modanesh.bsky.social
CS PhD @mcgill.ca and @mila-quebec.bsky.social, working on 🍒 and 🤖 stuff
ex- @LetsUnifyAI, @NUSComputing, @EngineeringOSU
https://modanesh.github.io/
📍 Montreal, Canada
19 posts
1,396 followers
218 following
Getting Started
Conversation Starter
comment in response to
post
I think droid is the closest
comment in response to
post
Need some help 😅
comment in response to
post
Incredible visualization, Harley! Can't stop watching it! 👏
comment in response to
post
Not sure about how updated it is. But it has options to see scores before/after rebuttal.
comment in response to
post
from here: papercopilot.com/statistics/i...
comment in response to
post
6/ Research integrity demands better. The #ICLR community deserves a more rigorous and fair process. If we care about quality, we need to hold conferences accountable for their decisions.
comment in response to
post
5/ And let’s be clear: it’s not the big tech companies bearing the brunt of this broken system. It’s PhD students and independent researchers who suffer most. Low-quality peer reviews impact their careers, publications, and opportunities, while corporations skate by.
comment in response to
post
4/ When conference acceptance becomes this arbitrary, it’s not just about individual papers. We’re undermining the entire scientific evaluation system—and that affects the integrity of AI research as a whole.
comment in response to
post
3/ There are a few key questions that come to mind:
1- Did removing ratings of 4 and 7 distort the review system?
2- Has forcing author reviews led to systematically low-quality evaluations?
3- Could the changes in the review process be impacting overall quality standards?
comment in response to
post
2/ Here’s the issue: the top ~30% of papers have average ratings starting around 5.6. But since 6 is "borderline accept," this means papers below the "borderline accept" threshold will get accepted. How does this make sense?
comment in response to
post
If we'd avoided the 'learning' label, we'd still be hearing 'but can it think?' Now we just get 'is it conscious?' Guess we leveled up the existential questions! 😃
comment in response to
post
But it was advertised by a deepminder of I'm not mistaken
comment in response to
post
👋