mi2radical4u.bsky.social
58 posts
6 followers
1 following
Discussion Master
comment in response to
post
No x-ray vision. It came with groups dime size at 50'. I'm older now, so groups at that range are now quarter size. Mag capacity is no different than pickup trucks. A F350 can haul 8000 lb, but you can use it for 500lb loads. Same with guns. One invader, 2-3rounds. 5 invaders, full mag.
comment in response to
post
You do realize even in open carry / stend your ground states you will have to justify your actions if you shoot someone. The defense of "they dress & act like gangsters" will most likely make you your cell mate's wife.
comment in response to
post
And the Secret Service Also has rooftop snipers, but that's beside the point. I had my Junior NRA sharpshooter cert at 16. I ain't hitting the baby. I do have a gun safe(s) but not all are locked in them. No kids in my home, but 2 of 3 here have CCDW permit. My locks are for your safety.
comment in response to
post
If you think about it, unless you live in one of the four or five looney left states, you are probably within arms reach of someone with a gun a dozen or more times a day. And yet you are still alive.
comment in response to
post
I have several Hi-Point firearms. Yes, they are heavy & ugly, but never had a FTF with them. If I'm going somewhere where carry is restricted, I take one of them to leave in the car. If it gets stolen I'll cry a lot less than if it was one of my S&W's, Glocks, or Ruger.
comment in response to
post
AI said that in 1995 the UK had about the same annual number as now, so it seams the UK assualt weapon ban only changed the method of murder, but did nothing to decrease murder.
comment in response to
post
The limits of the 2nd have already been ruled on.
DC v Heller
New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn. v Bruen.
comment in response to
post
"A well regulated militia being necessary", not required.
P.S. By law, all men over 17 and under 46 are by law part of the reserve militia.
comment in response to
post
LA police don't cooperate with ICE, why should ICE cooperate with LA?
comment in response to
post
I liked this one better.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
Mythbusters did the "gun in a hot car" expirement in an episode some years back. Cars don't get hot enough to set ammo off.
comment in response to
post
I don't think there is a winner, just expressing my opinions, & am curious of yours. In your opinion, what does the 2nd Amendment mean. Is it for all regardless of military service? Is it meant to only apply to muskets or guns in service at its writing? Does it cover adults 18 years old?
comment in response to
post
Point is, the 2nd is one sentence. Many read it to mean the right of all people. Many others read it to mean a right for active militia. You cannot disagree that people are divided on the meaning. Federalist #46 simply shows that it was intended to mean all citizens.
comment in response to
post
Can you read? I never said they were the 2nd. I said they show the thought process behind the Bill of Rights. The pros & cons behind weighing what restrictions they thought government needed. They are not the worthless scribbling you seen to think they are.
comment in response to
post
Federalist Papers do explain the thought process behind writing the Bill of Rights. They lay to rest the false notion anti-gun people try to push that the right to keep & bear arms was meant only for active militia members.
comment in response to
post
Yes. They predate the Bill of Rights. They also explain the reasons the Bill of Rights was added to the Constuition. The Constuition set up a form of government. The Bill of Rights set limits of government overreach. And YES, they do mention the need of armed citizens.
comment in response to
post
Your reply missed the point of my original post.
comment in response to
post
I didn't say caliber, I said capacity.
comment in response to
post
I deserve the right to protect myself and my family with the same magazine capacity as someone protecting a member of the president's family. They are not part of the government, so they are not more important.
comment in response to
post
I stand corrected.
comment in response to
post
I checked 3 national news & 3 local news sites. Found NO articles on anyone impersonating ICE agents to commit crimes. This sounds like fake news.
comment in response to
post
ICE does not need a warrant to detain or arrest persons illegally in the country out on the street, or public property. Just because a congressman screams "show me your warrant" doesn't mean they need one.
comment in response to
post
I thought the left was inclusive.
