Profile avatar
nthelegend.bsky.social
Creative, progressive, COS fanboy. YouTube.com/NthReview YouTube.com/TheNthCity Nickraven.Substack.com
193 posts 321 followers 447 following
Prolific Poster
Conversation Starter
comment in response to post
Like people just asking broadly for advice on how best to play a game rather than… just playing the game.
comment in response to post
After eating everyone else, fascism eats itself
comment in response to post
I feel aside from Garbology (which I never sunk into), I have some fond memories of SWFG and ITS even if they weren't quite as solid as Skelethon or TIK. I'm sure BHS will wind up the same, but despite how good some of these tracks are, it doesn't punch as hard as Aes' best work. He seems stuck.
comment in response to post
NYC, please don't mess up again.
comment in response to post
Thanks boss!
comment in response to post
Absentees went out May 2, it'll be starting May 23 for the rest of us for the June 17 election!
comment in response to post
Oh yeah, it made a lot of sense to me since a lot of critical UX stuff happens in the top left corner, so moving the task bar and my apps over there was a no-brainer when I was in high school.
comment in response to post
Jeff. Sincerely, you should watch Andor.
comment in response to post
Opposition to Karman Line is a bipartisan effort. Liberals and conservatives are against it and for largely the same reasons.
comment in response to post
Developers want to make you think, because they're ready to plonk down and sell thousands of homes for their own gain, that if you don't go with their simple solution that it won't happen at all. But that's not how cities grow. Not even slightly.
comment in response to post
There is no centralized "plan" because it's a series of incremental changes involving a variety of city entities, like urban renewal, rezoning SFH to MFH and limiting or outright declining any further annexations. A developer like One La Plata likes simple plans because they're easier to sell.
comment in response to post
No, NIMBYs oppose smart growth because it's "Not in my backyard", that's literally the name. When you're paving prairie and greenspace, there are no "backyards". NIMBYS are against upzoning, infill, urban renewal and MFH. They WANT developers to pave to the prairieland instead of in their backyards
comment in response to post
This is a grassroots bipartisan opposition. It may be slightly different reasons for different folks, but it’s unified against continued wasteful suburban sprawl.
comment in response to post
It isn’t needed. We can upzone, infill and build where city infrastructure already exists. This is an outsized expensive expansion to benefit One La Plata and to cost Colorado Springs residents for decades to come.
comment in response to post
Smart urban planning and opposing endless suburban sprawl isn’t NIMByism
comment in response to post
"She is hot."
comment in response to post
*premiere