pdxspeck.bsky.social
Proud Far Left Lunatic
162 posts
116 followers
97 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Noem was literally talking about "liberating" California from its democratically elected leaders at the time. Sen. Padilla's questioning of her was not only not wrong, it was _required_.
This "both sides" junk is par for the course for this guy.
comment in response to
post
It's all computer!
comment in response to
post
It's become impossible to believe the words of anyone in this administration. Without a transcript or readout, I just assume that it's all bullshit.
comment in response to
post
I think he needs someone to explain to him what a hard drive is, because it's apparent that nobody has done so.
comment in response to
post
Whenever they're cornered, they invariably pivot to "Green New Deal", "Waste, Fraud, and Abuse" or "DEI".
comment in response to
post
Guys like him, Tuberville, MTG, Boebert, et. al. prove that a well-marketed ham sandwich could be elected to national office.
comment in response to
post
His age caught up with him, as it does all of us. At least he was competent, had seasoned advisors, and respected the rule of law. The rest is palace intrigue. OTOH, there's an absolute abrogation of oath and decency that is happening as we speak, and all we hear are crickets.
comment in response to
post
I thought it was the immigrants who brought all the crime ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
comment in response to
post
Here in Portland, watching the atomic plume from my front step, hungover from a full-tilt Saturday night.
comment in response to
post
"We have a term 'groceries.' It's an old term but it means basically what you're buying, food, it's a pretty accurate term but it's an old fashioned sound but groceries are down."
comment in response to
post
I dunno. A guy stupid enough to look directly at the sun during an eclipse is dumb enough to insist on standing up while bullets are flying.
comment in response to
post
Yet here we are with *daily* audio of Trump incoherently blathering about one thing or another, and no one seems to bat an eye...
comment in response to
post
www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqo5...
comment in response to
post
That is terrible advice.
comment in response to
post
Corruption does *not* require an explicit quid pro quo. Indeed, most favors in these are _implied_, mostly for plausible deniability. This kind of ridiculous hair-splitting sounds like it came from one of Trump's idiot lawyers.
comment in response to
post
Peruvian.
comment in response to
post
"competent" lol
comment in response to
post
This is like the water retreating from the shoreline just before the tsunami hits. An eerie calm before utter chaos.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
I want to be this man's friend.
comment in response to
post
Boomers gonna boom.
Source: Am a boomer. I also know how to work remotely so that I'm looking at the people I'm talking to.
Seriously, he is one of the reasons I left the Democratic party after 40+ years and registered as an Independent. Time to pass the torch to those who know wtf is going on.
comment in response to
post
"It's just a prank, bro!"
comment in response to
post
Hamberder!
comment in response to
post
Collaborators all.
comment in response to
post
At least Grommit had a plan.
comment in response to
post
REMINDER:
He doesn't actually have a plan.
comment in response to
post
I had high hopes for Glusenkamp Perez. I know she represents a fairly red district, so expected some votes that diverged from the rest of the Democratic party, but this is wolf-in-sheep's-clothing bad.