Profile avatar
matth23.bsky.social
I'm the literal definition of "turning caffeine into code" 🌐 https://www.webdevops.uk
611 posts 184 followers 625 following
Getting Started
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
Fascism is staring you in the face, and you're arguing civics. No offence intended, just a mildly amusing irony.
comment in response to post
HTML3.2 all the way. Can you say <marquee>?
comment in response to post
Who wrote this column? What is the name of this genocide supporting fascist?
comment in response to post
AI: A "solution" looking for a problem to solve, but browsers ain't it.
comment in response to post
Was she asleep for Brexit?
comment in response to post
Sorry ... but who is he?
comment in response to post
Will it, though? Will it, really? NARRATOR: Nope.
comment in response to post
So, let's stop selling a fascist state the tools to continue their illegal genocide and indiscriminate slaughter of innocent babies and children.
comment in response to post
You had a choice on how to frame this. You decided to support the fascists.
comment in response to post
While we keep supplying a fascist state with armaments, this is purely performative.
comment in response to post
Let's just hope they also still have functioning guardrails against the use of bombs ... those or otherwise.
comment in response to post
Huge news, if true.
comment in response to post
You need to sort out the violent thugs in your own ranks. bsky.app/profile/mens...
comment in response to post
This annoys me. If it's *known* that there's 400,000 homes in the wrong council tax band, why is it not the responsibility of those councils to proactively correct their mistakes?
comment in response to post
Your diligence in the respect for communication with your audience just gained you a follow.
comment in response to post
The day ends in a "y" so it's time for a reminder that Israel is a fascist state.
comment in response to post
The best response to a Nazi promoting genocide and the indiscriminate slaughter of innocent babies and children is the block button.
comment in response to post
I made my assessment of you being fascist Nazi scum based on your comments. Your reply suggests you have the intellectual capacity of a 9 year old. Grow the fuck up.
comment in response to post
You sound like fascist Nazi scum to me.
comment in response to post
Are you sure that wasn't the SanFranPhil rendition of 4′33″? That's a classice, that one, but easily mistaken for a blank tape.
comment in response to post
Keep reposting your lies into the void, fascist.
comment in response to post
Does your brain hurt with the mental loops you have to perform to justify the wholesale slaughter of babies and children? Do you rejoice each time you see the fascist Israeli state murder another innocent child?
comment in response to post
Why do I continue to pay my BBC licence fee tax while your "news" output is little short of continuous far right propaganda? Why do I continue to pay my BBC licence fee tax while #ToryLauraK is still employed? How do we know you're even a legit BBC account?
comment in response to post
I see the MAGA fascists from Twitter are making an appearance.
comment in response to post
And yet you support the fascist state of Israel?
comment in response to post
Caveat naked emperor!
comment in response to post
That's one of those charts that reminds me *exactly* what I was doing around that time. Memories!
comment in response to post
Have you guys heard of what's been going on in Eastern Europe lately ... ? I think you need to update yourselves on reality and perhaps reconsider this article?
comment in response to post
Is this situation not *exactly* what the #2A was created for?
comment in response to post
Ryan Air
comment in response to post
To ward off an obvious objection: Yes, the government already had all that data. But now it's in the hands of a far right white supremacist eugenicist. A fascist, if you will. We're already into the object-lesson phase.
comment in response to post
Let's see how this one plays out in realtime with DOGE's ransacking of government databases. Let's see what Trump and his Stazi do with that treasure trove of linked data. Let's see how long it takes until it's breached. I suspect it will be an object-lesson on the dangers.
comment in response to post
Indeed. But what are you collectively going to do about it other than words on social media?
comment in response to post
I'd forgotten all about that until literally just now.
comment in response to post
I had the dubious pleasure of an exercise at RAF Barnham (after the nukes had gone elsewhere) - it was my first experience of seeing in-person nature seriously retake our built environment, and not unlike Pripyat in the trees and bushes sprouting wherever they got the chance.
comment in response to post
This "clear evidence" is anecdotal and even if it exists is irrelevant to our experience in the UK, just as our experience is irrelevant elsewhere. This is your opportunity right here and now to move on in life and annoy somebody else.
comment in response to post
I say nothing to them: Their identity policies and politics are theirs to manage.
comment in response to post
I say this as someone who works in IT and understands the value - and danger - of a unique primary key.
comment in response to post
The inclusion of biometrics etc in a passport is after the fact of proving your identity to have one issued. There's no fundamental reason or justification for applying any other digital identifier.
comment in response to post
My point was the existence of the processes used to prove your own identify for the purposes of issuing a driving licence / passport could be extended to provide a non-digital "universal" ID in the absence of either, with all three carrying equal weight.
comment in response to post
It's called a passport, or a driving licence. The systems and processes are already in place for you to prove your own identity to be issued an identity document. We do not need another, with its horrific scope creep into "digital".
comment in response to post
Is the burden of proof not on the accuser in this regard?