pcoggins.bsky.social
A liberal tech founder from the uk.
Many years navigating the world of advertising, adtech and media.
1,092 posts
2,689 followers
4,158 following
Prolific Poster
Conversation Starter
comment in response to
post
Unfortunately he is proof that you can lie with a smile and win.
comment in response to
post
I think you’re planning to be President after Trump. You don’t believe in democracy, you are a believer in that Curtis Yarvin monarchy claptrap, and you have zero morals. Potentially a rather big danger to the world
comment in response to
post
And yet, like lemmings the same people who admit Brexit has not worked, will vote Farage.
Psychologically they cling to the hope he can fix it, and that they weren’t wrong to believe.
Brexit is basically a failed cult, but one where the leader has launched a new branch of the same bs.
comment in response to
post
BS.
Labour get a grip and realise Trump does not give two Sh@ts about the UK
comment in response to
post
I supported khan but he recently lost me when
a) he accepted a knighthood and
b) said the king apologised for taking so long
Arrogance beyond belief and disgustingly deferential to inherited power
comment in response to
post
I fear Trump is just an instigator for a mission that Vance will complete, funded by Musk and the tech bros.
comment in response to
post
They are so confused right now. No idea how to balance impartiality with lies.
They should let the BBC verify team take over and kick out everyone else.
comment in response to
post
Nationalise energy (and water). Reduce bills for everyone.
comment in response to
post
Why does no one discuss the cause for this debacle?
Everyone, regardless of age, deserves to be warm.
The reason they are not is because energy prices are high. Sort out the problem not U-turn on crap policy based on votes
Scrap the fuel benefit, nationalise energy, lower prices for all
comment in response to
post
In the search for impartiality the BBC have ended up fueling extremism.
They are ably abetted by the other media.
Two opposing views are not equal if one view is clearly factually false
This is not hard so why get it so wrong?
comment in response to
post
Musk will fund Vance and his run for the presidency.
comment in response to
post
Just to be clear, I’m sick of government waste & cutting fuel payments etc, but your premise that this is a nuclear capability I think is wrong.
These are conventionally armed subs with nuclear reactors, meaning they can stay under water and are meant to prevent Russia cutting cables to the UK