michaelwi.bsky.social
1,868 posts
409 followers
725 following
Getting Started
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
No official enforcement.
She’s relying on inspiring vigilantes who police whether someone looks woman or man enough.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
All hail sausage fingers
comment in response to
post
This is damning.
Not only that but it is self-damning.
comment in response to
post
Worth noting that a section 31 indicates that the information requested has a potential risk to undermine the ability of that public body to enact the law.
They think their emails prove they are unable to provide impartial advice to the public about trans people.
ico.org.uk/for-organisa...
comment in response to
post
Doesn’t mean he likes her though…..
comment in response to
post
I believe that’s what’s commonly known as cankles
comment in response to
post
Ditto for the hair
comment in response to
post
That’s what happens when she has no gay friends.
comment in response to
post
Sounds like they don’t want the neighbours to see their party then!
comment in response to
post
Is it to stop people being able to see in?
Because if so I’m more willing to guess it’s for swinging or nudism!
comment in response to
post
Bribery, corruption, hate speech?
They’re all criminal right?
comment in response to
post
I think it’s enough proof that they’ve admitted that if the public saw their conversations with a hate organisation that the public would lose confidence in them.
That’s damning. That’s the story in itself.
comment in response to
post
I really wouldn’t be. They never shy away from a mistake. They just double down on it.
comment in response to
post
Oh yes. They definitely do. But I think that’s because they didn’t realise how pique was actually spelled.
comment in response to
post
So while potential it seems far more likely to me that the group that always parrot words without knowing their meaning did the same here with a typo.
comment in response to
post
I dunno. It seems rather odd that they came up with a word that means to inspire interest in that happens to be pronounced the exact same way as pique.
Also if they’re peak then that’s the most triggered point they will be at. Their ‘peak’ which is not the case.
comment in response to
post
I can try some but not sure I have any specific contacts (although I did hear a rumour that I might know someone connected to her).
comment in response to
post
Also not elected to serve racist ideology? Does crafty not know who his base is?
comment in response to
post
Have you tried getting in contact with inane kheliff’s representation? They may be willing to provide an impact statement.
comment in response to
post
In fairness how would we know if the greens are refusing. BBC never invites them on.
comment in response to
post
Also check out the predicted costs per episode. That’s a lot of money to invest in the hope her reputation doesn’t take an Elon musk style nose dive due to her online activity.
comment in response to
post
To confirm are they collecting all responses or trans responses?
As I’d happily include mine but not if it weakens the overall message of it being a representation of the trans community.
comment in response to
post
To confirm are they collecting all responses or trans responses?
As I’d happily include mine but not if it weakens the message being cis.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
The issue is that the EHRC chair, Falkner, is transphobic and was appointed specifically to implement sex segregation.
I do not believe she is interpreting the law correctly.
And I think she has a vested interest in 'misinterpreting' it.
comment in response to
post
The only time where someone would think human rights don’t apply is if someone does not consider the group under discussion human.
That’s the kind of person who now leads the EHRC and their thoughts about trans people.
comment in response to
post
Could be false flag duffield urine.
After all she takes the piss constantly so she must have to get rid of it somewhere.
comment in response to
post
They can also claim it has ongoing commercial implications as it’s an active contract.
comment in response to
post
That’s basically an admission that it’s got pineapple on it.
comment in response to
post
It’s just a shame for him that the terf troll army is about to be dementors.
comment in response to
post
But even she knows he’s a shit actor otherwise she’d have given him a job in her Harry Potter reboot.
comment in response to
post
It’s also because they’re stupid enough to think that pique is spelt like how it sounds and doubled down on it when laughed at.
comment in response to
post
Unfortunately the impacts to trans people are probably still not going to be taken seriously.
What will be taken seriously be when something bad happens to a cis (white straight) person accused of being trans.
comment in response to
post
I’m also worried about the messaging to the public. After all the usage of public facilities and their policing relies more on general public than officials and the EHRC has been repeatedly using press to spread misinformation.
comment in response to
post
She told the UN the exact opposite when pulled up about institutional transphobia by the UN.
Now she’s boasting about doing it.
comment in response to
post
I agree. I think they panicked and immediately released their anti-trans rhetoric to try to cement it as law in the publics mind (even if it was not true in reality).
I think that will end up being their mistake as it clearly contradicts the SC judgement which said not lost trans protection.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
“Ok miss Falkner it’s now chromosomes. By the way I’ve not seen your lab results so before you go to the toilet please provide proof of your chromosomes to the security guard”
“Oh no proof. So we’re just relying on self ID now?”
comment in response to
post
Absolutely. This open admission invalidates everything they've ever said about trans people, as they are coming at it from a illegal position.
comment in response to
post
One of the questions I’ve asked my MP and will request in my consultation response is for a worked example on how an LGBTQ organisation or LGBTQ supportive business can exclude those with gender critical beliefs in order to achieve the legitimate aim of a LGBTQ friendly space.
comment in response to
post
Maybe she meant that the EHRC has not lost the trust of just trans people. Now that’s at least a correct statement.
comment in response to
post
Dr David Bull(shit)
comment in response to
post
In fairness that does explain a lot of boomer behaviour…..
comment in response to
post
FFS that idiot needs to have Enid blyton pointed out to her.
No books have ever got kids to read indeed.