nicotinelozeng.bsky.social
Physician (FRCP)
Cat valet
Elbows up
Vescere bracis meis
4,072 posts
703 followers
756 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Are you still sore about the insulin evidence - was that you? I remember you flounced off claiming that I'm not a real doctor, or something along those lines.
comment in response to
post
It was the point.
comment in response to
post
Why do you think that?
comment in response to
post
I think you missed something.
comment in response to
post
Another charmer.
comment in response to
post
She must have been a CNS in a particularly tough speciality.
comment in response to
post
That would include her.
comment in response to
post
The 20-30 years range is what the internet suggests. It's the average or ballpark time from birth to having your first child of the next generation.
Otherwise known as a biological generation.
comment in response to
post
So what? If they meant "a political generation", that's what they would have said. But they didn't. Words matter.
comment in response to
post
I quoted Alex Salmond, the leader of the SNP and FM at the time. Was he trolling?
comment in response to
post
I don't know why you can't discuss this without trying to negate my expertise.
Letby wrote "I killed them on purpose" on a post-it note in her diary.
Why would she write that?
comment in response to
post
Once in a lifetime of a fruit fly.
comment in response to
post
Nothing to unpick, other than the prospect of yet another divisive vote after such a short time.
This is exactly what Salmond & Cameron were trying to avoid.
comment in response to
post
It's the neverendum which I oppose. Have another go in 10 years.
comment in response to
post
Come off it.
www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/scot...
comment in response to
post
Maybe you could respect the result of your referendum.
comment in response to
post
Not in Scotland! They came third.
comment in response to
post
It's also why it's a sensitive topic for you.
comment in response to
post
I was living in Scotland at the time. I saw it.
comment in response to
post
Salmond & Cameron agreed it publicly. Neither said never.
comment in response to
post
I don't know whether things would be better or worse for the RUK if Scotland left.
It would certainly be a lot quieter, and the SNP would have to concentrate on governing rather than going on & on about independence. Maybe it's a good idea.
comment in response to
post
It was a bilateral agreement, not just Salmond. That's why it was a big deal at the time.
comment in response to
post
Truth-twisters, the SNP.
comment in response to
post
Another insult, thanks.
comment in response to
post
The reason why I return to Letby is that the media are not reporting it responsibly, leading to renewed distress for the bereaved.
All these "new" ideas from the so-called "expert panel" were already refuted in court. Shoo Lee has misrepresented the facts.
comment in response to
post
Genuine miscarriages of justice are an entirely different matter, obviously.
2/2
comment in response to
post
David Davis' crankery isn't confined to Letby.
The Letby scapegoating narrative was examined in detail in court, and disproved. She was unable to point to any evidence to support the idea, and the police found none.
Her new KC is merely repeating her previous defence arguments.
1/2
comment in response to
post
Reform PLC need to explain why they should govern.
All Farage offers is unfunded tax cuts and abolition of the NHS.
comment in response to
post
Don't go camping where there are lions. Camp somewhere else.
Seems like an easy fix.
comment in response to
post
That's still irrelevant to this very public agreement between the two sides. It was obviously coordinated. Can you imagine the reaction if only DC had said it.
comment in response to
post
Letby hasn't been wrongly imprisoned.
comment in response to
post
The point is that it was agreed by both sides.
comment in response to
post
Irrelevant to this event.
comment in response to
post
I'm not a Unionist.
comment in response to
post
It doesn't matter whether or not it's in the Edinburgh agreement.
A generation is 20-30 years.
comment in response to
post
It's a commonly-used term. CyberNats became notorious for their bullying tactics. They drew attention to themselves.
comment in response to
post
David Davis is a serial crank. Letby's just the latest example of his feeble-minded approach to issues. His instinct is to bash the NHS using the conspiracy theory that Letby was a scapegoat for a failing unit. The originator of this theory is none other than Lucy Letby.
comment in response to
post
Very dumb for a non-white person to chair a racist party.
comment in response to
post
There what is?
comment in response to
post
So what?
comment in response to
post
I was living in Scotland during IndyRef1.
comment in response to
post
Scotland is a country within the multinational state of the United Kingdom. I live in one of the others.
It obviously affects all of the UK.
comment in response to
post
Ad hom is a logical fallacy.
Insults are never far away whenever cyberNats are around.
comment in response to
post
Not everything is in the Edinburgh agreement, but Salmond & Cameron clearly coordinated their remarks, and it was a big deal at the time.
comment in response to
post
The last IndyRef caused nothing but division & strife, and also achieved nothing. "No" voters were widely intimidated by the cyberNats, and nobody put No posters in the windows of their houses, nor stickers in their cars, even though No was the majority view.
comment in response to
post
Does the SNP have any other button?
comment in response to
post
DC agreed.
comment in response to
post
Both DC & AS made a point of saying it to journos. It was clearly pre-arranged and agreed on.