mikejmayberry.bsky.social
24 posts
46 followers
20 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Also note that a bunch of those cuts are set to happen in 2029 right now. They're trying to scam the people who want cuts by making them long after they cut taxes as well as their base by blaming the next administration for the cuts when they actually come into effect.
comment in response to
post
I'd like to propose a sister show where Turnip cabinet members compete to avoid being sent to El Salvador. Make in the vein of ninja warrior, with a nearly impossible final obstacle.
comment in response to
post
It's a good thing that she's green. If she was still brown the Icetapo would have her in El Salvador by now.
comment in response to
post
What odds do I get that Whiskeyleaks set this up to take attention off of himself
comment in response to
post
Now bring him tf back!
comment in response to
post
So you really don't understand what is going on? Remedial advocacy is not something that I have time for, you'll have to educate yourself.
comment in response to
post
If you don't understand the concept of persisting until a goal is reached I don't know what I can do to explain it to you.
comment in response to
post
Aim for under 150 so they call in the Twitter loans
comment in response to
post
Frothy and the Ruski!
comment in response to
post
Should we be keeping quiet about the fact that Luigi is not on the island with Mario?
comment in response to
post
If anything, their DEI stance helps to counter balance their diesel emissions games from a few years back.
comment in response to
post
I have to admit that it bugs me to click on a heart icon to indicate my appreciation for a post revealing this sort of malevolence.
comment in response to
post
If you want to know how far our northern neighbors can go when pushed, look up their WWI corned beef story.
comment in response to
post
We need to hold the moral high ground here. I suggest starting a No-Fund-Me campaign to collect the myriad thoughts and prayers into a single lump sum payment for him.
comment in response to
post
You're not remotely objective. You are incredibly emotionally invested, to the extent that you choose to lash out at anyone who gives you a factual answer you don't like.
comment in response to
post
Maybe if you tried to be objective it would help.
comment in response to
post
You're attacking people who answer your questions.
The topic of discussion here is the electoral college. It's written into the constitution. Abolishing it requires amending same.
I said exactly nothing about pro Palestinian groups.
comment in response to
post
You're the type of person to insist that if we just got the engine running we could then drive the car to the auto part store and buy the missing parts we need to get the engine running.
comment in response to
post
All I see you doing is whining.
comment in response to
post
You asked why a thing didn't happen in the past, then whined about the answer. I concur that there are too many obdurate whiners involved in the discussion.
comment in response to
post
Probably because amending the constitution requires such a supermajority that it doesn't sound like a real option.
comment in response to
post
On a totally unrelated note, you will want to generate different random from addresses if you want realistic testing conditions for a mailer app.
comment in response to
post
Dry humor is the best humor.
comment in response to
post
"Stop squirming, you're making it even harder to find a vein..."