mikiemez.bsky.social
171 posts
88 followers
15 following
Getting Started
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
What's sadder than being on the wrong side of an issue even Tucker Carlson is on the right side of? Being outwitted by Tucker Carlson. Cripes!
comment in response to
post
It comes from horse opera - Star Wars was essentially a western in space. I believe horse opera came from soap opera, but I'm less confident of that.
comment in response to
post
Yet after posting evidence I was right you quadruple down. It's shameful, but alas... anyway, as I said, you provided evidence I was right. Thank you. I'll shut up now that you've acknowledged I was correct.
comment in response to
post
What would you accept? The fact that when I said you don't want even handed, honest reporting but rather left-wing partisan reporting you responded by complaining that the NYT reported on Clinton's email server - exactly the sort of thing any legitimate news source would have done?
comment in response to
post
I know - I realized that later. You posted evidence that I was right, and I appreciate that. Thank you. I'll shut up now that you've kindly proven me right.
comment in response to
post
Sorry, I just realized you mean that you showed me evidence _I_ am right and therefore I should shut up. You're right, you did show me evidence I am right. Thanks for acknowledging that. I'll shut up now.
comment in response to
post
You have yet to show me any evidence. I'm too busy to keep wasting time on BS, but show me evidence and I'll gladly take a peek. The problem is that you won't "shut the fuck up" despite not having any evidence to show me; that's not _why_ you're wrong, although it's evidence _you know_ you're wrong.
comment in response to
post
Man, whoever is paying all of those paid protesters must be broke now.
Oh, wait, it's the same ~50 people at all protests, isn't it? I guess they keep walking down the street and taking new photos, splicing them together, then moving to the next city?
comment in response to
post
You just don't stop with the bullshit, do you? I have more important things to do than repeatedly point out what a massive lair you are, so have fun continuing to mimic Donald Trump. You know that you're full of shit, you know I'm not, I'm good with that.
comment in response to
post
Why would you want to do that? Is he paying you? Yuck!
comment in response to
post
I'm not your honey, and they are not full right wing. You clearly know that, so please just either be honest or stop.
comment in response to
post
Honestly, I can't even see how you'd try to pretend you got that from what I said. Are you on massive doses of ketamine? Were you responding to the wrong comment? You were responding to the wrong comment, weren't you? Don't be embarrassed; it's hardly the most ridiculous thing you've done lately.
comment in response to
post
I can't imagine you are not understanding it correctly, which indicates you're intentionally lying about what it said. How could you be so stupid as to get that from it? You must be lying when you say you do. Dishonest.
comment in response to
post
If you just ignore them completely, that feeds their argument to their base that the media shouldn't be trusted at all; let them print their nonsense, acknowledging it exists, and people can see how bad it is while showing their conservative friends that the media aren't completely ignoring them.
comment in response to
post
See? That's not all what I've said and it's nonsensical to say that acknowledging fascist opinions exist is giving them equal time. It's another sign you aren't truly liberal that you seem to believe that they aren't just being given an opportunity to show how wrong they are.
comment in response to
post
Blathering means you're not making much sense, and your dishonest blathering is indeed not making much sense. That isn't and/or, just as media isn't simply left wing partisan or kowtowing to Trump.
comment in response to
post
So long as you're just spouting disprovable nonsense because you're sad the Times isn't perfectly left wing partisan, though, you won't convince me they're kneeling to Trump yet.
comment in response to
post
You should also explain why, although the woman who recently defended Rowling's anti-trans crusade has left, the NYT hasn't seen anything like the WaPo gusher of people quitting because they don't want to be stuck working at a paper kowtowing to Trump.
comment in response to
post
At the moment I definitely don't believe you're a liberal; you give the impression of being just as much of a fascist wanting to control media as the GOP is.
comment in response to
post
Otherwise, I'll be convinced you're just a whiny little lying bitch, no true liberal at all, anxious that no one ever make any attempt at representing all sides but rather determined everyone should always agree with you and read only what you want them to.
