Profile avatar
ocschwar.bsky.social
Angry about all the reasons why we cannot have nice things.
2,032 posts 94 followers 33 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
Read the San Remo Manual on blockades. If you don't intercept every vessel, you don't get to intercept any.
comment in response to post
Well, if you support forcing open a new route for armaments to Hamas, then a lot of lives don't matter to you, on both sides.
comment in response to post
What you refuse to understand is that every discovery related to global warming came from a guy whose name you can look up in under 10 minutes. If it's a lie, the first guy to publish a lie about is easy to find. Yet none of you can do it.
comment in response to post
So you admit you have no clue.
comment in response to post
No. Single individual. 10 minutes to find his name.
comment in response to post
Well the, who's the scientist who started the climate change "hoax"? Should take you under 10 minutes to find.
comment in response to post
Then you are clueless about this issue. Hint: science is done in public. If there's a hoax, there's a hoaxer.
comment in response to post
Here's one simple question to prove that you are clueless about climate change: name the scientist who started this "hoax." Should take you under 10 minutes.
comment in response to post
Glad to see today's generation of young coders have a new and rich attack surface. The dream of the 90s lives on.
comment in response to post
They mattered enough to my friend that he was getting hit with tear gas and clubs. But he (and his kids) don't matter to you at all. That's human nature.
comment in response to post
Musk folded. Government authority trumps mere money.
comment in response to post
Defending the sailors who prevented this boat from opening a new supply route to Hamas? Yes.
comment in response to post
My childhood best friend was getting his skull cracked by Israeli police on October 6th. On the 7th I saw people around the world chanting slogans calling for his murder in the name of "resistance." Again, don't put words in my mouth.
comment in response to post
If you step on board a boat for an adventure with this guy, it says something.
comment in response to post
Don't put words in other people's mouths.
comment in response to post
In the US you could get out of those if you were in IT and spent the $3K to get diagnosed.
comment in response to post
And Hamas will deny using aid to control the population until the Gazan residents discover and empty yet another Hamas warehouse. Their only income stream right now comes from confiscating aid and selling at black market rates.
comment in response to post
One of the passengers went so far as to attend Hassan Nasrallah's funeral. The organizer of this trip is very much an apologist. So yes.
comment in response to post
Which is why it requires that legitimate cargoes once inspected proceed past. Which is what happened to the 3/4 shopping bags on that boat.
comment in response to post
And your argument is based on the assumption that Hamas apologists don't want to empower Hamas with armaments. There is plenty of food pouring into the GHF distribution points in Gaza. Civilians using them have been shot, and not by the IDF.
comment in response to post
If it really was just about the food, they could have sailed straight to Ashdod. The purpose was to open this route, for other ships. With other cargo.
comment in response to post
It's called the San Remo Manual. Give it a read.
comment in response to post
When you run a blockade, you stop every ship, intercept every cargo, and only let through the cargo with the expired aspirin and hot pockets or whatever they had. Otherwise, Hamas gets to step up their rocketry hobby.
comment in response to post
The purpose was demonstrated by it setting course through the blockade zone instead of sailing straight to Ashdod.
comment in response to post
I take it you've not noticed that Hamas has an interest in rocketry.
comment in response to post
Just leave it in the mocking quotes it. Serves well enough.
comment in response to post
They can challenge the protesters to a dance off.
comment in response to post
The paucity of rockets helps childhood friends of mine sleep at night. And the "aid" they brought along will be delivered to Gaza. And Ms. Thunberg's narcissistic moment will damage everything she tries to do from today onwards. I am sad to say it, not happy.
comment in response to post
She also described herself as being "kidnapped" when there are still 55 hostages in Gaza who have not seen the sun in 2 years. She will never be allowed to live the narcissism of that moment down.
comment in response to post
The AMA should convene a committee made up of the same members.
comment in response to post
Your certainly says more about you than about the IDF.
comment in response to post
Yeah, I'm sure the leftovers from the ship's provisions were a vitally important cargo for Gaza. Definitely....
comment in response to post
They were not there to deliver food. They were there to try to force open a route for munitions.
comment in response to post
"Illegally" right. *sigh*
comment in response to post
The cops you're talking about may not even have been cops 7 months ago. Police academy is too brief, too unserious, and that makes it too easy to replace entire police forces with an entirely different idea of what a police force should be.
comment in response to post
"I don't believe a single liar "started" the alarmist nonsense about climate. " Every bit of what you call nonsense about the climate came from a scientist whose name you can find in under 10 minutes. So name the first.
comment in response to post
Hard to find anyone involved in the conflict who isn't an asshole.
comment in response to post
For anyone who doubts you on this: google Vittorio Arrigoni.
comment in response to post
The guy who started it. The discovery of AGW was a chronology of single discoveries by single scientists. If it's a hoax, it started with one scientific paper by one scientist, and it should take you under 10 minutes to find it, Mensa boy.
comment in response to post
Name the hoaxer, Mensa boy.
comment in response to post
Nobody is omniscient, but lots of people are literate and intelligent, and you appear not to be among them. You do not need to be God to look these things up. A lot of people worked hard to make it easy for you. So name the hoaxer.
comment in response to post
And 50 years later you can't look up a PDF on Google Scholar. How sad.
comment in response to post
I've certainly not come up with any indication that you really are a Mensa boy.
comment in response to post
Scientists were talking about global warming before Gore was even born. Try again.
comment in response to post
There's a whole lot of AI model training and web reindexing that can be scheduled with power demand response as part of the equation.
comment in response to post
No, science isn't a courtroom drama, but it is a carefully documented process, exactly because of the risk of misconduct. Which is why if there was any, it should take you under 10 minutes to find exactly where it began.
comment in response to post
For a Mensa boy, you seem unable to follow any logic at all. And you can't even do a simple search on Google Scholar.
comment in response to post
If AGW is a hoax, the scientific discoveries ARE the hoax. And finding the first scientist to publish a paper with a falsehood should take a bona fide Mensa boy under 10 minutes. Yet none of you can do it. Chronology is a liberal hoax too?