notthomaspynchon.bsky.social
180 posts
76 followers
167 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
How about you give money to direct aid to keep your neighbors alive? Honestly sickening that genocidal actions are being taken against disabled, trans, and undocumented people, and instead of rendering aid you’re fretting about keeping your wealth intact.
comment in response to
post
🤭
comment in response to
post
No worries, friend. Tell your sweetie thanks for service to the community. 🙏🏻💙🏳️⚧️
comment in response to
post
Ok, thanks. Hope she’s ok and being housed in humane conditions. Would you mind passing on a request for contact from someone who’s organizing on this topic? If yes, would need to continue on dm or encrypted. Also ok if the relationship is too tangential to ask.
comment in response to
post
Possible to DM about this? Don’t want identifying details but info sharing about how the process is working now would be helpful to a lot of folks.
comment in response to
post
You helped and you came back to tell the rest of us. You’re setting an example for others. Thank you!
comment in response to
post
Yes, and accusing a publication of poor fact checking when in reality the bulk of what you’re talking about is topics that you think merit furhter exploration is irresponsible. If you want this written about, then write about it and don’t attack people who are doing the work.
comment in response to
post
Again, this is another important topic, but this is not the focus of the article. If you would like to write on the topic of how Canada has been tightening asylum please do as it needs to be heard.
comment in response to
post
Again, this is not a matter of fact checking. This is more on the topic of passport confiscation which also the N*zis did and being real is a standard tool of oppression for nation states. This is a related topic and crucial for another article but not a misrepresentation of facts.
comment in response to
post
what you’re calling untrue is actually the article not having additional information that you would like publicized but is not necessary to the piece. What you’re asking for—which is an exhaustive discussion about possible remedies legal and otherwise—is another article.
comment in response to
post
No need for apologies. It sucks that some people act like this, but am glad it showed that under minimization is often hatred.
comment in response to
post
This person is minimizing what actual trans people are saying—and verified reports in mainstream media—about the confiscations of trans people’s passports in federal offices. When called on to stop and to donate to direct aid for trans people, she is lashing out rather than rendering aid.
comment in response to
post
such as increasing document requirements or using vague fraud claims to reject applications. Seven, if you’re telling trans people an NGO will save them you didn’t read the article and you’re passaing the buck. They need your help to survive. Yours. Personally. Go help someone stay alive.
comment in response to
post
Five, thee’s a lack of mechanisms for restoring revoked passports, so if someone’s passport has been fevoked a successful lawsuit may not automatically restore it and would likely be delayed indefinitely through bureaucratic obstruction. Six, the potential for retaliation or policy worksarounds
comment in response to
post
un universal declaration of human rights article 13), so they can’t travel, access services or prove identity. Three, the administration is already going beyond the scope of the EO and revoking already issued passports. Four, back to SCOTUS they’ll likely uphold or weaken existing protections
comment in response to
post
First, it’s already a big leap of faith to say that rule-of-law will hold during an ingoing coup and with SCOTUS stacked with judges poised to overturn existing precedents. Two, there will be no immediate relief for those who are already interned (which btw is a human rights violation under
comment in response to
post
such as increasing document requirements or using vague fraud claims to reject applications. Seven, if you’re telling trans people an NGO will save them you didn’t read the article and you’re passaing the buck. They need your help to survive. Yours. Personally. Go help someone stay alive.
comment in response to
post
READ THE ARTICLE! And do it before minimizing when trans people say they’re being forcibly interned. If you’re minimizing this when trans people are calling for help, you are part of the problem. Go donate to a direct aid org rather than saying there’s no problem. www.thecanary.co/global/world...
comment in response to
post
Five, thee’s a lack of mechanisms for restoring revoked passports, so if someone’s passport has been fevoked a successful lawsuit may not automatically restore it and would likely be delayed indefinitely through bureaucratic obstruction. Six, the potential for retaliation or policy worksarounds
comment in response to
post
un universal declaration of human rights article 13), so they can’t travel, access services or prove identity. Three, the administration is already going beyond the scope of the EO and revoking already issued passports. Four, back to SCOTUS they’ll likely uphold or weaken existing protections
comment in response to
post
First, it’s already a big leap of faith to say that rule-of-law will hold during an ingoing coup and with SCOTUS stacked with judges poised to overturn existing precedents. Two, there will be no immediate relief for those who are already interned (which btw is a human rights violation under
comment in response to
post
Fantastic, thanks for doing that work. Will point people in that direction.
comment in response to
post
Brilliant. I thought rainbow refugee wasn’t working with trans U.S. citizens, though that might be rainbow railroad. My mistake. And thanks for the link on the law firm. Do you know anyone stateside who’s also preparing people (I know the law is in Canada but cross-border coordination never hurts)?
