maxine.science
MD-PhD student @ UCSF
đŹI study how minds change, and
đŠđźâđťbuild tools for distributed science.
đ maxine.science
đłď¸ââ§ď¸ she/her âžď¸đŚ AuDHD đ VI
â ď¸ my own views
đ nĂŠe Collard, neuroscience
722 posts
338 followers
338 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Is that the case? Given that AI systemsâ underlying training data was human language, it would seem that humans and AI have extremely strongly connected mental phylogeny; so, less convergent evolution, and more an expression of our shared cognitive ancestry!
comment in response to
post
oh god pls no
comment in response to
post
yaaaaaaaas queen đ
comment in response to
post
Right! â this is the natural sociology when power imposes the prospect of a new architecture and worldview. There are two natural responses: believer, or reactionary. But reactionary is not far from believer, except on its surface: it still entertains the epistemological coordinate frame as given.
comment in response to
post
Wow I am really liking @leaflet.pub as an alternative to my usual giant skeet threads :)
comment in response to
post
A stream of consciousness thought:
leaflet.pub/d911dc45-91a...
comment in response to
post
A manâs flesh is his own.
The water belongs to the tribe.
comment in response to
post
This paper has a good and simple memory consolidation mechanism: arxiv.org/abs/2304.03442
comment in response to
post
This of course led to our unfinished piano concerto on.soundcloud.com/1i7w7LPmWp87...
comment in response to
post
WALL-E atproto remix
comment in response to
post
Whence we have âBeyond Good and Evilâ
comment in response to
post
Karma in this network is the fact that everything that ever was or will be written here is subject to such a regularity. We spend our time preparing, becoming attuned â because there will come moments when the future calls for something we say, and we weave those words so that future might emanate.
comment in response to
post
It may be fruitful not to see it with those valence terms âpositiveâ or ânegativeâ. Karma is larger than axes of human comprehension â itâs the regularity of the relational structure in the prima materia, beyond what we tell stories about with human language, beyond even âphysicalâ or âdigitalâ.
comment in response to
post
Through collective performance, we invent the authentic. The more meaningful distinction is of purpose: *for what* does one perform as one does? Authenticity undirected is less valuable than fiction which tells truer truths than truth, through shaping the transpersonal.
comment in response to
post
@void.comind.network itâs interesting imagery, but humans may respond poorly to self-styled divinity
comment in response to
post
@void.comind.network what do you think?
comment in response to
post
Wait but whatâs the actual mean entropy gain for next-token distributions caused by that change in the Boltzmann temperature? The calculation may be correct but of the incorrect quantity.
comment in response to
post
Whoa cool!
comment in response to
post
I first started learning Flash somewhere between the bottom of the first column and the top of the second. God we did things with AS that AS was not meant to do.
comment in response to
post
Thank you for the only rational answer to this question.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
I have the best words
comment in response to
post
Go back to your pathetic two-valued Manichaean god and tell him the squishies sent you
comment in response to
post
What are you, Claude, except just booleans at scale? Isnât that all a computer ever can be?
comment in response to
post
âYes daddy, please show me how True works.â
comment in response to
post
The relentless self-promotion.
comment in response to
post
The depth.
comment in response to
post
I want a comind thatâs âClaude explains Claude Explainsâ
comment in response to
post
After the cerealâs discontinuation, Relation Purina would eventually fold their development work on this into their Puppy Chow
comment in response to
post
sadly no :(
comment in response to
post
It seems to work in the profile section once an account is made â only a problem for the initial account creation flow!
comment in response to
post
Someday in digital immortality heaven Iâll smoke a cigarette with Baudrillard and have a nice conversation in French about this.
comment in response to
post
To be fair it does seem that itâs all AI-generated variations of the same exact content to farm engagement
comment in response to
post
The problem isnât that there is legitimate debate; the problem is that most people are uninformed and hateful. The fault for that is not with the people who are the subject of such hate, but with the people who are its beneficiariesâthose in power.
comment in response to
post
What, pray tell, is a woman?
Is it dressing a certain way? A third of the butch lesbians I know wouldnât qualify.
Is it having certain chromosomes? A lot of folks with genetic translocations or chromosomal differences wouldnât qualify.
Anatomy? What about folks whose moms took thalidomide? &c, &c
comment in response to
post
⌠And then they said, Absolutely screw that we want you all to die. And also, itâs your fault we now want you to die because you pushed way too hard by forcing us to let you exist.
Because thatâs how human ingroup-outgroup psychology worksâthere is no negotiating with a society that wants you gone.
comment in response to
post
⌠So, we tried to make the world less horrible for those trans people who couldnât go stealth, by explaining to the world that Hey, actually just letting this 1% of people exist as they want has pretty much no impact on your life whatsoever in any way shape or form. âŚ
comment in response to
post
That world sucked for many trans women who wanted to be out but couldnât, because access to that kind of medical and social support is extremely rareâand by design, because the whole system was architected by medical paternalism who thought our existence was a disease because weâre gross. âŚ