michaelhoffman.bsky.social
Chair, Computational BIology and Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network.
Associate Professor, Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto.
Disclosures: https://github.com/michaelmhoffman/disclosure/
3,440 posts
15,818 followers
1,547 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
📌
comment in response to
post
"SurveyMonkey technology". Folks I can't even
comment in response to
post
Take an extra drink if they suggest that space is needed for *three* cars per household.
comment in response to
post
At Economic and Community Development Committee this week, he seemed visibly burned out. Hope he gets a good break.
comment in response to
post
lol! Maybe a constitutional difference in how much skepticism is engrained in different professional tracks.
comment in response to
post
In my experience, non-ML trained biomed faculty often have good instincts about what is and is not possible with ML but are concerned they are missing something made possible by new technology.
They are not!
comment in response to
post
Discover even exists for those who want it!
comment in response to
post
*golf clap*
comment in response to
post
Maybe an ignorant question, but if they don't have formal orders, why are they there?
comment in response to
post
Like rent control or not, it's not up to the City of Toronto. The solution isn't to wait until the province removes the post-2018 exemption before we start building more homes.
(And to be clear, I like Ontario-style rent control. Except for the post-2018 landlord giveaway from Doug Ford.)
comment in response to
post
If you ever get any better explanations for what happened here, I definitely want to know about it!
comment in response to
post
I liked the "Tu quoque, Brute" version better.
comment in response to
post
The above was justifying a framing because of its rhetorical effect on one audience while pretending that it has no effect on another.
comment in response to
post
I don't know the answers to these questions in general.
I do know that people who argue that certain practices are required in science had damn well better follow those practices.
comment in response to
post
Or, as I've said before x.com/michaelhoffm...
comment in response to
post
And I am with Kevin and Carl here—there are a lot of necessary improvements to scientific research, but that does not excuse making unjustified claims about the scope of the problem for rhetorical purposes. That itself is bad science!
comment in response to
post
Pragmatically, the unwarranted crisis framing has now blown up in our faces.
comment in response to
post
Today, so far
comment in response to
post
Yes, although it makes a serendipitous illustration of Fletcher's record of substantively holding improvements
comment in response to
post
Not shown: 6 more items held by Paula Fletcher.
comment in response to
post
I once saw the Greens described as "Tories who Garden". No one exemplifies that better than Dianne Saxe. Likes to tout her environmental credentials, but often fights against things that will make meaningful improvements to the environment. This is just another example.
comment in response to
post
I miss the heyday of other bookstores generally but buying textbooks at mine around the turn of the century was not unlike the Beer Store. More of a warehouse than a place for browsing.
comment in response to
post
No campus bookstore? Then where will tourists and parents buy institution-branded merch? 😱
comment in response to
post
I almost never get a response from @diannesaxe.bsky.social's office on anything. Least responsive representative I've ever had at any level of government. Not exaggerating.
comment in response to
post
Outrageous.
I would like to thank you for your hard work to make things better over the years.
comment in response to
post
How tall is tall?
comment in response to
post
To some extent, that is what they mean.
comment in response to
post
The police response was horrible. I hope she reports to 311. Not sure how much legwork MLS will do to identify the dog and owner, but if she can get their name and address they will probably issue a Dangerous Dog Order.
comment in response to
post
Sorry, #notallpundits, Mr. Bouie.
comment in response to
post
Why don't pundits have object permanence?