onen.bsky.social
lighthearted posts about things i like and/or care about
246 posts
135 followers
539 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
He sexually assaulted someone by groping them under their blouse. The victim's name is easy to find. It's fine to call someone who does that a rapist
comment in response to
post
I disagree but I can see where you're coming from
comment in response to
post
you're genuinely my favorite youtuber
comment in response to
post
That's silly and seriously harms your credibility. If you were serious, you'd have a transparent process while making the information used during vetting confidential.
comment in response to
post
They also post misinformation like the unsourced and unrealistic number of protestors. It cheapens the protests and is just done to drive engagement
comment in response to
post
They post fake number codes for engagement, they post real news stories that they just got from the news without attribution and they have a monetary incentive to drive engagement. You can get the same info from any source that posts the news, why not go for one that's transparent?
comment in response to
post
What's the vetting process?
comment in response to
post
Has alt nps been hacked or are they fake? They're asking for money via merch
comment in response to
post
If you've had five separate conversations in a single day with people pointing out that this group and the messages they spread share parallels with QAnon, maybe it's time to take a step back and evaluate your beliefs rather than dismissing it as "gaslighting"
comment in response to
post
mmyah
comment in response to
post
Did QAnon followers also piss off all the right people? Because they were also widely mocked and people typically didn't engage with their arguments
comment in response to
post
Vetted how and by who? Other accounts making the same claim? QAnon influencers "vetted" each other too
comment in response to
post
Can you explain why people pointing out parallels with qanon is a positive for you?
comment in response to
post
You can barely write a coherent sentence
comment in response to
post
Damn this is so cool. How'd you get into the hobby?
comment in response to
post
Shameful. Even The Netherlands still calls it No Kings
comment in response to
post
Got blocked lol. I guess that's an answer too
comment in response to
post
Answer the question then
comment in response to
post
Don't deflect
comment in response to
post
Why not direct that comment to Newsom?
comment in response to
post
It's obviously keas
comment in response to
post
That says more about you than the other poster I'm afraid
comment in response to
post
Is a beer guy holding the gun?
comment in response to
post
I know a guy who has bought into AI so hard he asked chatgpt to make him a commander deck. It took him like seven tries to even get 100 cards in the list, but for some reason he assumed that the seventh list would be good anyway. I'm baffled
comment in response to
post
My language is set to English. Could just be a Steam bug ignoring my language settings and going off IP though
comment in response to
post
Left a review and noticed this. Maybe something misconfigured?
comment in response to
post
台鸡
comment in response to
post
Chug skooma
comment in response to
post
Yeah I used to hate it but now I really do understand it. Still use a VPN tho lol
comment in response to
post
Jojo sometimes hits the same notes in how the characters come up with schemes but yeah it's tough finding the good stuff
comment in response to
post
How can we trust that Grok is accurately reporting the prompt? I'm sure it was instructed to do something like this, but there's no reason to believe that's the literal prompt. LLMs aren't intelligent or understand context, they just generate output based on context regardless of factual accuracy
comment in response to
post
No joke - I learned a lot of English from playing Morrowind. It was the first language heavy game I played and my English was still quite poor. I remember asking my mom what a necromancer is (she had no idea)
comment in response to
post
People can care about multiple things at the same time
comment in response to
post
You said something incredibly stupid and now you're trying to backtrack and pretend you didn't say those things. You're not fooling anyone
comment in response to
post
Fresh water functionally disappears if you use it. Sources replenish, but only at a certain rate. It's a problem throughout the US and the world. I don't think this argument against LLMs is very strong due to the impact being relatively low, but pretending freshwater is infinite is dumb
comment in response to
post
You can have that argument with someone else, that's not what I was talking about. I don't think the water usage argument against LLMs is very compelling compared to other arguments, but it was still being grossly misrepresented by implying freshwater is an infinite resource
comment in response to
post
So you agree that "Water famously goes away after you use it once, I don’t know what you’re talking about" and posting a picture of the rain cycle is a stupid response to the water usage argument.
comment in response to
post
Freshwater sources around the globe are being depleted faster than they are regenerated. This is well known. You can argue that the impact of LLMs on this isn't that big but you can't argue freshwater is infinite
comment in response to
post
??? What a leap
comment in response to
post
The claim I was responding to is that water is essentially infinite, and that's a dumb claim. The water usage argument against AI has some merit in that we need to take water conservation a lot more seriously, but I think it's a fairly weak argument against AI specifically
comment in response to
post
Yes, and? Do you think all water returns neatly back to its source because of rain?
comment in response to
post
They can't ever stop the training or their valuations would instantly implode
comment in response to
post
Yeah it's interesting how people insist there are all these use cases but nobody is specifying what they are
comment in response to
post
Idk why anyone would feel threatened since it's actual dogshit for anything other than speeding up simple tasks. It's actually crazy how little it has improved on that front over time. It is a time saver when used properly though, but not on a big enough scale to be a threat to someone's job
comment in response to
post
Nobody wants LLMs for how much it costs. If OpenAI priced usage of chatgpt and the like high enough for them to make a profit or even break even, practically nobody would be using it
comment in response to
post
Sorry but you're being just as silly by misrepresenting or misunderstanding the argument. They're talking about drinkable water evaporating. Yes, that functionally disappears after it evaporates
comment in response to
post