Profile avatar
mose-in-socks.bsky.social
21 posts 17 followers 4 following
Conversation Starter
comment in response to post
Lol ‘scientific books’
comment in response to post
Ahh so that’s why there was a lone guy back there? I guess hoping it was a catchable miss..
comment in response to post
I think they were amending your claim - as in they certainly will
comment in response to post
Internet service doesn’t seem to have come with the economizing of computers, smartphones,etc./2
comment in response to post
Tech has long been a status symbol. Really, the only tech that is significant and remains widely unavailable (e.g a luxury) is air conditioning. Certain forces have made most tech widely available (or necessary) so that the status symbol is no longer so stark/apparent./1
comment in response to post
Also why are we watering it backhanded-AI-ily?
comment in response to post
Dangerous is right. ‘Algorithms of Oppression’ type stuff.
comment in response to post
Isn’t this against the whole point of establishment American consumer healthcare? You consume as much as you want or can pay for..
comment in response to post
Extra dumb: seeking data (happens to not exist) from people (scientists) you happen to believe need to be displaced in terms of expertise. Making stuff up would be more logical..
comment in response to post
Right. That branding was part of the effectiveness/appeal of Austerity policy.
comment in response to post
Right, kind of like Austerity that branded national budgets as household ones. Makes cuts palatable as belt-tightening or some other BS equivalence.
comment in response to post
‘Truth to Nature’ was the mode for a while. Science gained some organizational footholds, so ‘Truth to Standard’ became prominent. ‘Mechanical Objectivity’ is another mode and relates to the reliability/infallibility of technology. But then questions like ‘tech built by who?’ or ‘…that does what?’.
comment in response to post
There’s a book by Daston and Galison called Objectivity. I read a chapter that traced the shift of objectivity’s meaning in science.
comment in response to post
Yes, it’s all about status. Notice Trump presented himself as a savvy mediator and cooed when lobbed a softball about being a peacemaker. Then shows he’s neither by equating the hardships of war with the hardships of a country’s media saying ‘not nice’ things.
comment in response to post
It might be telling that in how trump defends putin (which has some reasonable basis in terms of the USA being a supposed mediator) he equates the hardships of war with the ‘hardship’ of another country’s various media saying ‘not nice’ things about you.
comment in response to post
bsky.app/profile/mose...
comment in response to post
In a weird way, you have to admire their commitments to stuff that have as part of that stuff, a limit on the popularity of that stuff.
comment in response to post
The CDC says it’s okay to have a little bit of lunacy.
comment in response to post
Have a ‘pickup where you left off’ feature.