comment in response to
post
How does he know what that dumbass is doing crouched behind his car? I don't blame for coming out gun drawn.
comment in response to
post
If a bunch of masked men are performing a legal arrest, (yes, ICE arrests are legal weather you like it or not) your granny is going to prison.
comment in response to
post
You will lose that argument. The "I didn't know" defense rarely works. Choose your own path.
comment in response to
post
I do have a CCDW license. If you use deadly force, you will have to justify it. ICE wears approved clothing, enforcing laws on the books. A defense of "I didn't know they were LEO" or "I don't like how they are doing it" will land you in prison for a long time.
comment in response to
post
Looks like you stuck your junk in the peanut butter for the dog to lick off.
comment in response to
post
The 2nd Amendment is not about hunting or sport shooting. Read "The Federalist Papers" and you will understand.
comment in response to
post
I see a lot of big talk on this issue, but I believe it's going nowhere. You know they can shoot back, & if you live, will be charged with attempted murder of a federal agent. You will spend the best part of your life in prison being your cell mate's wife. A lot to gamble for an illegal immigrant.
comment in response to
post
Fine. The kids are citizens, but if their parents are here illegally we can and should deport them. They can take the kid with them, or assign a guardian as is their right. If they take the kid with them, after he/she turns 18 they are welcome to return.
comment in response to
post
2nd states "A well regulated militia being necessary", not "required".
Plus, by law, all able bodied men over 18 and under 46 are members of the Reserve Militia.
comment in response to
post
Following your thought, then the 1st Amendment only covers spoken word face to face, pen to paper, & physical newspaper. No phone, no internet, & no radio or TV.
comment in response to
post
Oh, ouch. FK Canada, at least until it's our 51st state.
comment in response to
post
There are no innocents who's stated goal is death to all Jews. Nor would you be willing to discuss the countless suicide bombers who blew up many marketplaces over the years.
comment in response to
post
Not overweight, good health. Enjoying life with liberal endorsed benefits. $90K pension/SS, no Healthcare payments, & retired before my 55th birthday. As of now, I have received over 1.5 million in state/federal benefits since I retired, all through democrat policies. You should be happy for me.
comment in response to
post
I have no desire to shoot myself. I'm happy with my life as a MAGA Republican, NRA member, happily married with a wife who has never said "you don't need another gun". Retired first responder living FAT on my union negotiated state pension.
comment in response to
post
Suicide rate per capita in Japan is the same as here in the US. Japan has very little gun ownership. Since you think it's the guns, explain why Japan's suicide rate is not far lower than ours.
comment in response to
post
As a gun owner, and ccdw person, I just wanted to let you know that none of us gun owners give a rat's a$$ where you think we should go.
comment in response to
post
"Military style" weapons mean it looks like something used by the military, but does not function like the one used by the military.
comment in response to
post
Legit ICE agents tried to get illegals with detainers. Activist courts ignored them, & liberal mayors and governors won't allow police to report or hold them when they are arrested for serious crimes. This is what you end up with.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
Arresting people illegally in our country is not tyranny.
comment in response to
post
That's why I own two.
comment in response to
post
If requiring an ID disenfranchised a person's ability to vote, and affects poor & minorities disproportionately, then you have to agree that requiring an ID to buy a gun equally disenfranchised the same people to exercise their 2nd Amendment rights.
comment in response to
post
They have tried to use detainer papers to arrest known illegals who have been charged with crimes. Judges ignore them and liberal mayors won't allow police to notify them, so this is what you get.
comment in response to
post
Law enforcement can legally detain you while investigating a crime. (illegal immigration is a crime) If they have probable cause, they can arrest you. Then they see a judge. I don't know where the idea started that a warrant or a judge is needed prior to an arrest.
comment in response to
post
Stand Y our Ground law only protects you in you are acting lawfully. Impending a lawful detention of illegal immigrants bonds that.
comment in response to
post
Rifles predate the Bill of Rights.