Profile avatar
not2b.sfba.social.ap.brid.gy
(he/him) Aging tech nerd, living in Silicon Valley. I'm an avid hiker and geocacher. [bridged from https://sfba.social/@not2b on the fediverse by https://fed.brid.gy/ ]
250 posts 8 followers 2 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
@dangillmor But this action is taken by a guy who is leaving UMich, evidently to curry favor with his new bosses in Florida, not by anyone still there.
comment in response to post
@Nonilex I never understood why Biden didn't manage to force out DeJoy, who was just awful (though I'm sure that anyone Trump names will be even worse).
comment in response to post
@phocks White GenX Americans vote to the right of boomers as well as all younger generations, and helped even more than boomers did to give us Trump. Sorry, not particularly cool.
comment in response to post
@volts.wtf I am following you from Mastodon, via the bridge. Your edit button is over here. It works just fine.
comment in response to post
@w7voa How does this work if the VOA isn't currently operating? Or does this just mean that a VOA reporter is helping to produce the pool reporting for other media?
comment in response to post
@Nonilex Is anyone using because Trump has exceeded his authority? The Constitution gives the tariff power to Congress. Congress said the president can impose tariffs as an emergency measure, in specific circumstances. Seems films are not an emergency.
comment in response to post
@futurebird I hate the transitions. But I like the later light in summer, and having daylight time all year would make it too dark in the mornings in winter. I suppose that if schedules were more flexible it wouldn't matter.
comment in response to post
@Nonilex I don't buy this story. Laura Loomer, who Trump for some reason Trump loves, has been demanding #MikeWaltz 's scalp for some time, and has crowed about his firing on social media. I think they are retconning a justification.
comment in response to post
@Holberg It is called Amazon.
comment in response to post
@Nonilex I think he thought that Canadians could write him in.
comment in response to post
@Nonilex So this is what the law firms that bent the knee to Trump, agreeing to provide hundreds of millions in pro bono work, will now be doing: defending cops who kill protesters and the like.
comment in response to post
@cdarwin The source for this is one anonymous tweet. People are referencing a Der Spiegel article, but that article only mentions the arrest. Not Hegseth
comment in response to post
@jerasikehorn.bsky.social The Hatch Act doesn't apply to Obama. He isn't a federal employee.
comment in response to post
@w7voa Calling it "misleading" is way too kind.
comment in response to post
@GossiTheDog Anyone reading this and getting ideas: please don't fuck with the crosswalks. Blind people rely on the voices to cross the street safely.
comment in response to post
@Nonilex The lobbyists can kill it by telling Trump (correctly) that using Medicare's negotiating power to lower drug prices was a Biden thing. That will be enough to get him to stop it.
comment in response to post
@Holberg You can bet on the next pope, and a lot of bookies have posted odds. But you can't do a bracket because there is only one game: we only hear about the new pope, any intermediate stages where candidates lose out are secret. The two favorites are Luis Antonio Tagle and Pietro Parolin from […]
comment in response to post
@timbray Some improvements have been made here. When I followed the link to the fediverse post in your blog posting and attempted to reply, I got a "take me home" prompt. I only needed to type the first two characters of my instance for the autocomplete to give me the rest, and "take me home" so […]
comment in response to post
@mattblaze @heidilifeldman The court gave Trump immunity for official acts, but that doesn't apply to his underlings. Guess he could pardon them though.
comment in response to post
@VeroniqueB99 Continuous glucose monitors (like the one my type 1 diabetic wife has) work well enough. The much more difficult problem is keeping the blood sugar level in range; even with an insulin pump it is a real pain.
comment in response to post
@GottaLaff Respect. She was the only member of Congress to vote against GW Bush's overly broad authorization for use of force, and later events showed that she was right and everyone else was wrong. I was surprised to see that she is 78, she certainly seems a good deal younger.
comment in response to post
@Nonilex I thought I had remembered that the Trump administration threatened Ukraine with exactly this (disabling US planes they were given). So all the Russians have to do is repeat the threat.
comment in response to post
@dogzilla Harvard's endowment puts them in a good position to fight this, and I am glad that they are standing up to Trump. Just not sure that the courts are enough.
comment in response to post
@dogzilla The problem is that the Trump administration hasn't been complying when courts order the restoration of funds. So if they win in court and Trump defies the courts, then what?
comment in response to post
@Lazarou Unfortunately the trolls that no longer have 4chan will be looking for a new place, and many will come here.
comment in response to post
@bruces Sounds like Kaluza and Klein's theory which didn't work out.
comment in response to post
@jef Yes, this exists, and it's risky AF. The problem is prompt injection. The problem is that the LLM can't tell your commands from things in the data that looks like commands, so if you ask your LLM-based agent to summarize your email, someone might have sent you an email that orders the LLM […]
comment in response to post
@Nonilex I am sure that some people were tipped off. But I am also pretty sure that there were some investors that bought big after the huge drop in the stock market on the assumption that Trump would have to reverse course and prices would go back up, without any knowledge of exactly when this […]
comment in response to post
@Nonilex Does the bill still make it extremely difficult for a married woman who changed her name and doesn't have a passport to vote?
comment in response to post
@GottaLaff I expected that he would back off, or ease some of them if people kissed his ass. The thing is, no business is going to move production to the US because of the Trump tariffs, precisely because he keeps changing his mind and changing the numbers. It takes huge investment and several […]
comment in response to post
@GottaLaff Let's have more backlash and get more of their damage undone and the old, good stuff restored.
comment in response to post
@bruces Even better if you own a nondescript van and park it on the street in front.
comment in response to post
@Holberg Well, it does mean that we should mock all of the CEOs, bankers, and VCs who supported him who now seem to be surprised that he's done exactly what he repeatedly said he would do.
comment in response to post
@jef Or the CNBC people. They liked him, but they like their investments more. Seems they just figured out this week that Trump isn't good for them.
comment in response to post
@GottaLaff He should lay himself off (resign). That would not be a mistake.
comment in response to post
@GottaLaff Seems the tariffs affect the budget, so if 51 senators want to, they can attach this as an item in the budget reconciliation. But it would take more guts than we have seen so far: Schumer and some others might back down again rather than be blamed for a government shutdown.
comment in response to post
@dangillmor People don't have an instinctual understanding for large numbers, and often they are easier to understand if we divide by the population. So a billion dollars is about $3 per American, a trillion is $3,000 per American, 6 trillion is $18,000 per American. That is a huge number. What […]
comment in response to post
@briankrebs @mmasnick One more question not mentioned in the TechDirt article: have the phones of the participants in the Signal chat been analyzed for the presence of malware? They are using their personal phones, the same devices they use to surf the web, read email, post to social media, view […]
comment in response to post
@jik Did you read it? I see quite a few words: "how Democrats are pushing back against the Trump-Musk agenda", "As we fight to defend Social Security and Medicare from dangerous cuts by the Trump-Musk Administration", "how we’re fighting back against the Trump-Musk Administration’s harmful […]
comment in response to post
@johncarlosbaez That law review article seems to have missed the following text from the 12th amendment: "But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States." So no, Trump cannot run for VP.