mrschickenz.bsky.social
Old woman.
I WILL IMMEDIATELY BLOCK ANYONE WHO DMS ME UNLESS REQUESTED. So don't bother
94 posts
142 followers
209 following
Prolific Poster
Conversation Starter
comment in response to
post
2/2 he could be the mew scapegoat, in a heartbeat.
What is wrong with these people?
Now they're onto Sadiq Khan's knighthood.
You have to listen to the frothing of your enemy 🥴
comment in response to
post
Exactly.
comment in response to
post
Why does the BBC need to 'win over' Reform voters??
It is not their job to 'win over' any particular political view.
It is not their job to promote any particular political viewpoint.
They certainly shouldn't be promoting a party with 5 MPs as the only other party in Parliament.
comment in response to
post
If GB had put pensions up by c. £20 a month, we wouldn't be having this convo now (see also TV licence fiasco). They're always introduced as a sweetie & are very likely to go tits up at a future date. I always thought they would have to change the threshold at some point.
comment in response to
post
Bot
comment in response to
post
Exactly 🙄
comment in response to
post
For a larf appears to be the main reason. They are simpletons.
comment in response to
post
Oh ffs, look it up yourself. It's easy to find.
comment in response to
post
Dozy Don
comment in response to
post
The debate continually misses the elephant in the room. Charles III is also Canada's head of state.
What's the point of the Commonwealth if its most senior figure gives a red carpet welcome to someone who keeps threatening to annex one of its members.
I'm embarrassed to be British over it tbh.
comment in response to
post
So much for 'respecting the rights of transgender humans' oh, they didn't mean humans.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
It seems to have been replaced by 'welfare' in an attempt to scapegoat claimants. I don't like that & I particularly don't like the way left leaning politicians & journalists have also enthusiastically adopted it.
comment in response to
post
Off topic, I know, but if everyone is going to be outraged by cuts to 'welfare', they could start calling 'welfare' SOCIAL SECURITY. Then the outrage would seem more genuine.
comment in response to
post
They don't even know the meaning of the words😈
comment in response to
post
Are they fuck! 🙂
comment in response to
post
I don't think the Orangoshitgibbon will be nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize, do you?
comment in response to
post
They don't actually seem to care about real people.
comment in response to
post
If you didn't know before, Putin has made it plain. He must be stopped.