comment in response to
post
Great. Will look for the threads. Seems like someone (not you, you’re already doing a lot) finding a way to make this info more SEO friendly would help as searches haven’t brought this up. If it’s not much labor, do you have an org name to which folks can be directed, or something similar?
comment in response to
post
Great. Thanks for your work. Do you have these readily available for the trans folks who urgently need them? Maybe a holder website or a contact? Competent legal support urgently needed as US NGOs are overwhelmed and non-specialist in this. Thanks!
comment in response to
post
That’s very generous of you to offer. Yes, direct aid relocation organization exist, though many have folded recently. Need to check which ones have capacity. May I dm and continue on encrypted comms?
comment in response to
post
And saying that they can without further information about how to do this safely is also unhelpful. Since you educate on this, can you give real resources for how someone who wants to do this can find legal support, financial support, and social support to ensure that they can attempt this safely?
comment in response to
post
people they can claim asylum in Canada it’s with the big caveat that so far no one has been successful—and attempting without legal support could foreclose on that option in future. And if you’re a committed ally you’d help them find that legal support and maybe give them a few bucks for the trip.
comment in response to
post
Yes, anyone can theoretically claim asylum, but so far no U.S. trans person has been granted it. The one U.S. trans woman who tried had her case overturned on a federal level and is still waiting appeals. And if someone’s asylum case fails, they can’t claim it again. So if you’re going to tell
comment in response to
post
Anyone else reading this, take note that under that veneer of liberal allyship from someone who didn’t vote for this but won’t lift a finger to help you and will gaslight you for naming your persecution, is just a bigot who will throw you under the bus in a second. Also, reported for hate speech.
comment in response to
post
forced restriction of movement by a state for discriminatory or political reasons is the definition of interment. it’s a human rights violation under the u.n. universal declaration of human rights. if you’re minimising this and invalidating what trans people are saying, you’re part of the problem.
comment in response to
post
Also if you know if EU NGOs and/or private attorneys who have worked in this specific area i.e. asylum for trans people from ‘safe countries’ would also be very helpful. Thanks!
comment in response to
post
Thanks. Do you know of anyone who has done this successfully in EU from the US or other ‘safe countries’? Rynn Willgohs, the founder of TRANSport tried in Finland, but tragically completed sucide before her hearing. If you know of anyone else who has tried or been successful would be very helpful.
comment in response to
post
Also, if you had bothered to read the article you’d know ACTUAL TRANS PEOPLE being targeted are calling out those who avoid rendering aid themselves by saying solutions within the system exist. They do not. So help people trans survive—rather than passing the buck—or you are collaborating.
comment in response to
post
Not only did you skip the section of the artice about the limits to legal challenges, you are exemplifying exactly what it’s calling out. Trans people are calling for direct aid to surive—jobs, shelter, protection, escape—and instead of helping people point them to NGOs who can’t protect them.
comment in response to
post
Yes, legally there should be routes including various treaties on refugees. Have you seen instances where trans people from the U.S. or similar countries have been able to make use of them? In your opinion where it might have best chance of success? Thanks!
comment in response to
post
FYI there is an urgent need to organise transnationally to help at-risk trans people flee unsafe places. Rainbow Railroad won’t help people in places that have recently become more dangerous. No help is coming so it’s up to the community to organise.
comment in response to
post
People saying don’t come to the UK don’t know how much worse it can be in other countries. The best option is legal immigration routes like work and study if you have access.
No precedent for asylum (yet), and the first person who tries it should probs have legal strategy in place.
Possible to DM?
comment in response to
post
This is a great idea. How do you think the travel community could align with trans rights groups?
Also, are you messageable? Am organising on this topic and would appreciate inout from folks in different communities. Thanks!
(Also pardon the anon account. Some things are better done stealth.)
comment in response to
post
There are no reporte of confiscations at borders…yet. But there are reports of ICE confiscating and invalidating trans US citizens’ passports in raids.
comment in response to
post
No reports of confiscations at borders, but this goes beyond forced confiscations as passport offices during renewals, itself an act of forced internment. ICE is also invalidating trans US citizens’ passports.
comment in response to
post
It mentions the trans U.S. asylum seeker in Canda and Finland. Do you know of others?
comment in response to
post
Think only to be used in the case of an invalidation while abroad because alternative is, well, statelessness.
comment in response to
post
You might be able to get a passport for foreigners with revoked passports from your country’s immigration office.
comment in response to
post
Honestly would start looking into a 2nd passport if you have a route to eligibility. This administration doesn’t want to detransition people then let them live well-supported lives. They want to make trans & nb people non-citizen subjects and historically lack of access to valid ID’s is a shortcut.
comment in response to
post
Yo, are you ok with being messaged? Saw what you said about protected status for trans U.S. people in E.U. and would like to compare notes. Couldn’t dm but would prefer to keep this off public posts. Thanks!