Profile avatar
paulcamislairy.bsky.social
83 posts 22 followers 78 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
Tottenham were awful all season, and were a distant second best to an abject United in the final (and yes, I am aware that they fluked an own goal while United failed to score, but they were still bobbins). Spurs just looked at what happened when United gave ETH the benefit, not worth the risk.
comment in response to post
No, it's PE!
comment in response to post
Generally agree with the idea, nothing wrong with being gay, lots wrong with being pro genocide. Maybe take a look at the comments re choice.
comment in response to post
I'm sure most of that money was just given to him by concerned multi millionaire friends, friends who definitely didn't want anything in return.
comment in response to post
Depends on the type of exercise, but a sweaty workout (bike ride in my case) would be every other. I get away with it by being to old and unfit to exercise for more than 20min.
comment in response to post
Playing tug with this puppy.
comment in response to post
That does sum up Bel's time in the box though; how many stories this series would have been different if she was not there? Outside The robot revolution no episode would have been different if it was Ruby or no companion at all.
comment in response to post
The good thing is, as she drifts closer to David Ike than any mainstream voice she gets little attention outside of satirical laughing at her. Hopefully people will barely remember the name in a couple of years.
comment in response to post
I mean; yes, this is just one of 10,000 signs that global warming has changed the world under our feet and we should all be worried. But I'm a month away from a garden full of jam! So it's not all bad.
comment in response to post
In fairness to Alex dePfeffel Johnson, he may have taken more tax than almost anyone, but you can't accuse him of tax and spend!
comment in response to post
Tempted to agree, but that is the Telegraph, so printing things that are not true about the government while boosting the frog faced fuhrer is exactly what they do. Wouldn't take anything that paper has to say at face value.
comment in response to post
The crowd giving this BS the reception it deserves.
comment in response to post
Has Johnson been arrested yet? When is Cockhands trial for corporate manslaughter?
comment in response to post
It's a new line of attack, he was quoting Powell and making up scared stories about immigrants. But we all missed that he was also being racist to the Welsh.
comment in response to post
Even Reform refrain from voting Enoch Powel, that strangers in our own land line was sickeningly.
comment in response to post
This government might just destroy the labour party: if you blame your shi££y life on imigrants you are voting for an actual far right party and if you are not an immigrant hating anti trans climate denier, Starmer might not be for you. I cannot see who would actually vote for them.
comment in response to post
Strong Auntie Viv from Fresh Prince vibes in that back three.
comment in response to post
Leland Sklaar is 77 years old, which means he's early 30s at thus point!
comment in response to post
Height of the empire, when you castrated the gays and brown people knew their place?
comment in response to post
Austerity and privatisation are NeoLib policies. Pensioner fuel allowance, reforms to disability benefits, not repealing the 2 child benefits cap - austerity SEZs = privatisation, nothing Streeting has said or done suggest they are interested in pulling privatisation out of the NHS.
comment in response to post
This would be most Labour voters dream, but the fact is Starmer is a pro Austerity NoeLib. If the current cabinet were interested in being progressive and improving the lot of the country (proving that the right wing were wrong in the process) they would have done this from day one.