paireon.bsky.social
I have no idea why so many people follow me. Maybe I should start a cult to the Great Old Ones or something.
1,317 posts
376 followers
609 following
Discussion Master
comment in response to
post
Huh, I thought it was a pet baku.
comment in response to
post
Hey now, I'm Canadian.
That said if American I would have DEFINITELY voted for her. Anything but that orange turd in a soiled diaper.
comment in response to
post
LOL, fair. As long as we can agree that FUCK REAGAN, I think we'll get along fine.
comment in response to
post
/2 And until Trump, both parties had been favoring neoliberal economic policies for several decades by now (even Carter had notable deregulatory tendencies IIRC), which saw their ultimate Democratic expression in Clinton.
comment in response to
post
Weird - to me, Clinton is something of an arch-Liberal, likely because I look at it from a non-American angle (am Canadian).
Liberalism to me is a center-right ideology which encourages as much deregulation and as little government control/oversight as possible. 1/
comment in response to
post
(Full disclosure: I utterly LOATHE Reagan, as you may have guessed)
comment in response to
post
Plausible; in my defense I'm Canadian, so I may not have 100% of the context you do.
Even then, IMO it's the same deregulatory impulse that made Reagan repeal the Fairness doctrine that made Clinton do what he did (though again this does not cast Clinton in a better light) so still kinda Reagan.
comment in response to
post
TBF Reagan was an even bigger component as to how we got here. Clinton was pretty much a direct consequence of 12 years of Reagan+Reagan's veep.
Yes this still makes Clinton shit; I remember when Michael Moore called him one of the best Republican presidents and thinking "yeah, sounds about right".
comment in response to
post
Sooo... does that mean you still support Clinton in 2025?
Because supporting him then and supporting him now are two very different things.
comment in response to
post
Yeah probably gonna switch too.
comment in response to
post
Ah yes, listen to the man who says "we'll think about it for two weeks" then turns around and launches an attack barely two days later. It's all lies and bluster and whining with Trump.
comment in response to
post
Oh hey so that means Spawn of Shittan #5 actually has one talent.
comment in response to
post
"you have completely lost me."
Translation: "I do not want to understand this likely very valid point @heppy111.bsky.social made because then I would be confronted with the concept that maybe, just maybe, my narrative is a bunch of bollocks."
comment in response to
post
The bad news: it didn't convince me
The good news: it's because I follow you already
comment in response to
post
Fair assessment
comment in response to
post
Soooo... human extinction it is, then? Cool, cool.
Okay maybe leave a few "uncontacted" tribes, maybe they can make a better go of it a few millenia down the road.
comment in response to
post
Now, now. It's insulting to pendejos to associate Couchfucker Vance to them.
comment in response to
post
You know the current regime treats it as toilet paper, right?
...Right?
comment in response to
post
TBF Dubya, while bad, was never even in the running for worst president. I mean, Buchanan, Reagan, Jackson, and Johnson are RIGHT THERE.
comment in response to
post
*Shitload of belligerent, militarist rhetoric about a military strike*
"NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE!"
Might as well stab someone in the eye with a fork screaming "DIE BITCH!" and then saying "We shouldn't be violent!"
comment in response to
post
I have another even more foolproof tactic:
Being Canadian.
comment in response to
post
Maybe it's yet another component of Zuck's "not even trying to pretend he's not fascist anymore" phase.
comment in response to
post
Bold of you to assume they considered they had to use any justification beyond "they were breathing in my vicinity".
Fascists gonna fash.
comment in response to
post
COUNTERPOINT: You're also a loser if you stan them and are under 30.
NO. EXCUSES.
comment in response to
post
Fun fact: Betar is a fascist "revisionist Zionist" movement founded in the 20s in Europe with maximalist territorial ambitions and a tendency to organize itself like a paramilitary militia. Now, where have we heard THAT before?
comment in response to
post
Idea: let's start calling every Republican senator from a southern or rural state Bubba or Cletus. See how mad they get.
comment in response to
post
It's a risk I'm willing to take. Loved Liam Vickers' pre-Murder Drones short CliffSide.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGa8...
comment in response to
post
...I REALLY gotta start watching GLITCH's stuff...
comment in response to
post
Twisted Tales was such a surreal treat to watch.
comment in response to
post
Maybe try and convince him to wash up first. Dude looks ripe. Probably a lot of fun afterwards though.
comment in response to
post
See, this is why I've always taken the shark's side in that movie.
comment in response to
post
I'm a man and I aprrove this message.
(Not that it actually needs my approval, just that... y'know... it's neat and I wanted to show support)
comment in response to
post
PRAISE THE SUN!
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
Hey now, dude likely lost his virginity a while back.
With an altar boy.
comment in response to
post
"Are ya winning, son?"
-Fred Trump asking from down below
comment in response to
post
Which a lot of goes to said red states' farmers, who then complain about blue states' "welfare queens" unironically because they have the self-awareness of a rock
comment in response to
post
Because to "get" it would drag them kicking and screaming out of their comfort zone. I said back then that J6 was Trump's Beer Hall Putsch and I was told I was exaggerating; well, now the Reichstag is on fire.
comment in response to
post
Also, given the current confluence of circumstances, said rock bottom may actually involve the outright extinction of said humans.
comment in response to
post
Oh boy wait until you see Stellaris. For a long while it was actually almost a necessity to reach the endgame because otherwise species bloat would eventually bring down game speed to a screeching halt.
comment in response to
post
This bears an uncanny resemblance to me. Because I'm all thumbs.
comment in response to
post
Everyday I get at least one reminder that the 60s, 70s and/or 80s were mostly horribad when it came to non-musical aesthetics
comment in response to
post
Good news: I already follow you.
Also that first one would look great for Trench Crusade.
comment in response to
post
Reminder that Gene Roddenberry was outright Socialist. And no, that's not a bad thing.
comment in response to
post
Shag carpet!? IN BATHROOMS?!
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
So MAGA stands for Make Asbestos Great Again, now?
Also, fun fact: biggest asbestos deposits are in Canada AFAIK, so they gonna have to pay tariffs to even get it.
comment in response to
post
LOLno. You cerrypicked data, took it out of context, exaggerated it until it was warped beyond recognition, then hypocritically presented it as if it actually proved your point. Again, your fascism is showing. Fascist.
comment in response to
post
Yes, they did vote for this. The cruelty is the point.
Until it's applied to them, then they claim they didn't vote for this because this shouldn't apply to them, forgetting the fundamental truth that fascist regimes are only safe for the ones on top.
comment in response to
post
I care. I care because holy FUCK do I ever need an XXXXL-size dose of hope these days. Gimme a Superman that makes me feel that maybe we're worth saving over Snyder's depressionfests any day.