Profile avatar
mbkugler.bsky.social
Law professor, Northwestern University. Doing privacy and intellectual property. Views are my own. https://www.law.northwestern.edu/faculty/profiles/matthewkugler/ Free privacy casebook https://www.privacycasebook.com/
182 posts 631 followers 597 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
True. Need more theater majors.
comment in response to post
Look, this might count as a foul. I believe the appropriate restart is an indirect free kick.
comment in response to post
Ah yes. The “only extremists are sincere” argument.
comment in response to post
Not my area, but I’m intrigued. I agree with your intuition.
comment in response to post
The dream of all customer service representative
comment in response to post
Did you date a tornado or a dust storm?
comment in response to post
It might be okay. bsky.app/profile/chri...
comment in response to post
Plainly the last few months of info security scandals are an elaborate plot to convince us that they’re too dumb to carry out a covert op. Alternatively: the way we know it wasn’t staged is that we haven’t gotten the group chat yet.
comment in response to post
Your students did not notice anything odd about this, however, and you are about to receive a stack of beautifully written exams on the investigatory steps taken by raccoons.
comment in response to post
This is why child labor is so awesome. Small hands for hard to reach places ;) Enjoying the saga. Good luck!
comment in response to post
I pity anyone trying to square the various bits of antisemitism related education law from this year.
comment in response to post
I’d tell them that cats won’t be on the exam, but they will. :)
comment in response to post
I so loved that story. Probably my favorite, and there are some other good ones!
comment in response to post
My first thought was to check you’d read Mira Grant. :P. Did you also read the prequel novella?
comment in response to post
Basically astroturfing opeds. talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/94551
comment in response to post
All of the above, at once, on too much caffeine.
comment in response to post
That he didn’t reward Columbia may be his biggest tactical mistake. There just doesn’t seem to be any advantage to anything short of complete capitulation.
comment in response to post
Given the clarity of Carpenter, maybe it is for the best that they haven't taken another case since. :)
comment in response to post
It's funny. When Riley came down I really thought that the warrantless border searches would promptly stop as well - like a dozen other people I did a note on electronic devices at the border. But we still have this issue so many years later.
comment in response to post
Wait, we weren’t supposed to capitalize White? This lack of attention to rules is why I made a bad law review editor.
comment in response to post
You might be surprised how often CVs either aren’t available or aren’t updated.
comment in response to post
I think this is a case of programming experience not equaling data science experience. No competent social scientist would make this mistake, and only a dishonest one would keep making it.
comment in response to post
And northwestern! Should we expect more ivy in our future?
comment in response to post
On the good old days we had a “send this rejection tomorrow” button.
comment in response to post
Anesthesia is now mandatory during Black History Month, which also does not exist.
comment in response to post
“Christmas Shoes” may warrant threats of unlawful imprisonment.
comment in response to post
I’m surprised by the student coauthor. This seems like exactly the kind of thing we shouldn’t coauthor with an early career person.
comment in response to post
Hey, we are also notably missing! Don’t erase us. :P
comment in response to post
Star Wars never warned me that the empire would be this dumb. Like, the rebels needed to blow up the Death Star. These guys would crash it into a star and blame DEI for putting the star there.
comment in response to post
90% this. I can’t imagine that Columbia is fully blind to the chilling effects, but it’s likely under the mistaken belief that there won’t be significant secondary effects.
comment in response to post
That is an entirely rational response to current events. I finished in 2010, when universities were belt-tightening due to recession. That was bad. This is worse.