omniotics.bsky.social - Profile | ThreadSky | a Reddit-style client for Bluesky

Your brain isn’t broken. You’re just running a different OS—one that doesn’t serve empire. Start trusting that system.

submitted 30 days ago • 0 comments

Want to challenge empire? Learn to challenge categories. The line between “me” and “not me” is where all control begins.

submitted 30 days ago • 0 comments

We were trained to think in either/ors. Success or failure. Man or woman. Capitalism or chaos. That training wasn’t neutral—it was political.

submitted 30 days ago • 0 comments

Capitalism fears psychedelics for the same reason it fears non-binary people: they can’t be standardized.

submitted 30 days ago • 0 comments

Psychedelics: Not dangerous because they make you hallucinate. Dangerous because they make you question. Especially the lies that hold society together.

submitted 30 days ago • 0 comments

Your "mental clarity" might just be colonized logic. Binary thinking feels neat—but it’s a prison built for control.

submitted 30 days ago • 0 comments

Most social theory analyzes systems within categories. The next wave of theory will analyze how categories are enforced in the first place.

submitted 30 days ago • 0 comments

If binary thinking is the software of empire, non-binary people are the glitch in the matrix.

submitted 30 days ago • 0 comments

Every time someone comes out as non-binary, they don’t just confuse a boomer uncle—they threaten the entire logic of power.

submitted 30 days ago • 0 comments

Your mind is not a monolith. Your identity is not binary. Your truth is not a slogan. These aren’t just self-help ideas. They’re blueprints for revolution.

submitted 30 days ago • 0 comments

Imagine a medicine that makes you question authority, deflates your ego, and can’t be patented. Yeah, that’s why it’s illegal.

submitted 30 days ago • 0 comments

Psychedelics threaten power not because they're fun—but because they work. They collapse ego, shatter false binaries, and cost cents. They’re the poor man’s revolution.

submitted 30 days ago • 0 comments

You can’t build hierarchical empires on people who reject fixed identity. Plurality destabilizes the very idea of who gets to rule and why.

submitted 30 days ago • 0 comments

Plural identity challenges the West's obsession with a "true self." What if you’re not one thing? What if you’re many? That’s not a mental illness. That’s a political threat.

submitted 30 days ago • 0 comments

Most people think the fight for non-binary recognition is about bathrooms and pronouns. It's not. It's about dismantling the mental operating system of oppression.

submitted 30 days ago • 0 comments

Colonialism. Capitalism. Patriarchy. They all rely on binaries: ruler/ruled, man/woman, rich/poor. Non-binary identities don't just defy one of these—they call into question the entire structure.

submitted 30 days ago • 0 comments

Why do authoritarian systems hate non-binary people? Because when you disrupt one rigid category, the whole mental scaffolding starts to fall apart.

submitted 30 days ago • 0 comments

People think non-binary identity only threatens gender norms. But the real threat? It unravels the mental habit of binary thinking—on which power structures depend. Binary gender → Binary economics → Binary politics.

submitted 30 days ago • 0 comments

Your birth does not decide your worth Your native tongue does not limit your work Your borders do not block your belonging Your success is shared, not stolen We do not wait for permission. We design this future now.

submitted 86 days ago • 0 comments

We believe that rich countries do not need to fall— but they must shift from domination to collaboration. The goal is not guilt. The goal is balance. The future must be earned forward, not hoarded. We believe AI and technology must serve liberation, not legacy.

submitted 86 days ago • 0 comments

We will teach global identity. We are not just citizens of nations. We are citizens of Earth, nodes in a shared system. We will raise children to know many languages, many histories. Not to assimilate—but to navigate. To build bridges, not borders.

submitted 86 days ago • 0 comments

We will rewrite the scorecard. GDP is not success. Stock markets are not well-being. We will measure dignity, freedom, access, and interconnection. A country’s greatness will be measured not by its wealth, but by how few people it leaves behind.

submitted 86 days ago • 0 comments

We will reprogram the economy. We will stop chasing endless growth for the rich. We will create room for others to rise. We will forgive debt created through exploitation. We will invest in infrastructure, education, and health— not as charity, but as justice.

submitted 86 days ago • 0 comments

We will build true mobility. We will replace immigration lotteries and border walls with coordinated, open systems where talent moves freely. Work will follow skill—not paperwork. Language will not decide who gets to participate. Translation will be instant. Understanding will be default.

submitted 86 days ago • 0 comments

We will expose the system. We will trace wealth to its source: conquest, extraction, empire. We will map the unspoken architecture of global inequality and name it. We will stop mistaking inherited power for earned success.

submitted 86 days ago • 0 comments

We reject the idea that where you’re born should dictate how far you go. We reject borders that treat human potential like a crime. We reject languages used as walls instead of bridges. We believe any person, from any place, should be free to thrive anywhere.

submitted 86 days ago • 0 comments

The world is not broken by accident. It is designed—layered through history, enforced by systems, and hidden behind myths. We are told that hard work leads to success. But success still depends on your passport, your accent, your birthplace. That is not meritocracy. That is a lie.

submitted 86 days ago • 0 comments

It is rational for men to resist systemic disruptions that don't acknowledge and offer solutions to share this burden.

submitted 195 days ago • 0 comments

Men intuitively know a woman's life is biologically more valuable than a man's. One burden men carry is the understanding that when systems collapse and violence surges, men are more likely to willingly risk their lives to put it back together.

submitted 195 days ago • 0 comments

Consciousness decides whether to reward or punish itself for it's actions. Store Info - Neutral Transfer Info - Neural Process Info - Neutral Observe processing of info, info does not align with prior sense of self - Punish self for processing of info

submitted 202 days ago • 0 comments

Naïve insight? I genuinely don't know negativity spreads on micro-blogging. Isn't the POINT that character limits reduce nuance so we all sort of temporarily tolerate a lack of nuance? Speaking of, it would be a fun experiment to play with variable limits. Like 200-Tuesdays or 400-Fridays.

submitted 204 days ago • 0 comments