comment in response to
post
If you can do all of that, with verifiable evidence that I've somehow missed all of that and have not be the one honest person in this convo the entire time, I will apologize for having thought you were spouting nonsense because you were pissed the NYT isn't calling you for direction.
comment in response to
post
Why don't you find evidence the NYT declared "We are going to be writing every day in support and defense of two pillars: personal liberties and free markets... viewpoints opposing those pillars will be left to be published by others."
comment in response to
post
cartoons critical of Trump, refused to Endorse anyone because they didn't want to not endorse Trump in 2024, etc., etc., etc.
comment in response to
post
I'm hardly centrist, although your persistent bullshitting may well drive some people insane. I'll tell you way, you weaselly little lying cretin, why don't you just provide evidence that the Times has lost many staff because they killed multiple works critical to Trump, refused to run editorial...
comment in response to
post
That's not a ridiculous way to read a sentence at all, why don't you do an intelligent response or something - but not ffs, because you clearly don't need to be extending your gene pool. For the sake of not f***ing, instead.
comment in response to
post
Nope, I'm just aware that not being highly partisan towards the left and occasionally failing by striving too hard to be non-partisan is a hell of a lot different from cancelling endorsements and firing people to appease Trump. You know that too; why not be honest about it?
comment in response to
post
I think you can mean you can always spot the honest man responding to an unrepentant liar because he says you're being dishonest even though there is ample and verifiable evidence that you're being dishonest.
comment in response to
post
So you're saying you're a bot because you're denying what I've said is true?
comment in response to
post
Yes, you were being dishonest in your blathering. Is water H20 or is it wet?
comment in response to
post
Well, at least there is _some_ bullshit you aren't eating and spouting back out.
comment in response to
post
NYT isn't perfect and it sometimes fails by striving too hard to remain non-partisan. That's better by far than actively kowtowing to Trump - and you know that. You're just bitter that they aren't trying to be highly partisan towards the left so you're spouting BS. Be better than that. Be honest.
comment in response to
post
...but what I just said is true. What YOU just said isn't true. I get that you want to pretend that everything that is not highly partisan towards the left is highly partisan towards the right, but how is spreading the same bullshit the MAGAniacs spread supposed to help anything?
comment in response to
post
Does that mean you are Russian, btw? That would explain why you're trying to discredit a paper making a genuine if flawed attempt at remaining non-partisan which continually produces reporting very damning to Trump.
comment in response to
post
Thanks for your cogent and serious comment. I get that you know what I said was true yet still wanted to pretend it wasn't without having any actual way to honestly refute it, but for you to jump so firmly into proving yourself to be a moron was unnecessary (but kind).
comment in response to
post
The Dems are far from perfect, but they're worlds away from the GOP on the fascism scale. Obama was trying too hard to appease the right on the issue, not trying to implement fascist policies across the board. So make sure you represent both sides honestly.
comment in response to
post
You also don't need to say anything as imbecilic as "to cape," btw.
comment in response to
post
How do you think your nonsense is better than the MAGAniacs claiming the NYT is highly partisan to the far left just because it isn't doing what Faux News Channel and Newsmax do? You're being nearly as dishonest as they are.
comment in response to
post
I'm "caping" for honesty. NYT isn't perfect, but you know full well that what I said is true. _You_ don't need to insist that if a paper makes a sincere attempt at being non-partisan rather than being wholly partisan to your own preferred side that does not mean it's wholly partisan to the other.
comment in response to
post
Humans are animals. I think you mean "between humans and other animals."
comment in response to
post
Perhaps, perhaps not, but it's confirmation that McArdle doesn't think it hurts liberals and their causes.
comment in response to
post
They struggle with the Second Amendment. How often do you see them accept "well regulated" firearm ownership?
comment in response to
post
On the facts? No, we can't disagree on the facts. You know what I said is true, but you want to just disagree on whether or not to acknowledge reality?
comment in response to
post
I suppose next you're going to jump into "The Democratic Party and the Republican Party are the same!" nonsense.
comment in response to
post
When one party is fascist? If you're going to be dishonest, please at least don't insult our intelligence with such transparent blathering. At least try to come up with a lie you could possibly be foolish enough to believe.