post
I know the difference. My mind has been persuaded and yours is closed, obviously.
comment in response to
post
Worthless study, "specific alternative therapies used were not recorded in the database"
comment in response to
post
I observe that your guarantee indicates you have a closed mind on this topic.
comment in response to
post
Your faith is unwarranted, but pure of heart.
comment in response to
post
If you love your cancer patients, there are unconventional treatments that are more effective than the conventional burn, cut and poison. Are you willing to be open to new information to save their lives?
comment in response to
post
Same to you.
comment in response to
post
Yes, I've written and published papers in my field and have been called upon to do peer-reviews of other scientists' submitted papers as well. Mawson is shinola, but you wouldn't know it.
comment in response to
post
That presumption doesn't explain the observed behaviors.